SFW

Now who’s AMart going to stare down and throw high over the middle to? Wan’Dale lots of hospital passes coming your way!

Does anyone out there know what the percentage of blitzes with 6 or more rushing we ran last year?

The video is the style of D I want. I don’t care what it’s called...although, I believe the Ravens, as do most NFL teams run a 4 man front. Putting all the bodies on the line Of scrimmage makes life miserable for QBs.

Talk from Chinander is cheep. We rarely blitz. We never put 7,8,9 players the line and make the QB make an instant decision on whose coming and whose dropping. With big risks come big rewards. Chinander’s 3-4 is too conservative, what is he afraid of?

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/film-room/2019/film-room-ravens-defense This style of defense I want. QBs can’t figure out whose coming and whose dropping. Good DCs know QBs with time will kill you. Yes I know we’re not the ravens but put all that undersized speed to work. 8 guys in Zone coverage is a QBs wet dream.

Twisting my words...nice. You should work for CNN. Maybe your comprehension is poor.

When the game was on the line multiple times last year we only brought 3 guys sometime we rushed an undersized hybrid linebacker. Usually easy to figure out where it was coming from. In my opinion a blitz should be bringing 6-7 guys, when teams go empty back field. I’d like D 7-8, and yes 9 D-players on the line. Make the quarterback try to figure out, in a split second whose coming and who is dropping. So, with our lack of talent, I’d like to see 4 of those players being bigger bodies. On obvious run situations I definitely want at least 4 bigger bodies on the line. Since joining the big ten speed hasn’t been the issue, it’s been size. We simply get pushed around against the run and against the pass QBs have all day to throw. Putting more safety-hybrid -linebackers isn’t the answer. If it were OSU, PSU, MINN, MSU, MICH, NW would be doing it. I guess Chinander’s just smarter than them.

I believe the issue is what the article at the beginning of the thread and Chinander’s trying to figure out....rush ends. In a 4 -3 you have two rush end specialist on the field every play and one more bigger body on the line. Which is of paramount importance in the B10....more bigger athletic bodies. Chinander’s trying to address this with one smaller athletic body. Which he usually has them running down field away from the quarterback to cover a back or tightened. So right back to the problem of 3 on 5 and QBs with all day to throw. The SEC is full of NFL talent and top notch DCs. I think Chinander’s D would be better in the B12. It’s the wrong fit for the B10 football. When Nebraska had great Defenses in the past we always has 2 talented D ends. We will never be able to recruit those types again in a 3-4. The most talented B10 team OSU runs a 4-3 and is consistently recruiting and getting D ends to the NFL. You know like we used to.

Every top Big Ten rushing defense with the exception of Wisconsin runs a 4-3. Chinanders 3-4 is not going get it done in the B10.

Purdue by a mile. A loss in this game, will break our season. If we can’t beat Purdue we won’t have more than 4 or 5 wins. A win and we have hope.

Luke is faster, a better arm, and better athlete than AM. He represents a true dual threat that opponents will not enjoy playing against. If Luke starts and stays healthy we will have a winning season. if it’s AM we will see more of the same and another losing season.

That’s the spirit!

Go BiG Screen Game!!!

Bob Diaco, will make the Huskers feel the strain again with a win for Purdue in the opener.

He does more with less than Venerable...so yes he’s the best. who’s your choice?