Jump to content


'SkersRule

Banned
  • Posts

    1,298
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by 'SkersRule

  1. Not to derail the thread into a political discussion, but I do find it rather interesting that the resident liberals here didn't post any messages decrying my "politicalization" of a football thread. Hmmm. Could it be that I used a picture of someone they absolutely hated in a funny way which makes said politicalization acceptable? Naw that couldn't be! The liberals on this site are 100% objective. I sure wish there was a puking emoticon to convey the level of digust. And here comes the libs in 3 2 1 to chastize me for pointing out their obvious hypocrisy.
  2. Are you secretly getting some kind of magical Huskerboard circle jerk points for making comments like this? This is a forum. An anonymous forum. For discussing Husker football. On the internet. Husker football is being discussed. Uh oh walks...this guy is on to you...sharper than a Polish hunting knife he is...
  3. Well he's done a better job than Mike Sherman.
  4. Well I wasn't looking for it, but it did kind of pop up and say "hello." Sometimes my attention to detail is a detriment. I still think he was just trying to cover his ears, as in stop the noise. In future posts I'll up my level of attention to detail. Thanks for pointing it out though. I was wondering what you meant by editing. After looking at the picture for a few minutes I thought you were talking about the message. No the message came through loud and clear. It was the "attachment" that caused the . LOL. Either way, we derailed the thread. Mission accomplished. Indeed.
  5. Well I wasn't looking for it, but it did kind of pop up and say "hello." Sometimes my attention to detail is a detriment. I still think he was just trying to cover his ears, as in stop the noise. In future posts I'll up my level of attention to detail. Thanks for pointing it out though. I was wondering what you meant by editing. After looking at the picture for a few minutes I thought you were talking about the message. No the message came through loud and clear. It was the "attachment" that caused the . LOL.
  6. Well I wasn't looking for it, but it did kind of pop up and say "hello." Sometimes my attention to detail is a detriment.
  7. I think that picture needs to be "edited" a lot more.
  8. If I explain it, are you going to accuse me of over analyzing something in another post that is a contender for the strangest thing I've seen on this board in a long time? Edit - And I'm serious. That guy's response to me, and your response to me, are two of the oddest things I've seen around here in years. It's hard to tell if it's serious, or trolling, or...? All the above?
  9. Or his paying for football equipment for a local Detroit high school. Suh isn't perfect, no one is.
  10. I love the Ohio St drunkards slobbering all over themselves after they beat Nebraska. Here are the facts: 1. Urban Meyer is a cheap opportunist who will fail miserably once the previous coach's recruits are gone. 2. Once Braxton Miller leaves Urban will need to "retire" again for health or family reasons because his recruits will suck. 3. In about two more seasons 90% of Ohio State players will start showing up on the police blotter just like they did at Florida. It doesn't matter how much you polish a turd because it's still a turd. And in this case Urban Meyer is the turd. Urban wins and does well with other coach's players. Once he gets his own players, well you saw what he did at Florida after Tebow left.
  11. Aside from a miracle? Start by getting much more aggressive on defense, particularly with the DL. Northwestern has receivers that are pretty much equal to what we have. The difference is they have not one, but two, mobile quarterbacks who can both throw far better than Braxton Miller. I hope I'm wrong, but I honestly think Nebraska is going to get hammered badly in this game.
  12. Lo, I wish that it was more complex than "just win" but that's really all it amounts to. And since we all know that going undefeated every year is impossible that means we will have losses. However, when the team does lose, they can't lose by 20+ points, go -3 in turnovers, give up a punt return for a TD, and look incompetent. I'm still in Bo's corner and believe he's the guy we need. But another weak performance against Northwestern, or any other team this season, will start me to rethink my support.
  13. Here's the thing with people like the OP...the only "big game" in his mind is the one Nebraska loses.
  14. Watch...tschu won't get warned or banned for his blatant stupidity but I will for calling him on it.
  15. Easy to blame the defense, but the defense was like 1% responsible for that loss (Matt O'Hanlon being that sole 1%) Good God you're dumb. Selectively scapegoat much? 1. It was Matt O' Hanlon who chased down the Va Tech WR after the CB (Blue) mistakenly let the WR go because the CB thought he was playing zone. 2. Our defense had no less than 5 chances to win the game against the Hokies after Blue's huge coverage gaffe. To blame O'Hanlon for the loss to Va Tech in Blacksburg demonstrates a disturbingly stupid lack of football knowledge and comprehension of what actually occurred in the game. Go back and rewatch the last three minutes. Nebraska lost that game but it was NOT because of Matt O' Hanlon. And I'm not sorry because I'm fully intending to be every bit the d*** I'm coming across as in my post here. It just chaps my ass to no end when I read a post from someone whose basic ignorance of the facts is so far askew that they make Mark May and Lou Holtz seem like intellignet commentators. Watch the freaking game, recognize what actually happened in reality...AND THEN TRY TO MAKE A SEMI INTELLIGENT COMMENT.
  16. I hope he dyes his fro pink. I'd give $500 to some breast cancer awareness group if he would do that...
  17. And.....? And? I think it's fairly obviously. We're actively recruiting another Micah Kriekmeyer...a 5 year bench warming wasted scholarship.
×
×
  • Create New...