So basically if it WAS an illegal hit, the conference will go back and do something about it. In that case, me and everyone who said it was a clean hit would be wrong. I'll eat that crow if it's served up.
I'm not holding my breath however.
EDIT: or maybe I'm reading it wrong and it won't be reviewed since there was no flag. They would review it in the NFL, I don't know about the BIG XII or NCAA. I'm willing to admit it if I read it wrong.
You are reading wrong...
1. He did not target a defenseless player
2. He did not use the crown of his helmet
3. He was not flagged- because it was a clean hit...........