BIG8forever

they have been, it is been going for over 150 years and yeah the nation has been following college football religiously for 100 years, longer actually. The game represents the civil war, that is why it is so special to Americans.

come on bro, no need to go there, mike rozier, how many can even say that name and know he was the best nebraska back of all time

that is my point, we are in the low point that blue bloods must pull themselves out of or we are minnesota.

30 years- blue bloods do it for a century in college football minimum, Minnesota was just as dominant for a similar stretch, Yale was many times more dominant, legendary, etc... Nebraska has to be resurgent for us to actually be called a blue blood. We have to come back from this trough we are in and win a natty or we are definitely not a blue blood. Just sayin

How does thinking we are blue bloods help our program when the rest of the country doesnt think we are blue bloods

bro i am a cornhusker fan, just trying to get this toxic notion that we are blue bloods out of our heads or we are never going to have a decent team

what happens in 10 years when Nebraska still is having 5-7 seasons, 20 seasons...still a blue blood. I don't think it is realist as a fan to consider my program a blue blood when it just had a good 30 year run is all I am saying. it leads to unrealistic expectations. We play at the level of Minnesota, our program is alot like Minnesota. Minnesota in 1970 would have been considered a blue blood and Nebraska not. just sayin competing for national titles, i think that is how a blue blood would define themselves

michigan was national champs from 1901-1904 or something like that.

Blueblood, IDK, we were team that had a good 30 year run. Look at Michigan they have been relevant for a century and quarter, alabama...century, Notre Dame...century. I think you really have to go through the different iterations of football and still be relevant to be called a blue blood. I mean if we dont come back on line in 10 Years you will have to be 50 years old to remember when Nebraska was decent. that doesnt scream blue blood to me...personally.

hahahhahaha, cant believe you would think that...go huskers

basically the same mode of choosing a champ until the bcs. 1994 Penn State should share a title with Nebraska imo

those arent just ivy league natty's, those arent just ivy league HOF, and AAs lot more than Nebraska

you just going to leave out the 1960 natty?

Yale has 3 times AA, HOF and 19 national titles...are they a blue blood?

minnesota has ap national championships. They were dominant for the same amount of time.