Archy1221

1) show me where the SC Justices lied in their hearings. 2) the next point moot because the first didn’t happen. Plus you are asking for unrealistic information,

Still waiting on the answer to the question posed to you on what was wrong.

And this is why no one takes you seriously and for good reason. The criteria he wanted was for someone to look into confirmation hearings from 50-200 years ago. Ain’t gonna happen. He can do the research if he wants to dispute someone. The cases have been posted, then he changed what he wanted. You chime in and say the same nonsense because you have sad trombone going on about the ruling and just want to argue for the sake of arguing.

Ya, I posted the cases earlier there knap. Not a good look for you here.

To a stupid question. Of course that should be the answer. He really thinks someone is gonna research SCOTUS confirmation hearings from 150 years ago I will leave that up to him. Along with figuring out and knowing what settled law and Precedent actually mean.

I think this is where the goalpost emoji gets inserted.

You may be surprised at what else was settled law and Precedent before getting overruled.

America: where a baby is allowed a chance at life.

LOL….no. We are in agreement FINALLY of my first statement about contraceptives not being banned by SCOTUS. Which you have been arguing about and now finally agree also.

The ones having a hissy fit about Precedent during the confirmation hearings.

Did I say it had already been banned? No I didn’t. That’s what I said too yet you are arguing about for some odd reason

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_overruled_United_States_Supreme_Court_decisions People act like SCOTUS has never overruled itself.

How so again, constitutional law professor.

How so

How exactly does what the Mayo Clinic says pertain to no States having it banned? Which is kinda what I said if you followed along from the beginning. If You don’t like the womens magazine I guess you can read these (or sports illustrated, whatever floats your boat). You will probably notice that it isn’t banned, which again, is what I said earlier. If these don’t work out for ya, just let me know what source you would like. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2022/06/24/plan-b-what-you-need-know/7567434001/ https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna35289 https://www.factcheck.org/2022/05/plan-b-pills-still-legal-in-tennessee-and-missouri-contrary-to-social-media-claims/

None of those states ban abortion for ectopic pregnancy. Florida is 15 weeks so doesn’t apply to what you said, Tennessee is 6 weeks, pretty restrictive timeframe but still gives time for what you claim to not be allowed, Ohio has a fetal heartbeat bill so not what you describe, Oklahoma has a rape/incest provision so not what you think. Arkansas Gov is going to call a special session on the rape/incest component.

Tell me you are clueless about today’s ruling without telling me you are clueless about today’s ruling.

You ok?!? One would assume that just because I consider the morning after pill a contraceptive based off an either or choice you gave, doesn’t mean a state or others consider it a contraceptive. BTW…..you do this a lot, as in get things wrong. Notice it’s not banned? https://www.womenshealthmag.com/health/a39945228/plan-b-ban/

I actually don’t think so.

We kinda survived before the Roe ruling (when we won the World War) and we will survive after this ruling.

Pretty well said.

I think you missed the part where I would disagree if they banned that morning after pill. Go have a beef with someone else about it.