Danny Bateman

Hmmm. Astute observation. I think perhaps Cav is eyeing the mini-bar.

The Farnioks have a lovely home.

Most everything about your post, and about Trump, is ludicrous and crazy. I don't like Clinton but she wouldn't do near as much damage as Trump would. It's crazy to think that a sexist, racist, flip flopping, pretend Christian, pretend Pro-Lifer, arrogant conceited a-hole who could have made more money if he'd just put his original $200 million in mutual funds is going to do anything at all to "change America for the better." I'd also add Trump likely has undiagnosed Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Here's the criteria from the American Psychiatric Association's diagnostic manual, the DSM-5. You make the call:

Lol. Isaiah seems to have his template for tweets down.

Sounds like that woman was just out to get you man. You're 100% right... It's just straight up biological development differences in body composition that leads to women developing bodies that cannot typically physically outperform a man. What makes me upset is when people use the guise of "being PC" to hide behind a nonsensical argument or try to defeat a legitimate one. That's exactly what that woman was doing. But not everyone does it. A good, judicious person would do it when it is actually legitimate. For example, Trump's comment about Kelly "bleeding out her... whatever" is not PC because it is openly sexist. It's overtly obvious what he meant, and any person that would say such a thing (and mean it) comes off as sexist and immature, rightfully so. Much less a politician that would do so. Essentially, I think there's a lot of gray area when you talk about "PC," gray area between legitimate criticism and openly being sexist, racist, homophobic, bigoted, etc. It bothers the hell out of me when people exploit that gray area to stifle others saying legitimate things about controversial subjects, but I have no problem with people rightfully crying foul if someone has crossed the line. Everyone's line is drawn in a different spot, which is another problem. Lastly, there's truth to the notion that some people dislike Obama simply because he's a black man. Unfortunate, but true. But that's JUST the racists. Other people like him for legitimate reasons, and that's fine. Painting with a broad brush is usually inaccurate.

TGH, that DeLay guy is crooked as hell. One glance at his Wikipedia page told me I could dismiss him as a source. He was involved with Abramoff big time and seems to have taken under the table stuff on other occasions as well. Given that he's so slimy and the only one saying that about the FBI, I could honestly see it as a lame attempt to try to slander the Hillary. Landlord, an argument against the Samders v. Pubs polling I heard recently is that it doesn't matter too much right now. National polls are predictive of very little at this point, and Sanders numbers don't take into account the attack ads the Pubs would draw up to try to hurt Bernie. I like his platform, but unfortunately he is susceptible to attack on a variety of things. Moiraine has a point on one of them- to a skeptic, Bernie can come off as a crotchety old man up there ranting. I thought I had heard at one point the $19 trillion number wasn't accurate. But I couldn't find anything to suggest otherwise. Anyone know? Landlord?

Trump would be a disaster as president on a variety of levels. BRI, you nailed my practical issue with him and his candidacy- from what I've seen (and it's been quite a bit), his failure to clearly articulate any type of legitimate, specific plan is a huge issue. He spends so much time trying to get headlines by gloating about his poll numbers or taking shots at his opponents that he never seems to say anything. He complains or brags, but doesn't explain anything. When he does try to get into issues, he speaks in broad sweeping statements (I.e., "We need to be strong on ________"). I can't vote for a guy who doesn't seem to have any actual plan. Unless he's purposely obscuring it to reveal specifics later, it ruins him from a practical sense for me. Beyond that, personally, I could never vote for someone I deem to be of such absolutely terrible character for president. Moiraine, it legitimately worries me if Trump were to win as well. Worst case scenario, he wins and appoints other political "outsiders" to fill his cabinet. Trump, surrounded by cronies for a cabinet, with a Republican congress, could set progressive movements and programs back noticeably or in some cases, shelve them completely. If Trump were to maintain his current demeanor, foreign relations would be a nightmare.

Good get for Narduzzi.

I'd be OK with this. Jackson to MSU/ Farniok N/ buddies to Iowa

Man, I hope MSU and Iowa staffs were in other rooms and each took a turn. If they were all in the same room-- Oy. Let's lock Matt up! Get this guy N!

This may work to our advantage. Hopefully this season bought Ferentz a ton more rope.

This is gonna be a guy we love to hate if he turns into anything at Iowa.

Harbaugh can kiss my grits.

He done talked to Quon.

This. He's also showing some sociopathic tendencies. That, of course, could just be staged for publicity, but regardless, Trump seems to legtimately have 1+ psychological disorders going on. He's drunk from his sense of power. Very much looking forward to him being destroyed verbally and tactfully-- coming soon, to a stage near you!

Gore/pomegranates, eh?

Let's not forget that all civil rights movements of any minority group that we now view as equal started off in the fledgling stages, as you see with transgendered people going through today. Just because it's always been that way previously isn't justification to cling to that same ignorant, uncompromising standpoint. What we're seeing now with the advent of the term "PC" is a dangerous faction of people who feel they're protected and can continue being hateful to others because "free speech." You're just telling it "like it is." No, you're clinging to antiquated notions of the way human beings behave and being an ass. In other news, I felt this was relevant. This derp is REAL, and is REALLY from our HS valedictorian. Zoogs, feel free to remove if this is somehow impermissible. I've redacted any identifiers: Sorry about the size.

He is such a transparent phony. He has shown he is absolutely going to pander to whoever will give him votes. I'd like to see someone (preferably a WASP) stand up and (lie) ask about what Trump is going to do for Muslims already in the country. Or African Americans-- regarding the police. Or legal Hispanics. He'd crumble. I watched him foxtrot around questions about legitimate foreign policy questions about the Middle East from Wolf Blitzer in an interview not two hours ago. It was under the guise of "being unpredictable," and he spent most all of his time deflecting or putting blame on past Presidents (Obama, Bush) for being weak or stupid. He doesn't have a clue. Not a damn clue.

Who?

And his followers applauding him when he said that just shows how dumb they really are. Trump followers are, for the most part, lemmings. I seriously doubt most of them research his claims, and if they did, they'd find he's full of it. Politifact gave him a 77% BS rating on his claims. It blows my mind people celebrate him for "saying what people are afraid to." Is THAT really the part of our personality we want to champion? ...while simultaneously keeping risk to our troops at a minimum. It amazes me that the same people that think our vets are so mistreated by and large support sending them over into various hellholes to be maimed or die. Also, today it hit the fan what a racist Trump's dad was. All over CNN. This ought to be interesting.

This will be my contribution to the celebraish. #highschoolsoundtrack