corncraze

Yeeeeeeeeeeesssssssssssss!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Exactly!!!!!

Does a&m leave for the sec to escape their little brother image under Texas, or do they take to this new big 12 money deal? Who knows if the state of Texas would even let them go if they wanted to, but if they did somehow leave for the sec, does Texas still stick with the b12?

I'd take notre dame, they have a top tier program and I absolutely hate em. Problem is that we don't no if theyll join the big10 especially with all all the super conference talk dying, and they'd need to improve their current level of play. IV said it once and I'll say it again, if we do get a top main rival, it should b Penn state, but we don't need a rival either so we shouldn't force a rivalry- especially with lesser prestige iowa

Lambeau would be awesome!!!!!!!

They wanted to start their own network and would not be a part of the big 12 network. I believe big 12 officials thought it would fail without the large market that Texas brings to the table. Not entirely sure what you are asking, if you mean for the big 12 to expand than it would require apporval from the presidents and chanclors not sure how much of a mojority though. If you mean for Texas to leave than their board of regents would have to aporve it but the required majority vaires with each schools rules. Don't think it why they want the pac 10 however that is why they wanted Colorado replaced with Baylor. I doubt it the pac 10 commish already stated that if Texas joins they will not be able to start their own network. This tells us that he will not put up with the crap that Texas likes to pull. 16 teams would require a 9 team majority to pass isues or possibly a 12 team "super majority" to pass major issues. If the pac 10 has rights to texas media, y don't they just join the b10 who already has a network? Don't have an answer for this one, except that it couldn't hurt. Hope that helps Haha yep u got everything. I didn't mean expansion for the question u were confused by, haha some how I got mixed up cause I meant a conference network, my bad

OK so IV been wondering a few things about Texas and maybe y'all can help me. Ok so the first thing i want to know is how texas shot down things like a conference network for the big12? Is there like some majority vote needed to pass something like a conference expansion? Is that y texas wants the pac10 along with the most of the b12 south to come-so they can hold enough of a minority to shoot things down in the pac10, like a network? If Texas joins the pac10 along with 4 other big 12south schools, would they have like a minority vote to be able to shoot down a pac10 network? If the pac 10 has rights to texas media, y don't they just join the b10 who already has a network? Do they just want pac10 because they can maintain rivals and get California recruiting? Thanx who ever has the answers

Agreed this is definitely the best possible rival. We can't have OSU as our top rival because the have Michigan, and vice versa Iowa hasn't really had any success aainst us, so it'd b kinda like the Colorado thing all over again, except Iowa doesn't even have one title Penn State has a history with us, a similar level prestige as us, and really no main top rival

If Crick stays and if we find another wr along side kinnie, no question

Dude I want Penn St every year! 82 & 94 ring a bell to anyone? JoePa would b awesome to face every year, not to mention a yearly series with pa. Would definitely help our recruiting game in the east coast, such as Pennsylvania, new Jersey, and the Virginias

Wisconsin's head coach just said he wants a trophy with us on his twitter page

Would like a minority vote be able to shoot down a pac10 network? How did texas vote it down in the b12? Do they want to bring the b12 south with so they can have enough of a minority vote to shoot down things like a network and stuff in the pac10? If the pac 10 has rights to texas media, y don't they just join the b10 who already has a network?

I've only ever been to one OSU game. When UCLA came to town back in the late 90s. I wasn't flaming. I was hoping that you caught the jist of my humor. Lol I did, I was just playing with you. The flaming coment was for my coment about the 97' game that was not. It's all in good fun. Well then, let's have some fun, shall we? 1. During 93-97 Husker football lost only 3 games. 2. During the sames time frame played for 4 National Championships and won 3 (one shared of course). 3. In 97, the year in question, we played a MUCH stronger opponent in Tenn. than you did in Wash. St. We freaking clobbered them and you barely won and in contreversial fashion. 4. Sure you won the Big Ten that year, but overall the Big 10 had a horrible Bowl record that year. They weren't the strongest conference that year. 5. Ok, WE GOT THE SEARS TROPHY!!! You can have that wooden piece of crap AP one. 6. Considering Nebraska's crazy dominance during that time frame a VERY strong argument can be made that the only reason you got to share the title is because you couldn't play us. The only reason our schedule was easier was because we had two Big12 teams on it Ok, that was funny!!! So excited about all of this, I live in Mi. and now I can actually see the Huskers in person when they visit here. Don't forget we trashed peyton manning and y'all could barelu up hold against the major draft bust ryan leaf. Remember now, manning was drafted for his already developed talent and leaf was for his so called potential and not because of his at the time level of play. Also our d was ridiculous that year and we were playing for osborne as it was his last game, I don't thinl anyone coulda derailed that teams motivation on that day.

What about the Bo-down??? Pelini and Schembechler haha get it? The 97 Bo-down!

Or Iowa state. Hahahahahaha serves em right! Also don't forget the big10 may pick up ku as a balancing act instead of Missouri, mostly because of their basketball team, and don't forget they have the kc market

I guess it depends on who you ask. I am not sure that my loyalties will follow the huskers to the big ten. If the Big 12 would go get Notre Dame, my loyalties would stay with the big 12 instead of staying with Nebraska. This is a sad day for many Husker and Big 12 fans! I feel the same way toward Ohio State as I do towards Mizzou..... no other teams that I would like to see lose every game. However, I am so angry over this move by the Huskers that I would laugh if Nebraska loses every game. I guess "Go Big Red" means "Run Big Red".... If you can't win the big 12, change conferences. No pride left what-so-ever in Lincoln. Don't kid yourself... Nebraska is and will continue to lose some fans over this move. It is a chicken-_ _ _ _ move, and that shows loyalty can be purchased. So we should just say goodbye to history? No more Oklahoma / Nebraska games, but I'm sure Nebraska / Illinois will be a show-stopper. What happens now to Nebraska if we cannot win the big 10? Do we go the WAC then? If Nebraska wants more money, they need to start winning more games. I have lost alot of respect for Nebraska and Tom Osborne over this. I know alot of Big Ten fans, and I can tell you right now that there isn't more solidarity in the big ten than in the big 12. You won't find a Michigan fan rooting for Iowa or Michigan State to win a non-conference game, not like you would see a Texas or Oklahoma fan rooting for Nebraska. I can guarantee you that! Is the big ten finally going to start having a championship game? The only reason, and I mean the ONLY reason that big ten fans are welcoming this move, is because they have always thought the big ten to be a much tougher conference than the big twelve, and they all think they are going to march into Lincoln and pound on Nebraska. I can tell you right now, that this move would not have been so welcomed back in Nebraska's glory days! Just think about it. Heresy!!!!!!!!!!!! Your Husker fanship is now in question and could possibly b revoked. Ur meeting will take place with Dr. Tom on Tuesday to discuss ur future with this organization... just be happy ur meeting isn't with Bo.

Cause u can replace em... Boise, tcu, byu, Utah, Houston...

Hahahahaha I was joking about this just yesterday!

So if the big east collapses there's a good chance the b10 adds nd and then mizzou to balance the b10. Question is there is so much uncertainty about everything, so I ask Husker fans Does Missouri get left behind? If they do maybe we can get some of their recruits haha

I can't wait for this game! So much shared history between our programs, itll b nice to continue it

2 reasons- $$$$$$$$$$$$$$ & To avoid another Texas monopoly

Oh okay so the last 10 years matters, just not the last 13? The masses remember the past decade but "if any of that matters" from 97 now "we're kidding ourselves." What a joke. And I also don't recall Iowa winning a Heisman or playing for a championship this decade. Your national title game was 13 years ago. Your incomming freshman were 5 years old when that game was played. They don't remember one damn snap. The joke is that Nebby will come in with thier 4 national titles and 4th winningest team in college football history and dominate because they have 4 national titles and are the 4th winningest team in college football. Ask scUM what tradition alone gets you in the B10 (I'll give you a hint, it's 1 and 7 in the conference). Congratulations on your storied past. That along with your academic standing and your other athletic prowess helped you get the invite. But now that you are here get in line. Your history in college football means something between Jack and sh#t and Jack left town. That being said were damn happy to have you. PS I really don't think you want to get in the argument of who matters more in the last decade. No titles and no Heisman's but in the last 10 years we have finished in the top 10 four times, had an AP player of the year, a Doak Walker award winner, a Mackey award winner, an Outland Trophy winner, one Heisman runner up, and one 6th place finish. Ignorant to the past perhaps because yours is unmatching? Look u can't force a rivalry... especially if its unbalanced, and that's in every category. Please tell me y u think one of the most prestigious programs in the nation with 5 ncs and 3 Heismans should settle for a program with no titles, on Heisman for the 30s er something, and who have relatively had no success against us? Do u not remember what happened in our last game, 42-13 right? U must remember our last main rival was 7 NC, 5 Heisman ou right? Sorry but for Nebraska fans the word rivalry has huge implacations.

I am a little worried about the bolded part....that is kind of creepy sounding. Hey kids, want a lollipop. Look at my gold pants charm. Isn't it nice? What on earth is a gold pants charm? They mean like MC hammer?

So listing to Espn radio and there doing a "is it just me...?" Special and one fan wrote " is it just me or is the loss of the nu v cu "rivalry" the biggest loss for the big 12?" Haha I laughed so hard! The host then went on to say he couldn't even remember a Husker v cu game, but then again he also said that he remembered the Matt Davidson catch of 97 in which he proclaimed was against cu although any college football fan would know that was against Missouri. Still I laughed so hard

Sadly I agree, but we could do it on occasion