Breaking down the Big Ten

We will win or division, the only real competition in our division is Michigan State. Iowa is losing everybody, Michigan will be breaking in a new coaching staff, Minnesota stinks, Northwestern is a decent team that will surprisem some people but IMO we are better.
Not if we continue to play like the last 4 games we won't. We aren't in the North divison anymore. As long as Watson still calling plays i can't be optimitic. Our new division is much more balanced than we have faced before.
This is the mantality that we need to purge from Nebraska fans' minds. You mean to tell me that the Big Ten is THAT much better than us? Not a chance. We did not have a single give me game last year either and we won ten games and lost four by a total of 20 points. There is not a single team in the Big Ten next year that is better than us. We win our division because we are the best returning team in that division.
This is the mentality of husker fans who think we will waltz right into the Big Ten and start owning them. I'm not saying we won't win the division just caution against over optimism. We almost lost to Iowa St, they aren't good at all. So we will with no hesitation beat Ohio St, Penn St, and Wisconsin? can you pass the weed so i can smoke what you are smoking?
First of all, those 4 games we lost, we might have only lost by 20 points, but in those four games, outside of the Big XII title game, did we look remotely competitive??

If we lost 3 games in conference next year, I would not be suprised. Two of those losses will probably be to Ohio St/Wisc/Mich St, and that wouldn't shock me. The third loss will be one of those that just baffles all of us.
I'll respond to the both of you here:

Husker_99 - Sure, we almost lost to ISU with our non-starting QB who was playing with a concussion. Let's do a rundown of our Schedule:

Iowa - LOST to a school that employs Kevin Cosgrove. I am very sorry, but that is much worse than ALMOST losing to ISU

Michigan State - beat one team that had more than 7 regular season wins

Wisconsin - They lose a lot. An OC, a good RB, a QB that managed their offense very well.

Ohio State - This will be Pryor's first game back. Anyone who has played knows that your first game in the season isn't always the greatest.

Minnesota - You claim that we are "no longer in the Big 12 North so we don't have any easy games" but yet fail to realize this team is on the schedule.

Northwestern = Kansas MAYBE K-State where you have to play the game, but they will never be closer than arm's length.

Penn State - has not been relevant since Jo Pa turned 70. If you break down their roster as well, they were very senior dominated as well so they can't even use the youth excuse.

Michigan- breaking in a new coaching staff, could be improved, but we will see.

You can't tell me that if you put 2010's schedule down next to this one and say that is was that much inferior. You can't. If you think logically about it I bet that we have more people on this board that are of the same opinion. So I am not smoking anything. The Big Ten was not better than the Big Twelve in 2010.
So EZ-E you are telling me that playing Iowa St, Missouri, Kansas, Kansas St, and Colorado is tougher than the Legends Division? I don't even think so. Ok so we play Minnesota? One team. Penn St was starting a freshman qb. Pryor may be starting the week we play them but to under estimate Ohio St. is a bad idea. Ok sure we beat Iowa St with our non starting qb but it's not like it was his first game or that he hadn't even started before for us. The Big 10 may not be better but the Big 12 South carries for more cache than the North has in the last 10 years. The south would be the sole reason why the Big 12 was better. It seems to me that a lot of people act like we just joined the WAC or C-USA. I'm not saying that we also joined the SEC but division wise we got a major upgrade. We had been beating the Big 12 North teams for so long there was never any competition to it anymore. they may got lucky a year or two but that was it. but let's go through our 2011 schedule:

September 3* Chattanooga W

September 10* Fresno State Toss up they play teams tough no matter what but probably a W

September 17* Washington Toss up will our team be inspired to play Wash for the 3rd time? W

September 24* at Wyoming W

October 1 at Wisconsin L

October 8 Ohio State L

October 22 at Minnesota W

October 29 Michigan State Toss up could be a L as well a W

November 5 Northwestern Toss up same as above

November 12 at Penn State L

November 19 at Michigan Toss up don't know how could the new coach will get Michigan ready

November 26 Iowa Toss up but probably a W

We could have a good record next year or easily a crappy record just depends on what Cornhusker team shows up like last year. I would say a crappy one if Watts is still OC. I have no faith in him whatsoever.
2010 Schedule

WKU

Idaho

SDSU

Washington

Kansas State

Texas

Okie State

Mizzou

Iowa State

Kansas

aTm

Colorado

OU

Washington

Look at the schedule that we played this past year. This was a tough schedule as well and don't tell me that the Big Ten schedule is that much better than this one. Because it is not. There are at least two teams on that schedule that would have been in the top two or three in the Big Ten if not the top spot in Okie State and OU.
Yes the Big Ten schedule is tougher than last years. If Martinez doesn't get hurt we crush Iowa St, Kansas, beat A&M, beat OU.

I would be willing to bet that I have broken down the Big Ten schedule and what each team has returning more times than you have. Besides the returning freshmen QB that Penn State has, they were very senior dominated. It will be very tough for us to lose that game.

A lot of people don't know how the Big Ten works. The conference has their swings because they don't have too many kids leave early. That is especially true with Iowa, Wisconsin, and Michigan State. They get a group of seniors one year and they run with them. Wisconsin is graduating one hell of a senior class. Iowa is graduating well... A senior class. There is not a team that has as balanced of a roster in terms of talent as we do. We have out-recruited all but one team on our schedule next year. That I promise you.
That also means that kids have been in the system and know it so when it's their turn to play there isn't much of a dropoff.
I live in Iowa. I know Big Ten Football well enough to say that we will run through our half of the conference with zero problem. We may very well lose a game in the Tiny Ten that baffles all of us. But we will be a lot better than 7-5 and that I would bet a lot of money on.

No team will be senior dominated in our division. Therefore, it won't be anyone's "turn to play."

 
I don't see us winning the division if it is status quo on offense. Do people really believe we are going to go in with same offense as this year and just get an automatic bid to the Big 10 championship? I will be shocked if we go in running the same drivel we ran this last year. Unless, we like losing a lot of 16-10, 20-13, 24-14 games. This is us next year in the Big 10 unless we shake this offense up.
I think that if we're going to have any success, it'll be running a similar offense to this year. I hope they change the passing game, but if we completely overhaul the offense, then we're going to be monumentally screwed. We can't afford to completely change our system again, it would just be another disaster.
So, I see you agree with me that our offense is pretty much a disaster right now. :lol: Not saying total overhaul of offense in any way. But how about some QB roll outs, some play action, some screens to the RB's, some action to the fullback, diamond formation with Rex and A. Green, upgrade to the WR's, and upgrade to the OL.

I was at the Holiday Bowl and we looked terrible. Our QB's are warming up trying to hit the crossbar on the FG and meanwhile UW is out there running full speed offensive plays. Our guys are warming up with ballet like high steps while the UW line is hitting full contact on each other. This team has to wake up. If we don't improve the offense it will be a long season next year. How hard is it to scheme against us when you just need to focus on stopping the run and our OL can't block anyway? McNeil was open several times but we threw poor balls. Our poor QB and RB's were tackled for loss on the snap basically. This is a bad offense. Sure run the zone read a few times and keep it in the playbook but we act like we are going to hit a homerun with it everytime it is called, which is way too often since we fell in love with it early on. I don't care who plays on offense next year just as long as they are the best out there, QB included. A. Green and K. Bell better be really, really scary good or we are in a world of hurt. Poor Rex is going to get clobbered out there next year if no one else steps up next season. Big 10 championship game with this offense? What are people :smokin ?

 
Husker fans need to get this through their heads:

THE THOUGHT OF BIG TEN SUPERIORITY IS FLAT OUT STUPID!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THE BIG TWELVE SCHEDULE WE PLAYED LAST YEAR WAS JUST AS TOUGH IF NOT TOUGHER THAN THE ONE THAT WE PLAYED THIS YEAR.

Anyone who thinks that the Tiny Ten is "hard-hitting" or that there is "week in and week out constant grind" in the conference did not follow Iowa all year. Nor did they follow any team that we will be playing for that matter.

 
Husker fans need to get this through their heads:

THE THOUGHT OF BIG TEN SUPERIORITY IS FLAT OUT STUPID!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THE BIG TWELVE SCHEDULE WE PLAYED LAST YEAR WAS JUST AS TOUGH IF NOT TOUGHER THAN THE ONE THAT WE PLAYED THIS YEAR.

Anyone who thinks that the Tiny Ten is "hard-hitting" or that there is "week in and week out constant grind" in the conference did not follow Iowa all year. Nor did they follow any team that we will be playing for that matter.
But... but... what about the Big 10 catching up to the SEC?

 
Husker fans need to get this through their heads:

THE THOUGHT OF BIG TEN SUPERIORITY IS FLAT OUT STUPID!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THE BIG TWELVE SCHEDULE WE PLAYED LAST YEAR WAS JUST AS TOUGH IF NOT TOUGHER THAN THE ONE THAT WE PLAYED THIS YEAR.

Anyone who thinks that the Tiny Ten is "hard-hitting" or that there is "week in and week out constant grind" in the conference did not follow Iowa all year. Nor did they follow any team that we will be playing for that matter.
Um, we're not playing in the MAC, it's not going to be easy. When you start underestimating your opponent, then you get "Iowa State'd"

And when we do have a clunker game, it's not going to be against Iowa St, but against somebody a bit better. So instead of escsaping with a win, that might be where we end up with a loss.

 
Husker fans need to get this through their heads:

THE THOUGHT OF BIG TEN SUPERIORITY IS FLAT OUT STUPID!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THE BIG TWELVE SCHEDULE WE PLAYED LAST YEAR WAS JUST AS TOUGH IF NOT TOUGHER THAN THE ONE THAT WE PLAYED THIS YEAR.

Anyone who thinks that the Tiny Ten is "hard-hitting" or that there is "week in and week out constant grind" in the conference did not follow Iowa all year. Nor did they follow any team that we will be playing for that matter.
Did you watch Nebraska all year long? cause i don't think you did. Most people on this board knows that Wats costs us games this season. We won inspite of Wats not knowing how to run an offense. Wats still calling plays will costs us games next year too.

 
fyi, putting part of your post in all caps, and larger font than usual, doesn't necessarily mean you are right...

 
Husker fans need to get this through their heads:

THE THOUGHT OF BIG TEN SUPERIORITY IS FLAT OUT STUPID!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THE BIG TWELVE SCHEDULE WE PLAYED LAST YEAR WAS JUST AS TOUGH IF NOT TOUGHER THAN THE ONE THAT WE PLAYED THIS YEAR.

Anyone who thinks that the Tiny Ten is "hard-hitting" or that there is "week in and week out constant grind" in the conference did not follow Iowa all year. Nor did they follow any team that we will be playing for that matter.
Did you watch Nebraska all year long? cause i don't think you did. Most people on this board knows that Wats costs us games this season. We won inspite of Wats not knowing how to run an offense. Wats still calling plays will costs us games next year too.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwTOfQ-izgA

:facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm:

This is a terrible argument against anything that I have said. You clearly do not know Shawn Watson with the quote that I bolded. This whole board knows what I think about the current OC situation so I will not repeat myself on that. If you would have came up with an intelligent response using factual information and logic it would not be as easy to prove you wrong on all accounts.

The only game that you can make an argument about the coaching losing a game is the Bowl Game where the entire coaching staff lost us that game. Other than that, Watson did not cost us a single game last year. With the above stated you are trying to say that it all lies on the offense. Well, we return two QBs with experience, a workhorse running back with another very talented one coming in, we are deep along the OL, and we have some young talent at the WR spots. SJB and Kenny Bell to be specific. It is not out of the realm of possibility to think that we will be better on offense next year.

Did you not watch the Big Ten last year and the year before? They are NOT better than us. There is not a team in that league that we can't beat. People, like you that think we will go 7-5 are flat out stupid. The schedule is not that much tougher next year if it is at all.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
EZ-E, we get it. You think the Big 10 sucks and unless the results on the field next year are contrary to that, nothing we say will probably sway your opinion. You live in Iowa and I am guessing have had some bad experiences with fans that has colored your opinion. I get it. I live in Lincoln and run into all kinds of arrogant Nebraska fans who thing the world revolves around the Cornhuskers and everyone else is beneath them. Those kinds of fans exist everywhere. However, in an effort to point out why some around here think that it might not be a cakewalk next year here is a stat for you:

1 vs. 5.

That is the number of the teams in the Big 12 that gave up more than 1600 yards rushing vs. the number of Big 10 teams that gave up that amount. And this is in a passing conference vs. a rushing conference. Care to guess where Nebraska gets most of its yards?

I do think that Nebraska has as much chance as any to win the division next year but given where Nebraska's strengths are vs. where their opponents strengths are, as well as the fact that every team you play next year will be an unfamiliar foe, it is certainly not going to be an easy road.

 
EZ-E, we get it. You think the Big 10 sucks and unless the results on the field next year are contrary to that, nothing we say will probably sway your opinion. You live in Iowa and I am guessing have had some bad experiences with fans that has colored your opinion. I get it. I live in Lincoln and run into all kinds of arrogant Nebraska fans who thing the world revolves around the Cornhuskers and everyone else is beneath them. Those kinds of fans exist everywhere. However, in an effort to point out why some around here think that it might not be a cakewalk next year here is a stat for you:

1 vs. 5.

 

That is the number of the teams in the Big 12 that gave up more than 1600 yards rushing vs. the number of Big 10 teams that gave up that amount. And this is in a passing conference vs. a rushing conference. Care to guess where Nebraska gets most of its yards?

I do think that Nebraska has as much chance as any to win the division next year but given where Nebraska's strengths are vs. where their opponents strengths are, as well as the fact that every team you play next year will be an unfamiliar foe, it is certainly not going to be an easy road.
Who cares about the bottom of the Big 10 vs. the bottom of the Big 12? The Big 10 had two of the top six rushing defenses in the nation. The Big 12 had zero of the top 20 rushing defenses. LINK

And the Big 10 faced better rushing teams. The Big 10 had four of the top 20 rushing teams. The Big 12 had one: Nebraska. LINK

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nuance - that is the point I was trying to make. The Big 10 had 5 teams give up less than 1600 yards rushing vs. the Big 12 only having 1 team give up that few yards. Just worded it backwards :( Thanks for fixing it for me :)

 
Nuance - that is the point I was trying to make. The Big 10 had 5 teams give up less than 1600 yards rushing vs. the Big 12 only having 1 team give up that few yards. Just worded it backwards :( Thanks for fixing it for me :)
Ha ha! Okay. It makes sense now!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top