Jump to content


Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/24/2021 in all areas

  1. So you want Frost to say something that no coach has ever said or would ever say? Mmmmkay. And you fail to acknowledge the obvious things he has been doing to effect change and to try to fix things? Double Mmmmkay.
    5 points
  2. He said, attempting to change the subject. I couldn't care less if they prosecute Waters. But trump very clearly spent months fomenting insurrection, and he was rightly impeached for it, and he's on his way to be tried by the Senate. His own words are enough to convict him. It's a slam dunk case. All that remains to be seen is if there are enough spines in the GOP to do the right thing.
    5 points
  3. I was responding a post stating that he didn't really offer any "plan" to getting things fixed. I'm in agreement. I never hear any real "plan", nor any real "discipline" or consequence [unless you want to say "you don't get to hike the ball for a half now"]. I have my own view and what I have done as a coach to fix problems ... so, I'm not critical of Scott or the coaching teams "plan" ... I still don't know what it is. The "plan" is the "motto/mantra". I would prefer Scott to be honest that he has tried to fix the problem ... and has not had success. I would like for him to express ... "this is kicking my @ss ... I need help ... my approach has not worked." I fully believe he will continue on the same path for the next three years. I'm still hopeful that basic blocking, sound tackling, disciplined football, and competent fundamental football will blossom ... but I see no plan for that to occur and I see no corrections that ensure that to occur ... so I can't really even be critical of the "plan". I am a frustrated fan ... as the key mistakes that lose the winnable games are all "fixable" according to Scott ... but he doesn't fix them. It would be different if he said they were not fixable ... but he says they are ... so, I'm waiting [and I feel I'm being critical of that lack of fulfillment of his word]. Pass
    3 points
  4. I feel you aren’t interested in learning anything. Your first reaction to seeing this should be what the starting points are. But you never seem to go to that next step. The US has the highest CO2 emmissions per capita in the world. To answer the idiot Tweeter, yes. In the agreement, countries can increase in total but decrease in intensity. That means countries like China will continue to increase for awhile. They are still developing as compared to some of the other countries. I think the agreement could probably be stricter but it definitely doesn’t seem fair to try to cap a country like India where they are. It would really halt their development, and they have far lower CO2 emmissions per capita than the U.S. Lastly, the U.S. didn’t exit until Nov. 2020, so that reduction happened while we were part of it.
    3 points
  5. At least hes not Trump, right? The good ole not Trump corruption and lies.
    2 points
  6. He attempted a coup and they are sticking with him, so ya.
    2 points
  7. trump could shoot someone on 5th avenue and his ssupporters would stick with him.
    2 points
  8. That he/you has to reach back months to find replacement evidence shows you don't have a case. Trump did not commit even a low crime or misdemeanor with his Jan 6th speech or any other.
    2 points
  9. 2 points
  10. The plan is this ... "we are gonna get this fixed" ... which has been repeated each of the last three years. This motto/mantra is getting to the equivalent of what a politician usually bleeds after getting put into office. If Scott entered into the Shark Tank, he would get eaten up and spit out ... especially by Kevin O'Leary [Mr. Wonderful]. I'm actually not a fan of Mr. O'Leary, but I'm taking on his type of attitude moving forward. Scott has his coaching staff, his guys [his own selections] ... so, both him and Moos no longer get a "pass" on "we are gonna get this fixed" ... IMHO.
    2 points
  11. I believe you charge every single one of them something. Even if it’s just trespassing.
    2 points
  12. You're trying to make an argument about a complete unknown. We'll never know if they would have been convicted on destroying evidence. The chargers aren't made up. Obstruction of Justice is a real thing, and it should have been up to the jury (with proper instruction) to make the determination of whether or not they were guilty. These companies should be scared of going out of buisness if they screw up. I can get fired, sued, go to jail if I screw up. Why shouldn't they be held to the same standard?
    2 points
  13. They can make excuses and say whatever they want. They are being painted as price gouging entities because they are price gouging entities. Red tape is a piss poor excuse. I work in Ag, the Obama administration implementation of the Veterinary Feed Directive was aimed at not allowing livestock to be jacked up with whatever drugs the farmer wanted to put in them. However, all it did was add red tape to those who need to give them simple drugs during seasonal issues and become more cost to the farmer.
    2 points
  14. LOL trump incited the insurrectionists beginning in at least December. 19 December – Be there, will be wild At 1.42am in the early hours of 19 December Trump tweeted the lie that it was “statistically impossible” for him to have lost the presidential election. He gave his first notice of a “big protest in DC” on 6 January. “Be there, will be wild!” he said. 19 December – The cavalry is coming Within hours, fervent Trump supporters began to heed Trump’s rallying cry. Kylie Jane Kremer, founder of a Stop the Steal group banned by Facebook, picked up the notice about the march and ran with it. “The calvary (sic) is coming, Mr President!” she said. Trump retweeted Kremer’s post, saying: “A great honor!” 1 January – You got to go to the streets and be violent Louie Gohmert, a Republican Congress member from Texas, responded in inflammatory terms to news that his federal lawsuit seeking to force the vice president Mike Pence to block certification of Joe Biden’s victory had been dismissed. “The bottom line is, the court is saying, ‘We’re not going to touch this. You have no remedy’,” he told the right-wing outlet Newsmax. “Basically, in effect, the ruling would be that you got to go to the streets and be as violent as Antifa.” 3 January – We will not go quietly into the night Ted Cruz, the US senator from Texas who became a leading proponent of challenging the electoral college vote in Congress to overturn Trump’s defeat, addressed a rally in Georgia. “We will not go quietly into the night. We will defend liberty. And we are going to win.” 5 January – They will be primaried Eric Trump, the president’s son, made a direct political threat to any Republican member of Congress who dared vote in favor of Biden’s electoral college victory at the following day’s ceremonial joint session. “I will personally work to defeat every single Republican Senator / Congressman who doesn’t stand up against this fraud – they will be primaried in their next election and they will lose.” Took less than 30 seconds to google. Try at least a little bit, please.
    2 points
  15. My personal favorite is the hospital is in network but the ER doctor or the surgeon are out of network. Sorry pal youre on your own.
    2 points
  16. I feel the same about it never happening again if Frost doesn't get it rolling soon. Who would we even hire next? He will get 5+ years for sure, and longer if Moos isn't canned or retires. I honestly expected recruiting to fall off with another losing season in 2020 but the whole year was a pass in general. I think it definitely will without progress in 21 as you say. Make or break year for the program, even if Frost will continue on regardless.
    1 point
  17. Looks like we’re seeing the same things. I would add dumping a couple “buddies” he originally brought with. Sorry, I just get tired of people confusing not making any changes with those changes not actually yielding results. (Not saying this is you) but that attitude did precipitate my initial comment. Im not happy with how things have gone and I have a lot more doubts now than I did 1 or 2 or 3 years ago. But I don’t think a 3rd year effed up with Covid is a particularly good time to draw too many conclusions. I do think the results have to show this coming season though. I’m probably in a little different boat than most. I no longer have any desire to see this program through yet another coaching change whether or not it is needed. I’m convinced that if a guy like Frost can’t get it done then it likely won’t happen. The result of way too many years of being let down time and time again.
    1 point
  18. Seems like he has been actively looking for a school “anywhere but Lincoln”. And honestly, that’s okay. If he feels he needs to go somewhere else to spread his wings I get that and wouldn’t hold it against him. You only live once. He needs to follow his heart.
    1 point
  19. Actually Oregon has a shot to get him we dont
    1 point
  20. I would rather split it. I want Dickerson because we would control the State if Nebraska and he is a really good one. Hate letting the really good in-state kids slip away. Then get one more player from portal who is ready to play.
    1 point
  21. Dude, I literally just quoted and linked you Rehnquist's opinion... The SC didn't rule on the charges brought. They ruled on whether or not the instructions provided to the jury were proper. Much of what is quote in Rehnquist's opinion would very easily lead one to believe that had the instructions been correct the Supreme Court would have upheld a guilty verdict. He essentially wrote how AA corruptly destroyed documents and then laid out an argument for how to get a conviction, then said it wasn't pertinent to the case currently before them. So does what AA did seem above board to you?
    1 point
  22. There is no way this team is less talented at WR than last year. Young, injured, & distracted (in the case of Omar Manning) perhaps. But not less talented.
    1 point
  23. Ugh, don't put a 3-year average as the last point on a line graph!
    1 point
  24. I’m glad they are at least stating they will make changes. But a lot of this stuff needed to be done after last year. Hope it’s not too little too late.
    1 point
  25. You're such a bulls#!t artists. Arthur Anderson would have gone down from the WorldCom scandal even if they made it through Enron. Plus most of the partners created new companies almost immediately after they surrendered their license. Those jobs were never lost, they just moved to new companies or were absorbed by other existing companies. Minus Enron the need for that work formerly on their books didn't just vanish.
    1 point
  26. The bill wasn’t signed by Trump until Dec. 27. They attempted to change the $600 to $2,000 throughout December. That leaves like 9 days of campaigning where they could have mentioned $2,000 but I’ve known based on what they tried to pass and using their actual words for weeks now they have been talking about $2,000 total this entire time. It was never the plan to do $2,000 on top of $600.
    1 point
  27. Toure + Stepp and maybe one other transfer will help spark the offense a lot. We really, really need a spring and summer for max development.
    1 point
  28. Last night I re-watched the Rutgers game, for the first time. Without the stress of winning or losing, Adrian looked really good. He seems to do some awkward things that other top Qbs do not do. His straight run to the sideline was really odd. Sliding short of the first down vs. Purdue. His fumbles in the Rutgers game were after great runs. I think it is all mental for him right now. If the pieces around him can help him relax and take pressure off, he will be very special again.
    1 point
  29. Last season Adrian was a very efficient deep passer and it was "Adrian needs to stop trying to hit a home run every play and learn to take the singles that are there." Now that he completed 70 percent of his passes and showed real growth in reading coverages, it's "Adrian can't throw deep." He needs to take better care of the ball, but this dude can't win with some of you.
    1 point
  30. He's staying with his original commitment. Minny will get him. Time to move on!! Wish him the best. Can't blame a young man for wanting to spread their wings and fly away. GL to you Avante!
    1 point
  31. With reduced capacity and a speed up of vaccinations I don’t see any reason why we can’t do this
    1 point
  32. I was waiting for the MFA response which is why I put in “actual socialized medicine” because MFA would not be.
    1 point
  33. My current concern is that the elderly are going to be among the first vaccinated, then anti-vaxxers will come out of the woodwork to talk about how many die but not take into account the deaths from other causes.
    1 point
  34. I think this is all that's going on. Something to keep in mind is that it's not just about the vaccine working in trials but also that the production system makes the vaccine correctly and safely.
    1 point
  35. Britian already vaccinating people. A country with actual socialized medicine is outperforming us...again.
    1 point
  36. @Archy1221 posted: Ironic that the typo in your post makes it literally say the opposite of what you meant.
    1 point
  37. Youre right Archy, they dont just come out and say “we wont cover heart attacks”. That would be incredibly stupid, right. Insurance companies are smarter than that. They say this hopsital and that hospital are out of network. They say ambulance rides are out of network. They say this procedure and that procedure are not covered. Thats how they get away with it. Or the paperwork was bad. Or there was no pre-authorization form that was needed. Or they require a procedure that is less expensive that really isnt what is needed. There are so many things insurance companies do to get out of paying a bill that its unbeleivable. Its happened to me with UnitedHealthcare. Its happpened to ky wife where they call and question her about her illness. Im sure its happened to many on this board. I guess it hasnt happened to you, but when it does it will piss you off.
    1 point
  38. I'm sorry @Archy1221, but I'm not going to let you shift the conversation the way you would like. Thank you for taking the time to utilize right wing talking points to attempt to absolve republican lawmakers from their active sabotage of the ACA. And I truly mean that. I know it took you some time to do so. However, please explain to me what you feel the right wing intent of these acts of obstruction of the law was and the ultimate legislative impact they were trying to achieve on the meta-level.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to Chicago/GMT-05:00

Visit the Sports Illustrated Husker site



×
×
  • Create New...