I'm not going into their orientation.... :sarcasmSo, can the D just play both ways? :horns2
Oh my, you did not just compare the '95 offense to this one....... :facepalm:I seem to recall the 95 orange bowl having it's share of punting from our end...3&out time after time doesn't even begin to wear the defense down.How did you ever survive the osborne era without jumping ship? Patience is the key. I believe we can wear down their defense if we keep pounding away. What would you prefer? Let Lee throw dumpoffs all game?Ah, ok so now we're going for Cally's USC strat? The way OU is moving the ball, 7-3 isn't going to win it for us. Grinding it out on the ground isn't going to work, I'm afraid, as OU will be scoring more in the second half.How about Green 8 yards rushing ...Lee minus 13. It's obvious we are trying to grind this one out on the ground so green makes better sense with this gameplan. Why is this so hard to understand?
I'm not talking about punting. If we could get a first down or two nearly every drive I might agree. But we have 1 the whole first half. We aren't wearing them down one bit.I seem to recall the 95 orange bowl having it's share of punting from our end...3&out time after time doesn't even begin to wear the defense down.How did you ever survive the osborne era without jumping ship? Patience is the key. I believe we can wear down their defense if we keep pounding away. What would you prefer? Let Lee throw dumpoffs all game?Ah, ok so now we're going for Cally's USC strat? The way OU is moving the ball, 7-3 isn't going to win it for us. Grinding it out on the ground isn't going to work, I'm afraid, as OU will be scoring more in the second half.How about Green 8 yards rushing ...Lee minus 13. It's obvious we are trying to grind this one out on the ground so green makes better sense with this gameplan. Why is this so hard to understand?