Hedley Lamarr Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 This one wont change. We are hammering OU on the trail this cycle. Not at all surprised, OU's program has been very pedestrian lately and its finally starting to show in their recruiting. Last 5 years OU 52-15 2 Conf championships Last 5 years NU 48-16 0 Conf championships If that is pedestrian what are we? I wouldn't call them pedestrian by any stretch. Very pedestrian 2 BCS bowls, 2 12 win seasons with the worst season being an 8-5 year. Sign me up for wanting to be pedestrian Link to comment
HUSKER FREAK Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 OU was great and seems to be slipping to Pedestrian, while we basically sucked and are on the upswing making up it to Pedestrian. So we might look a little more attractive being the team on the rise. Link to comment
dylan Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 I do not think that word means what you think it means. 3 Link to comment
StPaulHusker Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 This one wont change. We are hammering OU on the trail this cycle. Not at all surprised, OU's program has been very pedestrian lately and its finally starting to show in their recruiting. Last 5 years OU 52-15 2 Conf championships Last 5 years NU 48-16 0 Conf championships If that is pedestrian what are we? I wouldn't call them pedestrian by any stretch. Very pedestrian 2 BCS bowls, 2 12 win seasons with the worst season being an 8-5 year. Sign me up for wanting to be pedestrian I agree. We are not quite to Oklahomas level yet. They mave have plateaued a little but we have some work to do to get there. Link to comment
HuskerT Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 I'm just saying that even though they've had a good record and made BCS bowls, there doesn't seem to be much of a shine to their program right now and it could be why we're beating them out for recruits. Link to comment
It'sNotAFakeID Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 I may be wrong but isn't he announcing today? Link to comment
Amac3309 Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 I may be wrong but isn't he announcing today? I think the coaches are in home today, so I wouldn't be surprised Link to comment
Hedley Lamarr Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 As others have stated he is N. just waiting for it to go official Link to comment
B.B. Hemingway Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 As others have stated he is N. just waiting for it to go official Gotta wonder if that will be our last commit taken in this class.... I would still like too see baby Martinez N.... Athlete! Link to comment
Amac3309 Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 As others have stated he is N. just waiting for it to go official Gotta wonder if that will be our last commit taken in this class.... I would still like too see baby Martinez N.... Athlete! I bet at least 2 more plus filling in if mcwilson or walker bail last min Link to comment
Hedley Lamarr Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 As others have stated he is N. just waiting for it to go official Gotta wonder if that will be our last commit taken in this class.... I would still like too see baby Martinez N.... Athlete! I bet at least 2 more plus filling in if mcwilson or walker bail last min If Clark wants N you cannot tell him no. Also if walker bolts Badet would be a lock I would imagine Link to comment
Amac3309 Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 As others have stated he is N. just waiting for it to go official Gotta wonder if that will be our last commit taken in this class.... I would still like too see baby Martinez N.... Athlete! I bet at least 2 more plus filling in if mcwilson or walker bail last min If Clark wants N you cannot tell him no. Also if walker bolts Badet would be a lock I would imagine Agree on clark, at least we COULD take 4 more, so easy to make room, not sure if it would be badet or QA though to replace walker Link to comment
The King Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 I think some people need to brush up on the word "pedestrian". Nothing about our last few years or Oklahoma's last few years is "average" or the "norm" of what should be happening. If that was so, there'd be a lot more than 4-5 teams to win at least 9 games the last 5 years. If that was "pedestrian" 70 teams would've done it. 2 Link to comment
Hedley Lamarr Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 I think some people need to brush up on the word "pedestrian". Nothing about our last few years or Oklahoma's last few years is "average" or the "norm" of what should be happening. If that was so, there'd be a lot more than 4-5 teams to win at least 9 games the last 5 years. If that was "pedestrian" 70 teams would've done it. Oklahoma hasn't done that....however there 5 years are better than ours easily. Link to comment
Mavric Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 I think some people need to brush up on the word "pedestrian". Nothing about our last few years or Oklahoma's last few years is "average" or the "norm" of what should be happening. If that was so, there'd be a lot more than 4-5 teams to win at least 9 games the last 5 years. If that was "pedestrian" 70 teams would've done it. Oklahoma hasn't done that....however there 5 years are better than ours easily. I wouldn't say easily. I's say their last five years are better than ours by three points and one second. Link to comment
Recommended Posts