jsneb83 Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 9 hours ago, Notre Dame Joe said: Does anyone see a problem with a "Russian asset" giving weapons to Russia's opponent? It was voted on and passed by Congress. He had to give it to them, so might as well get something out of it. 2 Link to comment
jsneb83 Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 16 minutes ago, schriznoeder said: This is what I've been saying since the beginning. For someone who claims he is innocent, he is acting like a guilty person 2 Link to comment
Nebfanatic Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 39 minutes ago, schriznoeder said: Swalwell is good at making these punchy points. 3 Link to comment
commando Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 1 hour ago, BigRedBuster said: donnie needs to chill and watch an old movie 2 Link to comment
ActualCornHusker Posted December 18, 2019 Share Posted December 18, 2019 https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/474710-supreme-court-ruling-pulls-rug-out-from-under-article-of-impeachment?amp "Even if the high court were eventually to rule against the claims by President Trump, the fact that the justices decided to hear them, in effect, supports his constitutional contention that he had the right to challenge congressional subpoenas in court, or to demand that those issuing the subpoenas seek to enforce them through court. It undercuts the contention by House Democrats that President Trump committed an impeachable offense by insisting on a court order before sending possibly privileged material to Congress. Even before the justices granted review of these cases, the two articles of impeachment had no basis in the Constitution. They were a reflection of the comparative voting power of the two parties, precisely what one of the founders, Alexander Hamilton, warned would be the "greatest danger" of an impeachment." Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted December 18, 2019 Share Posted December 18, 2019 3 minutes ago, ActualCornHusker said: https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/474710-supreme-court-ruling-pulls-rug-out-from-under-article-of-impeachment?amp "Even if the high court were eventually to rule against the claims by President Trump, the fact that the justices decided to hear them, in effect, supports his constitutional contention that he had the right to challenge congressional subpoenas in court, or to demand that those issuing the subpoenas seek to enforce them through court. It undercuts the contention by House Democrats that President Trump committed an impeachable offense by insisting on a court order before sending possibly privileged material to Congress. Even before the justices granted review of these cases, the two articles of impeachment had no basis in the Constitution. They were a reflection of the comparative voting power of the two parties, precisely what one of the founders, Alexander Hamilton, warned would be the "greatest danger" of an impeachment." What a bunch of BS. 2 1 Link to comment
Notre Dame Joe Posted December 18, 2019 Share Posted December 18, 2019 10 hours ago, jsneb83 said: It was voted on and passed by Congress. He had to give it to them, so might as well get something out of it. or VETO 10 hours ago, jsneb83 said: This is what I've been saying since the beginning. For someone who claims he is innocent, he is acting like a guilty person Let me know when Trump destroys evidence with bleachbit. Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted December 18, 2019 Share Posted December 18, 2019 4 hours ago, Notre Dame Joe said: Let me know when Trump destroys evidence with bleachbit. How about if when he just flat out refuses to turn it over? 1 Link to comment
ZRod Posted December 18, 2019 Share Posted December 18, 2019 6 hours ago, Notre Dame Joe said: or VETO Let me know when Trump destroys evidence with bleachbit. And yet, that person still showed up in person to testify before congress... 5 Link to comment
Danny Bateman Posted December 18, 2019 Share Posted December 18, 2019 7 hours ago, Notre Dame Joe said: Let me know when Trump destroys evidence with bleachbit. Whining about HIllary isn't a strong defense of Trump, IMO. Just makes it seem like his supporters really have no defense at all. 9 Link to comment
QMany Posted December 18, 2019 Share Posted December 18, 2019 There's always a tweet. 3 1 Link to comment
knapplc Posted December 18, 2019 Author Share Posted December 18, 2019 This is a new one. The desperation the Republicans are showing to come up with excuses for Trump's behavior are astounding. 2 Link to comment
QMany Posted December 18, 2019 Share Posted December 18, 2019 18 minutes ago, knapplc said: This is a new one. The desperation the Republicans are showing to come up with excuses for Trump's behavior are astounding. On 11/27/2019 at 2:32 PM, QMany said: The bad-faith rationalizations are just lazy at this point. 4 Link to comment
knapplc Posted December 18, 2019 Author Share Posted December 18, 2019 And getting lazier! This is a clown show! 1 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts