I've always backed up my claims with data/statistics/evidence, or past history. You just choose to say it's irrelevant or meaningless to suit your purpose. As far as your questions, the only one who comes to mind is Hugh Freeze at Ole Miss, although we know now that he did it illegally. But again, you're missing the point. If we don't get a big name like Meyer or Deion - and we're not - we need someone who will be capable of recruiting top classes. Not overnight, but in the years that follow. Guys like Klieman, Campbell, and Leipold have not shown that they're capable of doing that. Yeah I know people say it's harder to recruit to their current spots, but moving to Lincoln isn't suddenly going to make any of them a better recruiter, despite our resources.
As far as the other question you asked, I'm just trying to show you that you're not always right. Many, MANY times over the past decade I've made statements that turned out to be true, yet at the time I was told how wrong and pessimistic I was being. The Chinander thing is an example. Yet not one single time have I ever seen you admit that you were wrong. Instead you twist things or you say "I don't recall that/that wasn't me" and that I'm just trying to get a pat on the back, etc. That's why debating with you is pointless.