Jump to content


Questioning the coaching search timeline


knapplc

Recommended Posts



Wow Marvic didn't think you would feel that way about things.

 

My feeling on Bret B is that he really was too much like BP to go after. I believe that we never offered.

 

I don't have a hard time thinking that he only targeted Riley, I think Wisconsin took a hard look at him so he knew him coming into the situation.

 

To me it sounds like you think he didn't do his homework. I think it is the opposite. I think he did a lot homework decided this is who he wanted and went after him. If Riley said no than move to second choice.

 

Whether MR gets it done or not is to be seen, but I think it is a bold out of the box choice

  • Fire 1
Link to comment

Again, I don't think Riley is a terrible hire. But when we knew this was coming for at least one year and probably several, were certain that's what we were doing for about a month then settle on a guy who's main selling point is other schools wanted him 12 years ago, he had some good seasons 8-10 years ago, he SHOULD do better at a bigger school and he's a nice guy, I'm not sure why we had to go for that four days after we fired our previous coach.

Solid take on the situation, Mav.

 

I'd say the four days was simply due diligence on our Administration's part.

 

I agree that hiring a 61-year-old coach is odd, and there were seemingly better candidates out there. Perhaps hiring a man in the waning years of his career is part of a long-term plan?

Link to comment

 

 

Samuel McKewon ‏@swmckewonOWH

Perlman on Bielema: “If he came here do you think we’d have much confidence he would stay?”

 

 

drop6.gif

Trying to steal my posts?

 

I hope this doesn't imply that Perlman wants only HC candidates that nobody would ever want. :confucius

 

Considering BB ditched Wisconsin for Arkansas. Then after two years, ditched Arkansas for Nebraska. How long before he ditches us? That was my major red flag with BB.

Link to comment

Riley was on Alvarez's short list. It doesn't surprise me that he was on Eichorst's as well. I firmly believe that this was a done deal before Pelini was ever out the door. For obvious reasons, NU just had to make it look like it wasn't. When institutions are making strategic decisions on that level, they typically like to make damn sure of the outcome so they don't look stupid (especially after the Steve P debacle).

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...