BigRedBuster Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Just curious.... If you are an offensive tackle. Why would the run/pass issues at a school play a factor in your decision? Well....let me put it another way. Why would seeing a team run the ball well excite you more than seeing the team most of the year be pretty committed to having a strong passing attack? Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Just curious.... If you are an offensive tackle. Why would the run/pass issues at a school play a factor in your decision? Well....let me put it another way. Why would seeing a team run the ball well excite you more than seeing the team most of the year be pretty committed to having a strong passing attack? The general consensus is offensive lineman like run blocking more than pass blocking because they can be aggressive instead of more passive. But that's obviously just a generalization. Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Just curious.... If you are an offensive tackle. Why would the run/pass issues at a school play a factor in your decision? Well....let me put it another way. Why would seeing a team run the ball well excite you more than seeing the team most of the year be pretty committed to having a strong passing attack? The general consensus is offensive lineman like run blocking more than pass blocking because they can be aggressive instead of more passive. But that's obviously just a generalization. If an OT is even remotely considering playing in the NFL, I would think he would be interested in a program that views pass protection as important. I do understand your point as far as what is more fun though. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Just curious.... If you are an offensive tackle. Why would the run/pass issues at a school play a factor in your decision? Well....let me put it another way. Why would seeing a team run the ball well excite you more than seeing the team most of the year be pretty committed to having a strong passing attack? The general consensus is offensive lineman like run blocking more than pass blocking because they can be aggressive instead of more passive. But that's obviously just a generalization. If an OT is even remotely considering playing in the NFL, I would think he would be interested in a program that views pass protection as important. I do understand your point as far as what is more fun though. I agree. Difference between what you like to do and what you need to do. Quote Link to comment
Warrior10 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Wonder what the deal is with the huge rating gap between 247 and the other services on this guy? 4 star on Rivals/Scout...2 star on 247. Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Wonder what the deal is with the huge rating gap between 247 and the other services on this guy? 4 star on Rivals/Scout...2 star on 247. He's rated .8669 which is a solid 3 star on 247. 89 would get him to 4 star. Quote Link to comment
Atbone95 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Wonder what the deal is with the huge rating gap between 247 and the other services on this guy? 4 star on Rivals/Scout...2 star on 247. He's rated .8669 which is a solid 3 star on 247. 89 would get him to 4 star. That's composite, though. He's a .78 2 star on their ratings. Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Wonder what the deal is with the huge rating gap between 247 and the other services on this guy? 4 star on Rivals/Scout...2 star on 247. He's rated .8669 which is a solid 3 star on 247. 89 would get him to 4 star. That's composite, though. He's a .78 2 star on their ratings. OK...that's why I only pay attention to the composite ratings. More people's input. 1 Quote Link to comment
Warrior10 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Wonder what the deal is with the huge rating gap between 247 and the other services on this guy? 4 star on Rivals/Scout...2 star on 247. He's rated .8669 which is a solid 3 star on 247. 89 would get him to 4 star. That's composite, though. He's a .78 2 star on their ratings. OK...that's why I only pay attention to the composite ratings. More people's input.I agree, just dont see that big of gap usually. Quote Link to comment
RedRedJarvisRedwine Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Wonder what the deal is with the huge rating gap between 247 and the other services on this guy? 4 star on Rivals/Scout...2 star on 247.He's rated .8669 which is a solid 3 star on 247. 89 would get him to 4 star. That's composite, though. He's a .78 2 star on their ratings. OK...that's why I only pay attention to the composite ratings. More people's input.I agree, just dont see that big of gap usually. Thigh gap? Quote Link to comment
Day by Day Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Wonder what the deal is with the huge rating gap between 247 and the other services on this guy? 4 star on Rivals/Scout...2 star on 247. He's rated .8669 which is a solid 3 star on 247. 89 would get him to 4 star. That's composite, though. He's a .78 2 star on their ratings. OK...that's why I only pay attention to the composite ratings. More people's input.I agree, just dont see that big of gap usually. Thigh gap? On this guy, no thank you. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted January 11, 2016 Share Posted January 11, 2016 Down to Florida State and LSU. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 Committed to Mississippi State Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.