Moiraine

Yep, and men who ejaculate anywhere other than inside a vagina should be arrested for abortion.

Tuberville's a f#&%ing moron but he could also be corrupt.

But maybe instead of the moon causing ocean waves, the ocean waves are sucking the moon towards the earth, and because all the glaciers are melting the waves are becoming better at moon-sucking, and this causes an influx of eclipses.

It’s an accusation that shouldn’t be made in real time unless you are a lot more sure than any of the people referring to it as a genocide are. Gaza’s governed by terrorists who raped/killed/kidnapped a bunch of civilians at a concert. Retaliating by trying to kill the terrorists isn’t genocide. I’m sure Israel could do a much more successful genocide if they wanted to. There’s a reason their existence is constantly threatened yet they’re still there.

Now you need to find the 2 Lost actors who are in Shogun

I’ve been annoyed by both sides of the discussion of her greatness, but mostly by the side that blows smoke up her a$$. I was watching a men’s BB game, I think in the Elite 8. So one of the best men’s teams in the country. A guy makes a long 3. Announcer says (paraphrasing) he’s looking like Steph Curry out there. Another announcer says “or Caitlin Clark.” And it made me want to barf. You can talk about her being good without being so moronic it becomes a joke. And it’s not that the guy was saying she could do well in the NBA. It’s obnoxious because she hasn’t played a single second against the equivalent female competition. If she had been in the WNBA 10 years and put up Curry like numbers, the comment wouldn’t bother me. Anyhow, there is no way she joins the 3 on 3 league. She doesn’t seem to do well (or I should say as well) against physical, athletic female defenders. She won’t be able to shoot over or get open against men who are 6-18” taller than her typical defenders. Not to mention she’d be a huge liability on defense unless the team composition required 1 female per team.

My favorite play was at 8:36 here:

We do what we want

I believe having a living breathing “monarchy” that ties back to old people probably helps increase the tourism revenue somewhat. Because as others have said, some people are obsessed. It’s kind of hard to judge the amount though. It’s not like people would stop visiting Buckingham Palace or Westminster Cathedral if there were no longer royals. In fact at the beginning of their absence, Buckingham would open up all of the other wings so you could see what their living quarters were like, and would be open 12 mos a year instead of just in the summer. The private estates would all turn into museums as well if not owned by the family. Most of the “public” places only have sections available to see. So there would probably be a boom in visitors and revenue for at least the first 5 years, if the royals went away. In case anyone was wondering: So I assume a change in the law could instantly take Buckingham and Windsor from Charles. Balmoral is in the middle of nowhere so who cares. Dunno where Sand is.

I feel like 75% of the people who hated it think that nothing on the island ever happened, even though it flat out says in the last episode that it all happened. I think the other 25% just don't like the Christiany ending.

Who do we need to banish to get rid of those awful eclipses?

They are both in the wrong. Maybe Israel can decide 30,000 killed is enough to make up for the 1,000 killed and raped. But I think they just want to take over the entire region and govern it, but only as occupiers, because they don't want those people to vote.

Is it okay to watch porn involving bunny ears and a bunny tail butt plug on Easter as long as there are no trans people in it?

Why do you post Tweets without looking any of it up and/or sharing what you found? It took me about 2 minutes to find the first thing is just made up bulls#!t. You can see in the graph the household # is higher. (And it’s supposed to be higher because it includes farm related jobs, while the other doesn’t). https://www.bls.gov/web/empsit/ces_cps_trends.htm

Yup.

They did the English audience a favor by switching all of the Portuguese to English. When the characters are talking English it's actually meant to be Portuguese. So you only have to read the Japanese.

So humans can survive in -300 degress F for 30 years now? I guess I bought the wrong type of long johns.

I just find it hard to believe the idiots who would be mad about something like this are swayable. Chances are the message was automated, since this is the 4th year they've done it. It's potentially an oversight to let it go again this time given it's on a religious holiday this year, but if they had not made the proclamation after doing it the previous 3 years in a row, there is another group of idiots who would have been upset and asked why it wasn't mentioned (e.g.: is Biden ashamed now that it's an election year!?), and this group of idiots are more likely to be potential Biden voters.

They started doing the proclamations in 2021. This year it just happens to be on Easter. Kinda funny it was in 2024 though. The next time Easter is on the 31st is 2086.

I think they should have vetoed it again due to China/Russia blocking the ceasefire's reliance on releasing the hostages. Also, the Hamas requests are unreasonable. "“Israel has not agreed to any of (Hamas) requests related to a complete ceasefire, the withdrawal of all forces from the Gaza Strip, even in stages, and the return of all displaced people to their homes,” Naeim said."

If the bridge collapse was a universal awful day, then every day is an awful day.

What was awful yesterday?

I've posted about it before but just looked it up again. My farming cousins complain about welfare and freeloaders on FB sometimes. The data on subsidies is available online. One of them has received $360K since 1995 and $60K since 2019. The other has received $270K and $25K.

Was the ship too tall or did it hit a pylon? Edit: just watched the video. Edit2: Ok I decided to Google instead of ask Huskerboard.