Jump to content


Poll: Do you like the Big Ten Logos and Division Names?


tschu

Big Ten  

187 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

I accidentally hit Yes on the poll, but please count me a no. Logo is all kinds of wrong. Font looks straight out of a bad Western movie poster. The blue is bad too. I get that they were trying to be iconic by keeping it ultra-simple with no borders/shading/etc., it just didn't work.

 

On the divisions, see Sparker above. Leaders???

 

Icons?

 

Legends & Icons?

Link to comment


Lakes & Plains would've sufficed.

 

However if you wanted to use spatial names, the best they could've done is:

 

Northwest Division = Consisting of the Legends Division

Southeast Division = Consisting of the Leaders Division

 

If you look at the map below, it works with the exception of Wisconsin.

 

 

67860546.jpg

Link to comment

Lakes & Plains would've sufficed.

 

However if you wanted to use spatial names, the best they could've done is:

 

Northwest Division = Consisting of the Legends Division

Southeast Division = Consisting of the Leaders Division

 

If you look at the map below, it works with the exception of Wisconsin.

 

 

67860546.jpg

That looks like a Risk board.

Link to comment

Lakes & Plains would've sufficed.

 

However if you wanted to use spatial names, the best they could've done is:

 

Northwest Division = Consisting of the Legends Division

Southeast Division = Consisting of the Leaders Division

 

If you look at the map below, it works with the exception of Wisconsin.

 

 

67860546.jpg

 

Actually looking at that, North and South would have just been fine, the only exception would be Wisconsin being in the South but location in the North.

 

I don't mind the logo, i think it will set in once i start seeing it painted on the field and courts around UNL.

 

As for the name, well looking at other conferences, we just have to be the lone standing out. Everyone else has directional differences in there division names, except us. Go Leaders and Legends of the B1G TEN conference.

Link to comment

Regarding division names . . .

 

"Legends" actually isn't too bad. "Leaders" is complete dogsh*t. Assuming you can't find something better to pair with "Legends," I think "Honor" and "Glory" would have been better choices.

 

Regarding logos . . .

 

I hate the logo more than the "Leaders" name, if that's possible. If you are not going to change the name to be numerically correct or otherwise incorporate a "12" into the name, why not just keep the same logo you have now? The whole "paying homage to the original ten founding members by having the "I" and "G" in "BIG" look like a "1" and "0," respectively, is retarded. Isn't calling the g'damn conference the "Big Ten" enough of an homage? Doing both is so redundant it makes me want to vomit.

 

Seriously, WTF (that's "Who the f***") was the marketing firm that did this and how much did they get paid? Pretty sure I could have come up with something better in a few hours on my MacBook Pro.

 

I hope to God that the public outcry and near unanimous disapproval will force the conference to rethink this. The names and logo aren't a day old and already they're begging for a refresh and an update.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Visit the Sports Illustrated Husker site



×
×
  • Create New...