NebraskaHarry
All-Conference
If you had told me before the game that Nebraska scores 87 against Illinois I would have said Nebraska wins.
I think the imbalance in how the game was called on both ends (not saying we didn't foul, but 9-3 foul differential with 12 minutes to go) affected how the defense played as they couldn't breath on Shannon driving without a foul being called. Then when one of our guys would drive and get similar contact, nothing.Eh ... everyone always likes to blame the refs.
We gave up 58 points. We played exactly zero defense.
I think the imbalance in how the game was called on both ends (not saying we didn't foul, but 9-3 foul differential with 12 minutes to go) affected how the defense played as they couldn't breath on Shannon driving without a foul being called. Then when one of our guys would drive and get similar contact, nothing.
But, we also have to make shots and get the ball in the basket.
In the league "NBA" (and the greats in college basketball), when the best coaches sense a momentum change is happening, they will kill the flow of the game immediately and call time outs. Because it disrupts the momentum and it slows the game down to a halt. They do it instantly, several times before it gets too late. Interupt a team's rhythm minute by minute and inbetween foul shots if need be. Greg Popovich, Pat Riley, Steve Kerr, Mike Krzyzewski, Bobby Knight, etc...1st Half
Nebraska 58% FG 38% 3FG
Illinois 35% FG 29% 3FG
2nd Half
Nebraska 36% FG 18% 3FG
Illinois 59% FG 55% 3FG
Did Nebraska play poorly in the second half? Yes, but without Shannon Illinois isn't in position to put up 58.Eh ... everyone always likes to blame the refs.
We gave up 58 points. We played exactly zero defense.
Yes, without the best player on the court playing...Illinois would have scored less.Did Nebraska play poorly in the second half? Yes, but without Shannon Illinois isn't in position to put up 58.
And had they called those two he wouldn't have been playing. Just those two obvious ones. I know they missed dozens of fouls both ways because B1G officiating is nothing if not inconsistent.Yes, without the best player on the court playing...Illinois would have scored less.
Wait, a judge said he has the right to play but that is not good enough for you?And had they called those two he wouldn't have been playing. Just those two obvious ones. I know they missed dozens of fouls both ways because B1G officiating is nothing if not inconsistent.
Hell, if Illinois had any guts he wouldn't even be on the team. I know if I was a woman on their campus, I would be filing Title Nine complaints about them allowing an indited rapist on campus. I know that his lawyers went to court to get him reinstated, but the school caved immediately because they didn't really want to suspend him but did so because of media pressure. The university & especially the athletic department got exactly what they wanted. They appeared to be "tough", but had no choice when a judge ruled that his rights had been violated, they didn't appeal.
They say every foul is worth 12 points. Seriously. Well somebody said that once. Okay, it was me, I just said it.Fouls were 19-18
f#&%ing cheating refs!