You Martinez fanboys are zealots. I mean, real zealots. If anyone doesn't declare him God's Gift, you swarm and attack like zombies.
Here is Meyer's quote:
“It's right there. The two leagues are very comparable. I haven't watched them much, but last year I came home and watched them against Kansas State. That quarterback, (Taylor) Martinez, was one of the best athletes I've ever seen play. He dominated that game. I was shocked that he had a few games where he didn't play as well. I think if he plays like that, they have a great chance of winning the Big Ten.”
Q: What else do you see in Martinez's game that's impressive? What does he need to work on?
UM: “I haven't seen enough of him to make an educated evaluation. All I know is what I saw the times I did see him. I'd love to coach him. I can tell you that. He's a dynamic athlete with the ball in his hands, and that's the kind of guys that I like.”
What you have is basically Meyer saying he watched us play K State and witnessed one of the best performances by a quarterback he's ever seen. We can all agree with that. Unfortunately, that wasn't always the story with Martinez, was it? He blew a$$ against SDSU, Texas, and then ever single game after his injury.
If Meyer had bothered to sit down and watch the SDSU or Texas game, you think he'd feel the same way? Maybe if he'd bothered to watch those games he wouldn't be shocked when Martinez "had a few games where he didn't play as well."
This is what you Martinez nuts will never get: Yes the kid had some sensational plays last year, but he also had some unbelievably bad games. He was as bad against SDSU and Texas as he was good against K State and Okie State. When you average "terrible" with "sensational," what do you get?
No, really go ahead and take a few minutes to think it through.
Everybody has bad games. Urban Meyer's job as a coach is to look at bad games, figure out what needs to be fixed, and then help the kid fix it. But seeing one of Taylor's lesser performances isn't going to change Urban's mind concerning the kind of performance he had against Kansas State or Oklahoma State. He's going to take the bad with the good.
The problem on this board is that the discussion has gotten so polarized that the middle ground has basically disappeared. The Carnes fans can't admit that Taylor was unbelievably brilliant in several games last year, against BCS conference competition. Rather than come to the rather obvious and uncontroversial conclusion that his season tanked after and because of his injuries, they maintain that it was the fact we started playing good defenses (like the University of Kansas?). Furthermore, we know virtually nothing about Carnes' game, and any fan who says otherwise is simply delusional.
On the other hand, the Martinez fans think he's an absolute lock to be the starting QB and that it's completely ridiculous to even suggest that Carnes is a potential starter. However, Martinez has had some injury problems, he hasn't shown he can be a great QB without his top speed, and he has been ripped apart by the fans and the media over the past year, which would take a pretty big toll on most kids his age. He's not a lock for the job, and he will have to win it back.
Fact: Carnes looked better in the spring game than Martinez did
Fact: From a statistical standpoint, Taylor Martinez had inarguably the best freshman year of any QB ever to play at the University of Nebraska (including Tommie Frazier, Brook Berringer, Turner Gill, Scott Frost, and Eric Crouch).
Fact: Carnes fits the offense, and has demonstrated better passing mechanics than Martinez
Fact: Martinez, when healthy, is more explosive on the ground, and has a year of experience
Fact: Carnes has good high school tape, and was the scout team MVP (I think that's worthless, but I threw it in there for Hujan)
Fact: Martinez has demonstrated that he can be an effective QB at the Division 1A level.
As far as I can tell, people on this board seem to be leaning one way the other more or less because of the following reasons:
1. Their taste or lack thereof for running QBs
2. Their personal feelings regarding Martinez
Here's what I think: Carnes has a lot of potential and can be a very good player, and I think he might be better than a 90% healthy Martinez. But I think that Martinez at 100% was one of the most explosive, exciting players I've ever watched, and if he gets back to that kind of health, I want to see what he can do as a sophomore. He was inconsistent, but I'm completely willing to attribute that to his youth (imagine you're a freshman QB, and the first defense you see with top 25 speed is Texas, filled with the best athletes in the country, in Nebraska's biggest game since the last national championship bout... There's going to be a learning curve). It's pretty rare for a freshman QB to make as much noise as he did, whether it was against good defenses or not, and he did learn and improve from each bad game that he had last year (before his injuries).
I'm looking forward to the fall.