Jump to content

khaake

Members
  • Content Count

    269
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

209 Excellent

About khaake

  • Rank
    Three-Star Recruit

Recent Profile Visitors

3,743 profile views
  1. One thing about Mills... I haven't seen anything from him to suggest that he's very explosive. He does remind me of Ozigbo a little bit, but he's had a hard time making the first person miss.
  2. Nebraska: 34 Colorado: 27 Rushing: 181 Passing: 241
  3. The O-line looked bad. The defense looked a little better, but this was against South Alabama. I sincerely hope our D-line hasn't been getting talked up this fall simply because they've been practicing against a bad o-line. I expect our offense to get better as the year goes on, but they did not play well today at all.
  4. On a positive note, our defense does seem to hold some promise. Keep that up, guys.

  5. Umm, anyone else concerned about the O-line?

    1. Show previous comments  6 more
    2. Cdog923

      Cdog923

      I have been for about 6 months now

       

    3. macroboy

      macroboy

      Not gonna lie. Qb play is pretty unimpressive as well.

    4. JJ Husker

      JJ Husker

      Yeah, this is the worst 2AM has ever looked

  6. Hey, it's game week, guys!

  7. Scandalous! Oh how far we have fallen.
  8. Speaking of echo chamber - this was just put out by their campaign. It's breathtaking how effortlessly Trump and his cohorts lie.
  9. Twitter is crazy right now. It is obvious that the Trump and GOP strategy is to get the echo chamber going with "No Collusion and No Obstruction" as loudly as possible, when the report itself does not appear to support that. We are a country divided into two different realities.
  10. True, they have been very critical of the West, and haven't had a lot of publications aimed at China (or Russia). But at the same time, they were based in the West and so to some extent I think that can be expected. I'm not going to try to argue that they weren't an asset of Russia - maybe they were, and I have no way to know. But on the other had we haven't seen actual evidence to that effect yet, have we?
  11. I think that is the common perception, but generally speaking it doesn't hold a lot of water. Here is the wikipedia list of their publications: Wikileaks Publications
  12. Good questions. For what it is worth the stated reason for the US extraditing Assange is due to activities in 2010 - not the Clinton email case. This was part of it.
  13. Valid points. I agree that the line has to be drawn someplace. But in this case I don't think we were talking about a publisher breaking into a personal computer of a private individual to expose their information publicly. Instead we were talking about a publisher obtaining information about what governments were up to. There seems to be a difference there.
  14. It is awkward. People have various reasons for hating Assange, but I'm worried about the potential long term ramifications of this action. Eventually more info will come out, though.
×
×
  • Create New...