bugeater17

Dude looks 30.

Never mind - gbr

Just skimming the report, the prosecution will have issues authenticating the video. It will be interesting to see who they put on their witness list. Mom states she’s never seen and can’t see her daughters face but “knows” it’s her daughter. Thats not based on personal knowledge and inadmissible. The prosecution will need to list someone who has seen the video or one the boys involved to authenticate it otherwise there’s not evidence it’s a minor. Mother also solicited distribution of child porn and appears to be driving the bus behind prosecuting it. There are multiple inconsistencies in the police statement that would make it an ugly trial for v1 and the mom. Based on what I’ve gathered as well is Mo’s attorneys have been granted continuances due to prosecution not making timely disclosures. This will continue to get dragged out and decent chance judge throws it out. However, I think a judge at preliminary hearing will allow to go to trial and at that point a plea will be reached before trial.

The thought of having Manning on the field with JD, Wan 'dale, and Mo Wash at the same time is enthralling.

Thanks for the insight!

I'm guessing Frosty has clipped out that headline (and last two sentences) and put up on the 'ole bulletin board.

Should not be charged until his court hearings are over? How exactly would that work?

Got to think Lee will be the starting S this week, if not for a possible injury to Williams but due to his play and the game being in Colorado (his home state).

Mo is not being accused of a sexual assault. Also, Mo was not involved in the video which he had in his possession. So if this issue with Hunt and Legrone is a sexual assault situation, which no one knows yet, then the 2 situations are completely different and should be dealt with differently.

Good points Mav. Hopefully Tannor starting over Ferg is an indication in Tannor's growth and improvement over Ferg - instead of a indication of a not fully health Ferg at the moment.

I get the feeling he is interested but we are more of a back-up plan if something falls through at 'Bama, for instance if he is recruited over.

Very good points! D will have some depth concerns up front but hopefully the O will be even more experienced and high powered in 2020.

No - it actually doesn't. Perhaps you should sit down and have an honest conversation with kids 13-17 years old. I think you'd be shocked to find out what exists on their phones. Not saying its right but it certainly doesn't fit what I think most legislatures are trying to do by making child porn a felony.

First it was a hypothetical. Second, the child porn charge, which is the felony, is a trumped up charge. Its being used for plea bargaining purposes. The purpose and intent behind the statute is to protect children from being taken advantage of in a multitude of ways - not to prosecute high school students for having dirty pics/vids of ex-gfs/bfs.

So if the DA drags this out all season and then drops the charges in January 2020, you see no issue in sitting a kid who was wrongfully charged on trumped up charges?