Jump to content

Apathy

Members
  • Posts

    7,389
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

Posts posted by Apathy

  1. 5 minutes ago, Redux said:

     

    Why shouldn't they do both?  Why would you be against potential treatment, wish death?

    That’s what they do, if you don’t agree with their echo chamber they wish death on ya lol. 
     

    This guy in the video below should’ve used common sense when taking dog dewormer to treat his cancer….wait…it cured his cancer? Hmmm interesting

     

    Maybe we shouldn’t knock everything that doesn’t make sense, maybe we should investigate into it some more, do more research. Everything is so damn political nowadays it’s disgusting. There’s studies out there from both sides that it does & doesn’t work. What I do know about Ivermectin is that it’s a CHEAP drug that makes little money for big pharma

     

     

    • Plus1 3
    • Haha 1
  2. 7 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

    LOL.....not when you know the science behind the drug doesn't key on viruses.  

     

    Sometimes it's best to use some common sense.

    Tame down the insults there buddy

    • Plus1 3
    • Haha 1
    • Upvote 1
  3. 1 minute ago, BigRedBuster said:

    Oh.....you actually believe that Ivermectin, an anti-parasite drug, helps with a virus.

     

    Wow......

     

    :laughpound

    I don’t know but when other countries like Mexico, Brazil, India, etc are using it with overwhelming positive results, I guess you can’t overlook those results and shut the door on it.
     

    I guess I’m more open minded than others and I’m ok with that 

    • Plus1 4
  4. 1 hour ago, BigRedBuster said:

    The nice thing about when people would promote ivermectin for Covid, you knew instantly they were a blubbering idiot. 

    You talking about the same people who believe that ivermectin is a horse dewormer are the same ones who call doctors idiots for treating/promoting ivermectin for covid patients?

    • Plus1 2
    • Thanks 1
    • Oh Yeah! 1
  5. 6 hours ago, Lorewarn said:

     

     

    According to the first google result when I searched his name + twitter, I got this: 

     

     

     

     

    So for starters if we're gonna have a serious conversation about people being unrightfully banned, we should look at ALL that went into it and not just the final straw. 

    That’s the thing with twitter there was only one acceptable narrative, opinion, talking point, etc about Covid & vaccines and anything that doesn’t fit into that realm was deemed misinformation. 
     

    Hell people couldn’t even mention ivermectin without people losing their sh#t and their post were either removed or marked with covid misinformation.

    • Plus1 3
    • Oh Yeah! 1
  6. 9 hours ago, Lorewarn said:

     

    This isn't even remotely true. Like, not even in the same universe close. 

     

     

     

     

    You're right, it's not. They weren't banned, they were suspended for 12 hours starting after the removal of a tweet that went against their TOS. They're the ones that decided not to capitulate.

    A satire account posting a comedic tweet like they always do and Twitters safe place TOS suspended their account & banned them after they refused to delete it. I applaud the Babyalon Bee for not bending the knee.

    • Plus1 4
×
×
  • Create New...