-
Posts
314 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Articles
Media Demo
Posts posted by Bad2theBONES
-
-
Ah dang didn’t see we already had him. My bad
- 1
-
-
Callahan just tweeted he was N and now the tweet is no longer there.
-
1 minute ago, Alamo City Husker said:
Brother man, are you dense? If you are on "LE" you are on one side, aka prosecutors, aka state, aka plaintiff. What that means is that, you are not on the DEFENDANTS side, aka person arrested, aka the accused. Did I color that within the lines suffice for you to have the old synapses fire up buddy?
Did you forget that two times already I said I “used” to be in LE? Do you know what I do today? I could be a defense attorney for all you know. GTFOH
-
1 minute ago, Alamo City Husker said:
"Mrs. Joseph’s cryptic “the truth will set you free” tweet may be making more sense"
Let your brain balls drop little homie. There were two sentences up in there bud. #OffYourHighHorseYouGoYou called me privileged knowing nothing about me except that I used to be in law enforcement. Me get off my high horse. Just give up and stop having to have the last word. You keep making yourself look dumber each time.
- 2
-
3 minutes ago, Alamo City Husker said:
Thank you for proving my point. You are speaking from one side only.
I said I “used to be in LE” so you’re just an idiot and I’m not speaking one one side. You just don’t know your head from your a$$ and are trying to comment things you have zero clue on. Read a book.
- 1
- 1
-
1 hour ago, Alamo City Husker said:
I've have been telling people the same thing! #WinnerWinnerChickenDinner
If you knew anything about the law works, you would know it didn’t happen a while back or else they would have been “serving a warrant” and that isn’t what the media release said happened.
- 3
-
43 minutes ago, Alamo City Husker said:
This is nonsense. Obviously, someone who has never been in the "system". #PrivilegedPeople
If only you knew what you were talking about #ignorantdumbasses
- 1
- 2
-
1 hour ago, Born N Bled Red said:
So a headlock, if someone is screaming and you cover their mouth, there are so many different ways these could be achieved. Every wrestler would be guilty of this, as written, nearly every match.
It also does not say that the victim would need to be to the point of passing out or even lightheadedness, but the action of applying pressure is the crime.
Which completely contradicts what you said to me originally when you said they simply had to put their arms around their neck. No, they have to apply pressure, like I said.
-
2 hours ago, krc1995 said:
So I looked this up because I wondered the same and I think it means having an intimate relationship with. So obviously doesn’t have to be his wife
28-323.
Domestic assault; penalties.
(1) A person commits the offense of domestic assault in the third degree if he or she:
(a) Intentionally and knowingly causes bodily injury to his or her intimate partner;
For purposes of this section, intimate partner means a spouse; a former spouse; persons who have a child in common whether or not they have been married or lived together at any time; and persons who are or were involved in a dating relationship. For purposes of this subsection, dating relationship means frequent, intimate associations primarily characterized by the expectation of affectional or sexual involvement, but does not include a casual relationship or an ordinary association between persons in a business or social context.
-
1 hour ago, MyBloodIsRed16 said:
Maybe he choked his Mother-in-law
28-323.
Domestic assault; penalties.
(1) A person commits the offense of domestic assault in the third degree if he or she:
(a) Intentionally and knowingly causes bodily injury to his or her intimate partner;
For purposes of this section, intimate partner means a spouse; a former spouse; persons who have a child in common whether or not they have been married or lived together at any time; and persons who are or were involved in a dating relationship. For purposes of this subsection, dating relationship means frequent, intimate associations primarily characterized by the expectation of affectional or sexual involvement, but does not include a casual relationship or an ordinary association between persons in a business or social context.
-
1 hour ago, Born N Bled Red said:
As a wrestler, it's just where my mind went when reading the statute. A headlock (which is a wrestling move) is not uncommon position to be in if there was an altercation or scrap.
I also do not automatically assume the victim was his wife, as some here have already decided upon. Could very well have been another male in his household.
Final thing to remember, the damn media is in it for the clicks. They will post the most salacious language possible, rather than let the truth come out every time. It is better for business.
you should probably just stop commenting on something you are so absolutely clueless about.
No it isn’t a male in the house, smdh
Domestic assault; penalties.
(1) A person commits the offense of domestic assault in the third degree if he or she:
(a) Intentionally and knowingly causes bodily injury to his or her intimate partner;
For purposes of this section, intimate partner means a spouse; a former spouse; persons who have a child in common whether or not they have been married or lived together at any time; and persons who are or were involved in a dating relationship. For purposes of this subsection, dating relationship means frequent, intimate associations primarily characterized by the expectation of affectional or sexual involvement, but does not include a casual relationship or an ordinary association between persons in a business or social context.- 1
-
1 minute ago, Bad2theBONES said:
Straight from the statute.
(8) For purposes of this section, intimate partner means a spouse; a former spouse; persons who have a child in common whether or not they have been married or lived together at any time; and persons who are or were involved in a dating relationship. For purposes of this subsection, dating relationship means frequent, intimate associations primarily characterized by the expectation of affectional or sexual involvement, but does not include a casual relationship or an ordinary association between persons in a business or social context.
28-323.
Domestic assault; penalties.
(1) A person commits the offense of domestic assault in the third degree if he or she:
(a) Intentionally and knowingly causes bodily injury to his or her intimate partner;
- 1
-
7 minutes ago, Toe said:
Question: Per LPD's Twitter, MJ was arrested for "domestic assault". Does that definitely imply that the victim was a member of his household, or could it have been someone else who was at his home or something?
Straight from the statute.
(8) For purposes of this section, intimate partner means a spouse; a former spouse; persons who have a child in common whether or not they have been married or lived together at any time; and persons who are or were involved in a dating relationship. For purposes of this subsection, dating relationship means frequent, intimate associations primarily characterized by the expectation of affectional or sexual involvement, but does not include a casual relationship or an ordinary association between persons in a business or social context.
- 1
-
13 minutes ago, Born N Bled Red said:
Thank you for this however I was given contradicting information from a currently employed pd investigator.
His words, "they changed the strangulation statute a few years ago. You just have to put your hands around someones neck now. And it's a class 4 felony."
The statutes wording is the statutes wording. I can guarantee the wording isn’t what you stated above. It takes more than putting your hands around their neck. At the end of the day it is all on what the county attorney/prosecutor in that area has communicated to Chiefs and Captains on what type of training is necessary for their officers and ehar evidence is necessary for them to prosecute the cases. More than likely this high profile of a case, it is common for a Sgt or Captain on scene to make a direct call to the county attorney and tell them the facts and they would be told right then if they had enough to arrest or not. Current statue would indicate pressure must be applied and simply putting the hands around the neck is not enough like you claim.
Assault by strangulation or suffocation; penalty; affirmative defense.
(1) A person commits the offense of assault by strangulation or suffocation if the person knowingly and intentionally:
(a) Impedes the normal breathing or circulation of the blood of another person by applying pressure on the throat or neck of the other person; or
(b) Impedes the normal breathing of another person by covering the mouth and nose of the person.
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
As a previous LE officer in NE. The statute of strangulation doesn’t mean the victim has to be choked out cold. Hands around the neck are not enough to be charged. The action has to prevent oxygen flow to the victim. Marks around the neck are one of many things that could be used as probable cause for an arrest, but red marks by themselves are not enough. Officers are also supposed to look for red marks and bruising around the victim’s neck in the shape of fingers/hands. Witnesses can’t just say his hands were around the victim’s neck, but a witness would have to say the victim’s face was turning purple or the witness must be confident the victim couldn’t breath (example: when the suspect let’s go of the victim’s neck, the victim could be heard gasping for air). One of the biggest signs of strangulation and lack of oxygen is looking at a victim’s eyes. Specifically, any petechiae (red dots) in the white of the eyes is evidence of a sever lack of oxygen. Also important to note that the victim does not have a say so in the state of nebraska on whether or not they want to charge their loved one (suspect) with domestic violence. Police don’t ask the victim if they want to press charges and it is not the victim’s decision. Domestic violence is one of the ONLY statues in the state of NE in which even the officer has absolutely no discretion whether or not an arrest is made. The statue says if there is probable cause the officer “shall” make the arrest and if they don’t make the arrest the officer can be charged with a crime.
- 4
- 5
- 1
- 3
-
33 minutes ago, Skerygood said:
Its not gonna be Rhule. I wish it were true but I just wouldnt be making tv appearances in nfl studios 4-5 days before you take over a program. You study film of your opponents and recruits. Learn the 500 mile radius. Get your staff together because yours is still at Carolina. Not sell yourself on nfl network and talk about past mistakes and what ya could've done differently. Who's next on the board?
This is B.S. why would he not take every opportunity to sell himself. This will only help with recruiting when he gets here.
- 2
- 1
- 1
-
He is following Rhule now again and also
- Lance
- Dave D
- Luke F
- Matt Campbell -
Peed just stopped following Rhule.
- 2
-
2 minutes ago, M.A. said:
Rhule hasn't posted anything on Twitter in over a year.
About seven days ago he tweets this. Very cool story a coach shares with his team!
Nfl coaches don’t need to have a social media presence l, they don’t recruit. Interesting time to get back on Twitter after all this time….
- 1
-
7 minutes ago, Husker816 said:
Who's that?
He is one of the biggest boosters and is fully funding the 1890 Initiative for our NIL that Matt Davidson is running.
- 1
-
Shawn Peed started following Matt Rhule today on Twitter.
He follows 800 people.
Bo Pelini and Scott Frost are the only other head college football head coaches he follows on Twitter- 1
- 3
-
I believe Trev has been telling separate individuals within his athletic department some specific pieces of inaccurate information to see if it spreads as rumor. Finding out who the leakers are. There has been issues within for quite some time and he is straightening that up as well. I have faith in him.
- 1
- 3
-
19 minutes ago, Husker816 said:
What's that mean?
It means a coach has been hired and shut down recruiting until he gets in there.
- 4
Spring Game Morning
in Husker Football
Posted
What time and what network on tv?