Jump to content


Archy1221

Members
  • Posts

    14,631
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    271

Everything posted by Archy1221

  1. Thinking about this further, even if some skinhead dork/loser put 100% on a shirt, all that would make me think, is that he’s a 100% douche!
  2. Well, it depends on how many and who the some people are along with whether or not the racism is fake or not.
  3. Did you say something? I must have missed it
  4. We as a society need to do a better job of calling our real racism, and stop trying to create fake racism to push some agenda.
  5. If by ghosts, you mean posters on this board, then, well, yes I would agree. That’s actually “not it”. Because you know what happens next. Next time someone the everything is racist bros don’t like uses 100% for something, that crowd then states it a dog whistle. Next thing ya know people need to not use 100% out of respect for the marginalized community. Same s#!t happened with the okay hand symbol.
  6. Nope, actually Ron knows how to get things done for the betterment of his citizens when he is in charge. Something Trump had a problem with.
  7. Ehhhhh, the ADL is way out on its skis with this one. 50 plus 50 is 100 and that’s not racist. Using, I’m committed 100% is not racist. Answering a question about liking something with 100% is not racist. Just because some nitwits are using 100% and combining it with racist terminology, then that is racist and it’s hard not to see that for what it is. The ADL is acting like we shouldn’t use 100% because racists are using it now and it gives them credence. That’s just plain silly. Just like the ok symbol. People claim every white person who does the okay symbol is flashing a racist sign. Gimme a break.
  8. So since this instance was a focal point of John’s show, one would think he would retroactively pay the city for the lost property taxes John evaded by not matching the true property value better with the assessed value while he owned it. In the interest of fiscal conservatism, which it sounds like you care deeply about, it’s also possible a prosecutor might take a few high profile examples like this and use them as a loss leader (who knows, it’s very possible the prosecutors office comes out ahead in monetary value) while winning some civil verdicts so other wealthy millionaire celebrities not “paying their fair share” may be proactive in the future and get their properties re-assessed thereby bringing in more revenue thereby having a net positive overall. And since we know Governments don’t really care about fiscal conservatism, if nothing else, wealthy millionaire Democrats finally get to pay their fair share of property taxes!
  9. Yep, instead the primary voters wanted a battle of 80yr olds.
  10. They looked up the records A bank loan doesn’t matter in terms of property value. I’m sure you are aware, a mortgage isn’t required to have an assessed tax value. Leticia Jane’s should be all over this. NY lost money here. Amirite
  11. How much in property taxes did NY lose by John not making sure the assessed value better match up with the true value. We don’t know if John took loans out or not btw.
  12. This is too rich and quite funny. https://nypost.com/2024/03/27/real-estate/jon-stewart-found-to-have-overvalued-his-nyc-home-by-829/ Records also show that Stewart paid significantly lower property taxes, which were calculated based on that assessor valuation price — precisely what he called Trump out for doing in his Monday monologue. Meanwhile, the New York assessor valuation on Stewart’s former penthouse is the exact same citation method and metric that New York Attorney General Letitia James used to value Trump’s private and personal properties, and then sued him for inflating those assets.
  13. Honestly I don’t love the guy. I’m already married and not looking around. I do support him as a politician though. He would be light years better than either option in front of us. And all the rage farming against him the past few years has turned out to be false. Funny to watch happen in real time.
  14. Primary voters wanted an 80 yr old. Too bad. We could have had someone better.
  15. yesterday was the first day of public trading for ticker DJT https://apnews.com/article/trump-media-truth-social-nasdaq-stock-106d7c423174ca1d7cc3cc9a3f3897a0
  16. That was the first day of trading for the stock. Many many many stocks shoot up on its inaugural trading day. I wouldn’t invest in it.
  17. Interesting that the poster who tried to dunk of Florida for having a “measles outbreak” of a few cases hasn’t mentioned this little nugget of info https://chicago.suntimes.com/health/2024/03/26/measles-cases-chicagos-outbreak-cdph-health-pilsen-immigration-migrants-city-hall-vaccine-shots
  18. Once again, the Looney Left thinks just about everything is racist.
  19. Yes they are taking the brunt of the SCOTUS ruling. But everyone forgets that it was the correct ruling. Congress never codified abortion into the system and therefor it should have always been a States Rights issue for each state to decide. It was a correct sound decision unlike the previous SCOTUS decision. Congress is free to make an abortion law and a President sign it. At that point, it no longer is a States Rights issue and all states abide by it. Interesting nugget, not withstanding the fear mongering by the poster you replied to, Trump seems to want to support a 15week(ish) abortion ban with exceptions for life of mother, rape, incest. That is a longer time period than many of the EU countries that our posters want us to so desperately follow, yet someone is going around saying abortion will be criminalized in the early next term.
  20. Dumb(not you or Filidorkski). The Trump thing
  21. I never said that. What I said was that the planet warming has far surpassed worse case scenarios, predictions made by scientists years ago. No scientific projections predicted ocean temperatures where they are today - hence the meaning of passing even the worst scenarios because that's true. And what has this “worst case scenario” done to us? It’s so bad, no one could have predicted it, yet here we are all nice and tidy. Were we supposed to be heading to super boats with our tickets like in the movie 2012. Now here is where you are wrong again. I don’t deny climate change and never have. What you don’t seem to know is the Earths climate has changed for billions of years. You may also not understand that humans have not been on the planet for billions of years. Funny story but for a long long long long time the Earth didn’t even have glaciers. Then interestingly enough, the glaciers we do have we much much much larger than present day. Not sure how they melted so much when cars aren’t around though Maybe it was the Bear farts.
  22. LOL. I’m sure we will get some sort of rationalization why these dorks should continue to vote..
  23. How about this gem from article. Why didn’t these a$$h@!es tell me to stop using my gas stove 5 years ago so we didn’t hit defcon 10 on this scary place. And why are we holding in-person climate change meetings. Isn’t zoom a thing now! Or did these people plant a tree before their private jet flight and do the carbon neutral thingy? “Francis said on a 1-to-10 scale of how bad the situation is, she gives what’s happening now “a 10, but soon we’ll need a new scale because what’s a 10 today will be a five in the future unless society can stop the buildup of heat-trapping gases.”
×
×
  • Create New...