HuskerPowerVA

After all these years, I hope some have learned it is is more than the coach, (past, present or next one) that is the solution or the problem.

I don’t think this is the program someone is really looking at to rebuild their brand and launch into a HC. Better bet and more realistic idea would be a “young” offensive mind with new ideas and energy.

Why would anyone feel those who voted zero didn’t mean it? Was it the win vs. Buffalo or Fordham that has them optimistic?

Interesting concept and I could easily see it. Maybe all the Texas schools not named UT or A&M in the same division to create a intrastate interests - Baylor, Tech, TCU, Houston and maybe even SMU.

Wait a second. I just logged in after a long time and some think we are going to the Big 12, 11, 10 9...Conference? Yes I am too lazy to read all the threads, but I am drinking my favorite beer and smoking my favorite cigar. Go back to a league that is in jeopardy of at best being a shadow of its former average self? That’s would be like taking a life boat off a perfectly good ship to row heavy seas to board the Titanic. Around here today the talk is WVU looking toward the ACC.

Its called the judicial process. It was a felony. So now do I have to explain the investigatory process: probable cause, what a preliminary hearing does, and the arriagnment? It should have been filed. If a deal is made or a trail finds the facts call for lesser punishment or none at all is when that discretion is made.

Like they say, some of the dumbest kids in school went on to teach public school. Glad you sustained the image.

You are a sad little man who would never act tough away from a keyboard. If you are too lazy to go back and read, thats your issue.

If you keep a video of a 15 year old and send it years later, yes, you are. Sorry technology is an excuse for you to be a creep.

Thanks for providing a comparison that proves that you have zero grasp of anything written here.

You might be surprised.

Clearly your entire knowledge of the legal system comes from Google search. He is not being charged by federal guidelines. Laws should change because we have cell phones? LOL!!! BY that reasoning we should have changed them when we developed cameras. If you can read, the answers are clearly stated above.

No, he sent child porn. Sorry you don't like it but he was deviant.

I would say you are an a$$hole if you think what he did was anything but disgusting.

Age of consent differs between states. The youngest in America is 16. Child pornography laws thankfully do not take this same stance when it involves distribution for obvious reasons. For those unaware, sending it over your phone qualifies. The totality of the circumstances drive the sentences issued as well as if they will be placed on the sex offender registry. He won't be viewed as a predator by the court, but innocent or something that should be legal, glad we live in different states.

I have no problem with you being an ardent defender of due process and wishing that no punishment is brought forth until that system is exhausted. The NFL has the same issue of league punishment vs legal process. I do have an issue if the reason you defend him is because a football team needs him to win games. PS - I don't think being against him doing this is setting the morality bar very high. Don't run under it.

Here is what I do know: Number one - it's not fake outrage. I really do think he is a scumbag for doing it. What you are sick of is immaterial. Number two - I hope you are not a parent. Number three - It has not been proven to be a rape. If you read the posts that is what we were saying. Number four - Yes, it was something he sent, he sent child pornography. Maybe you don't know that a 15 year old qualifies. He is either stupid or didn't care. Number five - Do I think he is a pedo? Not at all by this alone. I do think he is immature and lacks basic sense and morality for possessing and sending child porn. The fact he kept a video like that when she is was that young shows he is a creep.

I don't think he is either, of course I don't know him, but I doubt it. I do know that pedophiles start early and often are not caught for decades. That is why the law is the way it is written.

Well that's not the law and thank goodness for that.

She was immediately able to identify it as child porn based on the age of those who were exposed in the video, male or female. Being the same age as them doesn't matter and she knew that.

If he didn't, he is beyond stupid. When this first was publicized, I asked my daughter, who is in the 7th grade, a hypothetical without names or leading questions regarding someone keeping a video of 15 year old girl having sex. No mention of rape. She is advanced in her intellect, but she instantly said, almost verbatum, "They are sick losers for doing that and it is illegal because anyone who keeps or shares photos or videos of kids naked or having sex are possessing and sharing child pornography. When I asked her how she knew these things she said kids are aware of the ways you can get into trouble with text messages or social media and only the dumbest or those don't care do things like that. She also said the girl was lacking self esteem for doing it.

For once we agree about an aspect of this issue. It is certainly far more disgusting to send someone a video of them being raped than a sex tape.. One is in poor taste and the other is sick and evil. Will we ever know whether he truly thought it was a consensual video or rape? Not sure they will be able to prove it, but I am sure not as much benefit of the doubt would be granted in here to a student who was not a top player on the football team. Still very comfortable with anyone having a video on their phone that depicts a 15 year old having sex. Not sure how anyone fails to realize that is child pornography that should be erased immediately.

HIs employment as HC isn't anywhere near in question. Those who think it is I am curious what you think the plan would be moving forward? This program was always more than two seasons away from being as competitive as we want (or what was foolishly predicted by some this year).

I am very interested in seeing the chip on the shoulder of the o-line in Colorado. Within every team there are two teams, well three with special teams, but they are always an inbreeding mixture of starters, backups, walk-ons and both sides of the ball. What I am talking about is the offense and defense are distinct entities on any team. It will be made PAINFULLY clear that the defense and special teams carried all the weight yesterday for the offense. Practices will be intense and they will be constantly reminded that not only did the defense have to stop the other team, they had to do the scoring. The offense will be told they won't get a day off in a while because they had one Saturday. Trust me, it motivates and ticks you off more than one might think as the competition and pride between the two sides of the ball is intense. SF will challenge their will and their toughness this week. Whether they respond is up to them. Yes, AM had a bad game and exactly why remains unclear, but being able to run to set up the pass is critical and they just got pushed around on Saturday. That impacts timing, momentum, confidence and play calling. The kids in Boulder are not elite, but they will be another tier compared to the Jags.