** 2024 Opponent Preview : Colorado (Game 2) **

[brophog]

As E-Shedeur scrambles out of a clean pocket...

In Madden when a QB runs backwards to avoid perceived pressure, it's considered a bug. In Boulder, it's just 3rd down.

 

[Mavric]

[No message]

 

[brophog]

What Spring Game?

They played red rover for 15 minutes, got tired of doing that, then had ice cream.

 

[Saunders]

[No message]

 

[gobiggergoredder]

They had Pac12 on their field for the spring game?

 

[BigRedBuster]

They had Pac12 on their field for the spring game?

After paying Prime, they don't have money for new artwork.

 

[gobiggergoredder]

After paying Prime, they don't have money for new artwork.

I guess so.

I get not having big 12, but wouldn't you make an effort to cover up Pac 12?

 

[Saunders]

I guess so.

I get not having big 12, but wouldn't you make an effort to cover up Pac 12?

They were still a Pac 12 member until July 1st.

 

[gobiggergoredder]

They were still a Pac 12 member until July 1st.

I appreciate you clarifying the obvious.  At the time of their spring game they were done with playing any games in the PAC 12.

unless they were contractually bound, I’d make every effort to have that covered up.  I would have spent the $100 for paint at Menards and $400 in OT for a member of the CU grounds crew.

It comes off to me as lazy by the athletic department.

 

[Red Five]

I appreciate you clarifying the obvious.  At the time of their spring game they were done with playing any games in the PAC 12.

unless they were contractually bound, I’d make every effort to have that covered up.  I would have spent the $100 for paint at Menards and $400 in OT for a member of the CU grounds crew.

It comes off to me as lazy by the athletic department.

I can't believe Phil Knight didn't spend the $500 to have the Pac 12 logo covered at Oregon's spring game

 

[gobiggergoredder]

7 minutes ago, Red Five said:



I can't believe Phil Knight didn't spend the $500 to have the Pac 12 logo covered at Oregon's spring game

Must be required because there’s really no reason to have it on there.  If I’m being fair, I doubt 99% of people care.

 

[runningblind]

Must be required because there’s really no reason to have it on there.  If I’m being fair, I doubt 99% of people care.

I think you're right on the 99%, because this seems like such a non issue to me.  They'll fix it in the fall.

 

[Mierin]

I appreciate you clarifying the obvious.  At the time of their spring game they were done with playing any games in the PAC 12.

unless they were contractually bound, I’d make every effort to have that covered up.  I would have spent the $100 for paint at Menards and $400 in OT for a member of the CU grounds crew.

It comes off to me as lazy by the athletic department.

I mean, it was on the Pac-12 network. And I would imagine they were contractually bound.

Must be required because there’s really no reason to have it on there.  If I’m being fair, I doubt 99% of people care.

Oregon's game was also aired on the Pac-12 network.

 

[gobiggergoredder]

I mean, it was on the Pac-12 network. And I would imagine they were contractually bound.

Oregon's game was also aired on the Pac-12 network.

I wasn’t aware of that, but it all seems to make sense.   Huskerboard resolved my curiosity.  Thanks.

 

[Dogs In A Pile]

Deion Sanders chaotic culture turns into locker room violence in Colorado