Zaimejs 133 Posted October 5, 2013 Report Share Posted October 5, 2013 So far I see no reason to ever play Martinez again? Alternative opinions? 1 Quote Link to post
jamesbond 23 Posted October 5, 2013 Report Share Posted October 5, 2013 No alternative opinion. Just agreement Quote Link to post
Minnesota_husker 2,592 Posted October 5, 2013 Report Share Posted October 5, 2013 and yet they keep throwing out Kellogg. Quote Link to post
Hercules 707 Posted October 5, 2013 Report Share Posted October 5, 2013 Love how Armstrong looks. Love how the offense looks. Disagree about Martinez, though - want to see him healthy running the offense with everybody on that unit executing the way they have been the past few games. Quote Link to post
Mavric 27,578 Posted October 5, 2013 Report Share Posted October 5, 2013 Armstrong was solid today. Far from great. He has great potential but he's not there yet. Hopefully he gets another game next week and Martinez comes back after the bye. Quote Link to post
B.B. Hemingway 5,490 Posted October 5, 2013 Report Share Posted October 5, 2013 I wouldn't argue the coaching staff sticking with Armstrong moving forward, but I still feel Martinez is the best option if healthy.... 2 Quote Link to post
Hayseed 1,231 Posted October 5, 2013 Report Share Posted October 5, 2013 Yeah, I have an alternative opinion. RKIII didn't look great today and Armstrong appears to clearly be the better of the two. If Armstrong starts stinking it up then either Martinez or Kellogg should play. Still it's hard to judge by today's game because the wind caused everyone problems and I don't think we'll see these extreme wind conditions much the rest of the season. Quote Link to post
Count 'Bility 4,786 Posted October 5, 2013 Report Share Posted October 5, 2013 I understand that once Martinez is 100%, he's gonna get the starting job back. But, first sign of trouble, inconsistency, or the vintage Martinez gaffs, and the plug will have to be pulled. Our offense has not looked as consistently steady, fluid, rythmic, and explosive as is has these last two games ever under Taylor Martinez. Now, I give Taylor the ball back when he's a 100%, because yes, it could be because Beck did "dial it down a bit" (which I dont believe, I havent noticed any major changes), but I dont expect anything different. I see Tommy as the #1 qb by season's end. 1 Quote Link to post
irafreak 986 Posted October 5, 2013 Report Share Posted October 5, 2013 Well here's a thought....is it the simplified offense that keeps us smooth or TA? I don't know just a thought... 2 Quote Link to post
whateveritis1224 383 Posted October 6, 2013 Report Share Posted October 6, 2013 I understand that once Martinez is 100%, he's gonna get the starting job back. But, first sign of trouble, inconsistency, or the vintage Martinez gaffs, and the plug will have to be pulled. Our offense has not looked as consistently steady, fluid, rythmic, and explosive as is has these last two games ever under Taylor Martinez. Now, I give Taylor the ball back when he's a 100%, because yes, it could be because Beck did "dial it down a bit" (which I dont believe, I havent noticed any major changes), but I dont expect anything different. I see Tommy as the #1 qb by season's end. Maybe not dialing it down, but changing up the practice schedule so they're practicing less plays more. 1 Quote Link to post
MichiganDad3 1,642 Posted October 6, 2013 Report Share Posted October 6, 2013 and yet they keep throwing out Kellogg. Maybe they put RK in the game so they can review some things with TA? I have no idea if this is true, but it is a possibility. Quote Link to post
roadrat 170 Posted October 6, 2013 Report Share Posted October 6, 2013 You do realize Armstrong has looked good against two really crappy defenses. I'm not sure we are learning a whole lot about him going against teams we should be beating. 2 Quote Link to post
Enhance 7,208 Posted October 6, 2013 Report Share Posted October 6, 2013 and yet they keep throwing out Kellogg. Maybe they put RK in the game so they can review some things with TA? I have no idea if this is true, but it is a possibility. Possible, but my guess is it was more to give RKIII a shot. I'd have to echo what I've read here, though - TA leads us on two scoring drives to start the game then didn't they put RKIII in right after? I understand RKIII is playing well and is a senior, but when TA is playing that well, I don't agree with pulling him. And this offense is built to accentuate TA's abilities more than RKIII's. I foresee TM being our starter once he is completely healthy, obviously, but man I'm impressed with TA. Quote Link to post
MichiganDad3 1,642 Posted October 6, 2013 Report Share Posted October 6, 2013 I think you are right. RK is only playing as a reward for a guy who put in 5 years of hard work. Quote Link to post
nebraskan 27 Posted October 6, 2013 Report Share Posted October 6, 2013 and yet they keep throwing out Kellogg. Maybe they put RK in the game so they can review some things with TA? I have no idea if this is true, but it is a possibility. this is my theory as well. give TA a series off every now and then to coach him up. it sure doesnt seem to hurt. and something I just thought of, can someone who was at the game tell the rest of us what Martinez is doing with his time on the sideline? I would hope he is involved with the O, teaching and encouraging. Quote Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.