bugeater17

Yeah the ump seems to be pretty liberal with breaking balls and outside/opposite of where he sets up.

Yes he is!

Odd choice to go with Frazier in this situation. Would think he was going to be the starter in game 2 today if needed...

It will be tough to ever crack the top 3 with the SEC, Big 12, ACC, and Pac 12 - but moving into the top 5 and occasionally moving ahead of one of the other Power 5 is a more realistic goal.

Redux- I'm of similar thought. The only team in the West that I'm not confident we will beat is Iowa. I think the West will be decided on 11/29 in Lincoln.

My starting 5 as of now (with no Roby and Stevenson out until January) G-Mack G-Green G-Burke F-Kavas F- Ouedrago 1st off the bench will be Cheatam. I think Stevenson has the chance to start over Kavas come BIG play. Also think Curtis and Cross will see lots of minutes. Cross mainly out of lack of depth.

As a caveat, I'm not 100% familiar with California criminal procedure, but this case is not starting over. There would have been a plea hearing set at some time point whether or not he maintained the same attorney. The timeline on this is/has been pretty standard. If a plea deal is not reached at the plea hearing and he pleads not guilty he should get a trial date at that point (in which other deadlines in the case will be based).

Convinced to stay on as DC or not run out of town?

As an FYI, a plea hearing does not mean a deal has been reached or immanent. It's merely a hearing prior to trial at which the Defendant responds to the charge(s) by entering a plea of guilty, not guilty, or no contest. However, the parties could enter a plea agreement and announce at the plea hearing as well. As of right now, we don't know much if anything about the status of Mo''s case.

I see the running back room as having the same trajectory as the QB room - but being just 1 year behind. Last year there were a lot of question marks with depth in the QB room, now the QB room depth looks solid. This upcoming year there are a lot of depth question marks with the RB room. The following year (2020) I foresee the RB depth being solid.

Completely agree - I think the only way he comes back is if he gets feedback (and actually considers the feedback) that he needs to improve his shot/3s and he realizes that is what Hoiberg is known for; however, I too think he is gone.

This is complete speculation on my part, but I think Hoiberg either has a big lined up for next year or feels really good about a transfer or juco- otherwise I don’t think he would have had the “conversation” he did with Heiman (I get he’s not a fit but that’s a different convo).

Transparency is the reason we will get from the NCAA - ie) to make sure college coaches and training staffs are properly treating players and not rushing them back into action. It will allow more NCAA oversight into players injuries and recovery time parameters. Also, the big winners are local journalist as it provides another topic to discuss and publish (not to say injuries aren't already discussed but if there was a day the reports were to be submitted it provides another topic to publish and analyze).

Completely agree for the most part. I've tempered my expectations for this season pending the health/availability of our skill position players. However, if Spielman and Robinson are healthy and Mo and Mills are available/on the team I think we can get to 10 wins this season.

Need a sweep to get things back on track.