Lorewarn

Not saying it's right, but that obviously won't happen. To some extent, speaking bad about an employer in a certain category of life is perceived as speaking bad about all of them, and Trev won't nuke his future potential success in college athletics or academia by burning that bridge.

Hopefully our local beat writers are up to the challenge.

Being programmed that way is a reflection of where we're at as a society.

Trev has never shown even an ounce of anything other than passionately wanting to be here and lead the AD into the future. Something must be absolutely unsalvageable to the core for him to actually leave considering how well he had it for himself and how well he had positioned all of our programs moving forward. Might be premature but right now I'd be absolutely shocked to see Rhule still here in 2026.

uhoh

With some things it is absolutely exactly like that. Somebody is making choices downstream to stifle and censor the bots responses to all sorts of prompts (had a lot of fun at a party asking chatgpt to tell me a joke about men, which it would, and then asking it to tell me a joke about women, which it would refuse to do).

Nobody's *actually* reporting it yet, but a handful of folks with ears in certain circles are starting to claim that he's staying put after the board made some of the 'right moves' to appease him.

And there it all goes. Anyways... If Trev orchestrated this whole thing as a necessary ultimatum after he's been quietly trying to press the issue for months only to find deaf ears and inaction, then that's all the more reason I think he's a great AD and want him here. Who knows, maybe this entire thing will have been revealed as an extremely coy and savvy whistleblowing move to get the regents to grow the hell up and figure it out.

In the last year we've lost Ted Carter, Ronnie Green, and now possibly/probably Trev Alberts. Now, it's not impossible for those things to not have a causal relationship with the dysfunction and lack of support from the state/regents/etc. But when you look at the not-so-secret reality that Ricketts and Pillen have been taking a blowtorch to the university, it's hard not to draw some pretty strong correlated conclusions.

This news is revealing rot at the bottom/top of the university that makes me really not even care who the new AD is because regardless of who it seems like a losing battle.

Guys did we just.... lose the offseason national championship? dynasty over :'(

Not sure I agree with that and I'm curious why you think so. The Spurs have to be the most boring championship franchise I can think of across any major sport in terms of entertainment. If anything I'd say their success in the 00s-10s would be despite the NBA having a vested interest in flashier, sexier storylines from bigger markets and/or more storied franchises.

I understand that is a narrative. I don't understand if you actually believe it or not (because despite it being something that people think is true, it isn't).

Just take the L my dude. That's due to you not paying attention; not due to a super radical lib clandestine open border agenda.

Which would mean Lebron was a greater one, no? Regardless, potential as a prospect and hype aren't the exact same thing.

I don't think Wemby's hype and expectations are even 1/10th of what Lebron had.

Hell, do ranked choice voting for a pool of XX number of candidates, and then do a random lottery. Tired of being denied thoughtful and effective servants and leaders because they aren't also total opportunistic kiss-a$$ charismatic celebrities.

Jesus what is wrong with his face

Respectfully, archy, bull fucking s#!t. Hide behind your benign technicalities all you want, but the fruit of a tree tells you its quality.

It's not really even that. I'm very very far from being a constitutional scholar but here's section 3 of amendment 14 and also section 3 of article 3 of the constitution: So yeah, the ruling makes it clear that Congress has the power to decide this. But also, there's the whole "unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act" part that doesn't seem to be acknowledged or explained at all.

re: the bolded, that's severely understating it: "Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States."

Not just leagues, but anything. If you think about it, we can't trust scientists either, because it's their job, not their hobby.

Go ahead and feel free not to watch if you can't handle the idea of possibly losing in a.... competition? lol

wah wah wah

What is "basketball"?