jsneb83 Posted April 23, 2017 Share Posted April 23, 2017 Avery and Williams would put us at about #8. https://twitter.com/swiltfong247/status/855891651256090624 What is the significance of this?We're losing to Mini soda!!1!1! Quote Link to comment
swmohusker Posted April 23, 2017 Share Posted April 23, 2017 Avery and Williams would put us at about #8. https://twitter.com/swiltfong247/status/855891651256090624 What is the significance of this?We're losing to Mini soda!!1!1! They have 12 commits too Quote Link to comment
GBRFAN Posted April 23, 2017 Share Posted April 23, 2017 He is stating that team recruiting rank is only part of the story - because it is mostly based on size and we all know that size will not happen in this cycle. The critics are going to state at the end of this cycle that 20th was the best MR could do. I believe MattyIce is just trying to get people to look at star averages so that we don't have unnecessary let down when this cycle is over. If we were looking at a class of 25 and we grabbed similar players we would probably be looking at top10. Sorry if this has been interpreted incorrectly... Quote Link to comment
ScottyIce Posted April 23, 2017 Share Posted April 23, 2017 He is stating that team recruiting rank is only part of the story - because it is mostly based on size and we all know that size will not happen in this cycle. The critics are going to state at the end of this cycle that 20th was the best MR could do. I believe MattyIce is just trying to get people to look at star averages so that we don't have unnecessary let down when this cycle is over. If we were looking at a class of 25 and we grabbed similar players we would probably be looking at top10. Sorry if this has been interpreted incorrectly... Basically that and at this point it's completely insignificant where you're ranked. You guys think NW and Minnesota end up in top 25 for recruiting? I personally doubt it! Quote Link to comment
swmohusker Posted April 23, 2017 Share Posted April 23, 2017 He is stating that team recruiting rank is only part of the story - because it is mostly based on size and we all know that size will not happen in this cycle. The critics are going to state at the end of this cycle that 20th was the best MR could do. I believe MattyIce is just trying to get people to look at star averages so that we don't have unnecessary let down when this cycle is over. If we were looking at a class of 25 and we grabbed similar players we would probably be looking at top10. Sorry if this has been interpreted incorrectly... Basically that and at this point it's completely insignificant where you're ranked. You guys think NW and Minnesota end up in top 25 for recruiting? I personally doubt it! Then could you start a new thread? Doesn't really belong in who's next. More of an interpretation to star rankings and recruiting classes thread. Quote Link to comment
ScottyIce Posted April 23, 2017 Share Posted April 23, 2017 He is stating that team recruiting rank is only part of the story - because it is mostly based on size and we all know that size will not happen in this cycle. The critics are going to state at the end of this cycle that 20th was the best MR could do. I believe MattyIce is just trying to get people to look at star averages so that we don't have unnecessary let down when this cycle is over. If we were looking at a class of 25 and we grabbed similar players we would probably be looking at top10. Sorry if this has been interpreted incorrectly... Basically that and at this point it's completely insignificant where you're ranked. You guys think NW and Minnesota end up in top 25 for recruiting? I personally doubt it!Then could you start a new thread? Doesn't really belong in who's next. More of an interpretation to star rankings and recruiting classes thread. Our recruiting ranking doesn't pertain to who is next either? 1 Quote Link to comment
PaulCrewe Posted April 23, 2017 Share Posted April 23, 2017 He is stating that team recruiting rank is only part of the story - because it is mostly based on size and we all know that size will not happen in this cycle. The critics are going to state at the end of this cycle that 20th was the best MR could do. I believe MattyIce is just trying to get people to look at star averages so that we don't have unnecessary let down when this cycle is over. If we were looking at a class of 25 and we grabbed similar players we would probably be looking at top10. Sorry if this has been interpreted incorrectly... Basically that and at this point it's completely insignificant where you're ranked. You guys think NW and Minnesota end up in top 25 for recruiting? I personally doubt it!Then could you start a new thread? Doesn't really belong in who's next. More of an interpretation to star rankings and recruiting classes thread. Our recruiting ranking doesn't pertain to who is next either? The 2018 recruiting thread would probably be the wiser option of the two. And as far as ranking vs star average......talk about deja vu 1 Quote Link to comment
famoustitles Posted April 23, 2017 Share Posted April 23, 2017 Sooooo?????.... a needle pulling thread 3 Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted April 23, 2017 Share Posted April 23, 2017 Sooooo?????.... a needle pulling thread Well played. Quote Link to comment
ScottyIce Posted April 23, 2017 Share Posted April 23, 2017 Williams or Avery. Lots of cb's ✅ 1 Quote Link to comment
Huskerchussetts Posted April 23, 2017 Share Posted April 23, 2017 Williams or Avery. Lots of cb's✅ Tip of the hat matty, Nice call. Adding to the db talent pool. Doesn't really matter the ranking this class is bringing in some talented players Quote Link to comment
ScottyIce Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 Um. Chase Williams in next. Very soon. Oops, I predicted him twice apparently 1 Quote Link to comment
Redux Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 You would! EVERYBODY MAKE FUN OF MATTY! Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.