JJ Husker

@ZRod I don't think it's the smartest thing to do, but then I think they should have had whatever meeting they had with whatever doctors convinced them to play a couple of weeks ago, too. This rapid-testing they're using has been available for more than a month.

I guess I understand (not accept) the delayed meeting but to finally have the meeting, approve the season, and then set it for 6 weeks out. Why, why was the 5.5+ week delay necessary?

My theory is twofold. They're arrogant and stubborn and wanted it to look more like what they had determined previously. And number 2, more arrogance and stubbornness, they're secretly hoping they can once again cancel by that later date, to validate their earlier decision. Why else wait more than 2 or 3 weeks to get it going? Am I failing to see something?

@knapplc I've kind of moved more towards it's probably ok to play ball (some what selfishly, but sports can be done safely). I don't think the crowds are a good idea because people are stupid and don't follow rules.

But really the B1G screwed the pooch on this and no matter what they do they look like bumbling idiots. No leadership and no clear direction after an entire summer to make a plan, or set some requirements before play could happen. From supposedly one of the more accademic power 5 conferences.