Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

71 Excellent

About flatwaterfan

  • Rank
    Scout Team

Profile Information

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

8,766 profile views
  1. In my opinion the target number for D-line is 11. This is how I arrive at that target. You have 85 scholarships. Lets say you budget 3 for special teams. (Now that is a soft number and it could be anywhere from 0-3 but for a high level planninng view assume you never have more than 3 but potentially you could have a scholarship LS,K,P so you plan worst case scenario) So basically year to year you have 82 overall. Divide that in half for offense and defense and basically you can figure you have 41 scholarships to allocate for defense. Now if you had 4 scholarships at every position that would be 44 which is 3 over. To scale back to 41 just take 1 guy off at each level as there are 3 levels on defense. so if you are in a 3-4 defense than (3*4)-1 = 11. DB's and LB's are (4*4)-1 = 15. (IMO target numbers are tough to hit as rosters are pretty dynamic and sometimes you just might not have the talent or experience so you might load up on a position or you have unexpected attrition and the number of recruits that may or may not commit are unknown. So really they are probably working with ranges. So you could say that they want to be in the range of 10-12. But for this discussion I am saying 11 is optimal. If you go 12 than you have to be 1 short somewhere else. Okay if you were to break down the 11 DL I would say that you would want 7 DE's and 4 NG's. I think it's important to have 4 NG types because you may play an additional nose in goal-line defenses. Just going by body type or ability I would say that Daniels and Hutmacker are every down noses. I would say that Stille, Thomas,Rogers,Walker,Newsome, Wildeman and Robinson are more DE types. Green has been penciled as a DE. I think he could be a nose though if needed and will count him as a DE/NG. This means we need at least 1 more nose. Personally I feel pretty good about the numbers and talent at DL. We are pretty close. I agree with the concern at OLB. We have not done so well there.
  2. It use to be they wouldn't even provide stats but somehow they would always leak. Now I believe they are allowed to release some notes about the scrimmage. They need to get rid of the secret label and just call it a 'closed' scrimmage which is more accurate.
  3. You should be able to go to https://tv.youtube.com/welcome/ to see the channel lineup for your area. They may still be doing the free 2 week trial. If not I think they run a free 1 week promotion most of the time for you to test out. I am happy with youtubetv so far. I did add my local PBS channel (NET) to my Roku channels to watch BigRedWrapUp but it didn't record and I couldn't select or add the show to my watchlist. I could add it as a favorite but it didn't record. Not sure what I am doing wrong. I can see and watch last years shows. Not sure what I am missing. It is not a problem with youtubetv it is something that I do not know. I am an old dummy and get off my lawn.
  4. I think the rule to limit fall camp to 110 players is stupid.
  5. Travel limit is 74 players for Big ten games. Your allowed more in non-conference games. ttps://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2018/08/27/big-ten-expands-football-travel-roster-limit-to-74-players/ I think the travel roster is not quite as static as it was in the past because of the increased number of players you can bring. This means they might switch up a player or two to reward a senior who hasn't traveled or get a true freshmen a taste of the road games or possibly if you are hit with an injury or two you now have a little more room to make adjustments. I use to watch the depth chart like a hawk but it has lost some of its importance for me personally ever since they skinnied it down to just a 2 deep. I find the travel roster to be a bit more impactful. I miss the old days. Now get off my lawn.
  6. Sho - Before you pay anything make sure you tell them you are self-pay. Often you can get a discount between 25% - 35%. This is the amount that they usually overcharge for people with insurance because they know insurance will try to negotiate that first number down whatever it may be. It's screwed up for sure. Also, if it's a really big bill and all from one provider sometimes you can get a discount like 10% if you pay the whole bill off all at one time. You have to ask them if they do that though.
  7. Actually I find it to be kind of insulting. I am going back on my long term hiatus not going to waste any more time with this crap. Seely https://12thman.com/coaches.aspx?rc=1059&path=baseball Bolt https://12thman.com/coaches.aspx?rc=897&path=baseball
  8. I will go with what the A&M bio's say and besides I like Harvell as the hitting coach. Not sure why anyone would get depressed. Time will tell.
  9. I know the article says Bolt was the hitting coach but I don't think it's accurate. The A&M coaching bios from 2018 indicated that "Bolt’s primary functions include coordinating the offensive game, mentoring the infielders and serving as third base coach." It doesn't say anything about hitting. Seely was the hitting coach. The bio states "He serves as the recruiting coordinator and works with the outfielders and hitters." Bolt was in charge of the offense so he does bear responsibility. Just wanted to point out that it's a group effort. History shows that he can put pretty good offenses on the field. Below is his old Nebraska bio. http://www.huskers.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=100&ATCLID=90230 Personally I think it gets back to RECRUITING.
  10. I have been doing some online research about catchers&pitching coaches and saw a few interesting tidbits. I don't think this is necessarily uncommon. Most pitching coaches were pitchers but some were catchers. Prior to the 1960's most pitching coaches were former catchers. The reasoning was that early MLB baseball had smaller coaching staffs and sometimes didn't even have a pitching coach. The smaller staff would compare to a college baseball staff. In general most MLB pitching coaches today were former pitchers however I think there a few that were catchers but I am not sure. I found a list of top 50 MLB pitching coaches and 6 of them were former catchers including the number 1 rated all-time pitching coach Dave Duncan. Most of them were 60's or prior. Duncan would be more recent.
  11. I bet you are right Hskrfan4life about the Northwestern coach's salary being unavailable. That makes sense. It certainly will be interesting to see how this turns out. I do not think there will be a big culture change so that's not something they have to overcome. Erstad and Bolt both promote a gritty & hardnose approach to the game. Batting approach will probably change. I think the biggest change will be in the recruiting from reading articles. Harvell will open up some southern ties and sounds like they will recruit the Kansas Jucos and Nebraska. Probably a little less in the Big ten states that don't border Nebraska with the exception of Wisconsin maybe. Just a guess. Sounds like Harvell recruited speed at SHS. Maybe we will see more of that? (Of course I thought we would see that under Erstad and we didn't. Maybe that ended up being dictated by the areas recruited.) Our lineup for next year is going to be experienced and tough I think. We could probably use another top SS but the positions are fairly well stocked IMO. Weekend pitching will be another story since we have to replace the 3 guys. I think they need to get a few more pitching recruits. I think Palket, Perry, Stroh, Curry and Luensmann will be in the mix for weekends. If we can get 3 inning eaters out of that group that would be great. Would like to see Schwellenbach do some spot relief like Gomes but we would need another SS for that.
  12. Back when Christy played for Nebraska the coaching staff let him call his own games. He also handled a couple of A&M games when Childress wasn't there and did well. I think he will do fine as far as pitch calls and staff management. The part that is harder to guess about for me would be pitching mechanics & development. I do not know much about baseball but maybe coaching pitching is more about how to recognize when mechanics are off and correcting those flaws and not as much about developing pitches? So maybe it takes a good eye vs practical experience in throwing pitches? Maybe there is someone on the board that can speak to this as I am guessing. Time will tell on that. Catchers generally make good coaches. I think folks agree on that. It should be noted that Bolt, Christy and Silva were all on staff together at Nebraska so Bolt is familiar with what Silva brings to the table. As far as letting Silva go, part of the decision could have to do with chemistry or perhaps it has to do with recruiting. Guessing again. Bolt is reportedly bringing in Harvell a top notch recruiter with Southern ties and he will probably be the recruiting coordinator. Maybe that was something Silva didn't want to give up? Just spit balling here. Maybe he wanted a local guy to recruit locally and a national guy? The Huskers.com interview seems to indicate it's all about chemistry and recruiting. Also I saw somewhere that people thought 300K was low. I am not sure if it was on this board. I do not think that it is low. I saw an article dated 2017 that baseball head coaches in the B1G made an average of $245K (or something close to that) The author said he couldn't find 2 Head coach salaries (Erstad and one other) but this is a decent guideline. So $300K for a first time Head Coach in the Big ten two years later sounds about right to me.
  13. I don't go to the politics board as the only piece of advice my Dad gave me was not to argue religion or politics. I don't want to argue with you and I don't want to take the time to post the article that I was regurgitating. I will say thank you for the previous post on May 10 about streaming and I understand your angst with some of these large corporations. I am a cord cutter because of DirectTV and their unethical behavior (in my opinion)
  14. Actually 'net neutrality' is enforced today but it is done in retro-active way. When the net came about they classified it as a type 1 service (data service). As such it falls under the umbrella of the FTC (federal Trade Commission) The federal trade commission is not a regulatory agency. Their mandate is light regulations, consumer protection, open platform with fair business practices. This encourages an open platform and growth. Problem is they are a watchdog organization with reactive enforcement which means they cant do anything until there is a victim/abuse of fair practice. When the FTC started seeing what you are describing on a reoccurring basis, they put out a set of guidelines that became the net neutrality rules. They then tried to enforce those proactively and got sued for it. Courts said your mandate is light regulations you can only enforce 1 of the rules. SO that's what they did. Basically back to doing business the old way. Obama administration didn't like that and got the internet reclassified as a type 2 service which is telecommunications. This falls under the FCC (federal communications commission). This is a heavily regulated platform. FCC is a regulatory body that is more proactive. They can proactively enforce the net rules. The problem with this is the cost of doing business goes up because of all the regulations that exist. Internet businesses became heavily regulated as they inherited other regulations besides the net rules. Growth declined because it was harder to do business in this type of environment. I know my rates went up. The other thing that started was a lobbyist industry for the internet as that's what happens in a gov't regulated industry. Then along came Trump who is pro business. The administration appointed a new board and they reversed the classification back to a type 1 service and business went back to the way it was for 20+ years. Things are moving again. Either way you do it there are pros and cons. The best solution is to make it it's own classification and an new oversight agency. Problem is they are fighting over the details as there is a lot of money/control/power involved.
  15. I do not know. This is where I got the 40 time. http://draftanalyst.com/kanawai-noa If I had to guess I would say no.
  • Create New...