Mavric Posted June 18, 2017 Author Share Posted June 18, 2017 STOCK DOWN Cameron Jurgens This is not really about a loss of appreciation for Jurgens’ physical tools but more about the lessening chances that he plays defense in college. Jurgens is listed as an athlete, and his Rivals100 rating is due to our projection of his college potential on the defensive side of the football. Nebraska is solidifying their plans to play him on offense, though, and we would not rate him that high as a tight end prospect. Rivals Quote Link to comment
Warrior10 Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Down 9 spots on 247 to #83. 1 Quote Link to comment
Thanks_Tom RR Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Down 9 spots on 247 to #83. So...bust? Quote Link to comment
Huskers44 Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 Of all the photoshops I've seen so far. This is the worst. Quote Link to comment
spurs1990 Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 Of all the photoshops I've seen so far. This is the worst. Have you seen our kickers arms? 1 Quote Link to comment
Huskers44 Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 Of all the photoshops I've seen so far. This is the worst.Have you seen our kickers arms?Yes, I laughed at that one too. Quote Link to comment
Huskers93-97 Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 Anyone know why we are set on him at TE? If he is .94 TE and everyone says he would be even higher if LB. couldn't we use a say .96 talent at LB more than TE. I think we have solid up n coming TEs. Is it a deal he wants shot at offense so we playing ball with him but by year 2 he a LB? Quote Link to comment
GBRFAN Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 Anyone know why we are set on him at TE? If he is .94 TE and everyone says he would be even higher if LB. couldn't we use a say .96 talent at LB more than TE. I think we have solid up n coming TEs. Is it a deal he wants shot at offense so we playing ball with him but by year 2 he a LB? Can i answer this question in 3 years? Quote Link to comment
MyBloodIsRed16 Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 Anyone know why we are set on him at TE? If he is .94 TE and everyone says he would be even higher if LB. couldn't we use a say .96 talent at LB more than TE. I think we have solid up n coming TEs. Is it a deal he wants shot at offense so we playing ball with him but by year 2 he a LB?Maybe coaches don't feel we are very solid at TE? I'm sure when it comes down to it once he gets on campus they will put him where he will help most Quote Link to comment
Huskers93-97 Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 True. I just noticed everyone TE we been offering has been 6-5 to 6-7 so he seemed a tad short for what they seem to target Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.