Nexus Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 I accidentally hit Yes on the poll, but please count me a no. Logo is all kinds of wrong. Font looks straight out of a bad Western movie poster. The blue is bad too. I get that they were trying to be iconic by keeping it ultra-simple with no borders/shading/etc., it just didn't work. On the divisions, see Sparker above. Leaders??? Icons? Legends & Icons? Quote Link to comment
Vizsla1 Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 I would have like to have been part of that focus group. Just think we could have done better. Quote Link to comment
tschu Posted December 14, 2010 Author Share Posted December 14, 2010 I hate them as well. I don't think the logos are awful, but they paid enormous amounts of money for logos that anyone on earth could make. Leaders and Legends? hate hate hate Quote Link to comment
BIGREDIOWAN Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 I think it all sucks........hate the names and hate the logo. Looks like a 12 year old came up with that logo. Quote Link to comment
Caven Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 Over 100 years of history and tradition and they come up with that crap? ugh. Quote Link to comment
BornRedCornFed Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 I like the names of the divisions. The logo i dont care about. What else would they call the divisions? The Midwest and Slightly More East? Quote Link to comment
irafreak Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 How about the Nebraska Division and the Other Division? Quote Link to comment
Nexus Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 Lakes & Plains would've sufficed. However if you wanted to use spatial names, the best they could've done is: Northwest Division = Consisting of the Legends Division Southeast Division = Consisting of the Leaders Division If you look at the map below, it works with the exception of Wisconsin. Quote Link to comment
jsneb83 Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 Lakes & Plains would've sufficed. However if you wanted to use spatial names, the best they could've done is: Northwest Division = Consisting of the Legends Division Southeast Division = Consisting of the Leaders Division If you look at the map below, it works with the exception of Wisconsin. That looks like a Risk board. Quote Link to comment
WYHusk Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 It's hard to come up with words to describe how lame the division names are. Well, here's a few: lame lame lame lame lame lame. Quote Link to comment
Fuzzy Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 Lakes & Plains would've sufficed. However if you wanted to use spatial names, the best they could've done is: Northwest Division = Consisting of the Legends Division Southeast Division = Consisting of the Leaders Division If you look at the map below, it works with the exception of Wisconsin. Actually looking at that, North and South would have just been fine, the only exception would be Wisconsin being in the South but location in the North. I don't mind the logo, i think it will set in once i start seeing it painted on the field and courts around UNL. As for the name, well looking at other conferences, we just have to be the lone standing out. Everyone else has directional differences in there division names, except us. Go Leaders and Legends of the B1G TEN conference. Quote Link to comment
walksalone Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 I could care less. Quote Link to comment
HuskerNiner Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 Why not make it super nerdy and make them the Dungeons and Dragons division. Or better yet, the Empire and Rebellion divisions. Not sure where I want Nebraska in that last one though. A red storm trooper does look pretty bad ass Quote Link to comment
holvy83 Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 all of it just came off as Quote Link to comment
Hujan Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 Regarding division names . . . "Legends" actually isn't too bad. "Leaders" is complete dogsh*t. Assuming you can't find something better to pair with "Legends," I think "Honor" and "Glory" would have been better choices. Regarding logos . . . I hate the logo more than the "Leaders" name, if that's possible. If you are not going to change the name to be numerically correct or otherwise incorporate a "12" into the name, why not just keep the same logo you have now? The whole "paying homage to the original ten founding members by having the "I" and "G" in "BIG" look like a "1" and "0," respectively, is retarded. Isn't calling the g'damn conference the "Big Ten" enough of an homage? Doing both is so redundant it makes me want to vomit. Seriously, WTF (that's "Who the f***") was the marketing firm that did this and how much did they get paid? Pretty sure I could have come up with something better in a few hours on my MacBook Pro. I hope to God that the public outcry and near unanimous disapproval will force the conference to rethink this. The names and logo aren't a day old and already they're begging for a refresh and an update. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.