Poll: Do you like the Big Ten Logos and Division Names?

[tschu]

Just curious what you all think about the logos/divisions in the Big 10. Fire Away!

 

[The Dude]

lolno

 

[74Hunter]

Just curious what you all think about the logos/divisions in the Big 10. Fire Away!

Suck. All of them, including the stupid names attached to player/coach of the year awards.

 

[HuskerInLostWages]

The logo looks ok I guess, maybe it will grow on me. I see what they were trying to do by keeping the "10" with the 1 and the G, but it looks like something a pimply faced teen would come up with, not a professional designer. As for the naming of the divisions, am I the only one who thinks they sound too arrogant? It also seems to me it sounds as if it's going for "the teams that used to be awesome", the legends, and then "the people who are currently doing well, but have zero in terms of tradition", or the leaders.

Last I checked Iowa has done close to nothing to be considered a "Legend" so it just sounds really stupid to me. I wont even comment on a few others in our "Legends" division who don't deserve that name in any shape or form.

Just my opinion here

 

[bball_backer]

Logo - Don't like, but don't really care.

Division names - AWFUL

Trophy names - Why did they need names? Why can't they just be "Championship Trophy" "MVP Trophy" etc.

 

[Lil' Red]

The logo is ok but the division names are pretty corny.

 

[Sparker]

I don't mind "Legends". "Leaders" sucks a big one. The logo is OK except for that shade of blue is a bit too baby-y.

 

[NUance]

I like them. They are the greatest.

/jk. But I can live with them.

 

[AllTheGoodNamesAreTaken]

does anyone know what the trophies were called before now?

 

[Nexus]

I like this version of the logo.

The rest of the logo variations can be seen here

Other than that, not real crazy about the division names. I agree with mmmtodd and think they should've left it at X and O.

The logo has a retro feel to it, but not crazy about the color. It's not bad, but it's not great either. I'll get used to it though.

The trophy names is a bit too much as well.

All in all, it feels like they over thought these details. Sometimes less is more.

 

[NUance]

does anyone know what the trophies were called before now?

Not sure if the B10 trophy had a name other than the Big 10 trophy. Of course there were no divisions until now, so only one trophy.

 

[The RANT]

This is the "New Big Ten" first utter meltdown. Who signed off on those names. Is it possible to change them? hahaa

 

[JTrain]

I accidentally hit Yes on the poll, but please count me a no. Logo is all kinds of wrong. Font looks straight out of a bad Western movie poster. The blue is bad too. I get that they were trying to be iconic by keeping it ultra-simple with no borders/shading/etc., it just didn't work.

On the divisions, see Sparker above. Leaders???

 

[husker_hurdler]

I liked the "Plains" and "Great Lakes" idea

 

[Redmusky]

I rather have the one the husker made up

BIG TEN and the N being red