Why is it just because of the setting, that they pass up the big12?
It's because all the champs have to play 12 regular season games, just like the Big XII, but they also have to win an extra playoff game, unlike the Big XII.
Lol wow.So people say that FSU played no one and and cite that as being why they didn't deserve in even though they won all their games.
Meanwhile we are saying the big12 should be penalized for not having a championship game, played 9 conference games, and most played a power 5 ooc too.
Basically were giving benefits to conferences that play 8 games within its league, get a 9 game becuz of a title game, and have an extra "patsy" on the schedule.
Literally everything is essentially equal except the big 10, acc, and sec play an extra "southern miss".
That's the difference. Just because it's called a championship game shouldn't matter when it comes to the comparables.
FSU was literally lucky and got saved against Notre Dame. Watch the end of that game. It wasn't resiliancy that won them that game. Honestly they played like crap that game but somehow were gifted a win. Then they beat what, Duke in the ACC title game. Lol their road was way easier than the other 3 playoff participants, and they struggled more in most of their games. Probably why Oregon piss pounded them the way they did.
TCU and Baylor played 9 conference games. Whoopty doo. Their OOC schedules were a joke besides the TCU v Minny game. Ohio State played 9 conference games too, and curb stomped Wiscy in the last one. Plus they played an extra OOC opponent. And sorry the who had a better loss argument is something ESPN would pull in this scenario. Ohio State had just lost some starters if I am not mistaken, but I digress.
Stack TCU's W/L record next to tOSU and lets compare.
TCU- 11-1 (8-1 Big 12) Conference Co champ
tOSU- 12-1 (9-0 Big Ten) Outright Title Game Champ
I rest my case.
The fact that you don't know who FSU played and beat in the ACC title game, tells me you don't pay attention to anything other than the Huskers, so for me personally, I wouldn't take you for a credible person at all. There fore I might nod and say yes and give you BS responses while in my head think about how you have no clue what you are talking about. That's just me though. It's an easy way to evaluate who to listen to and who not to. Also about the Notre Dame game, they didn't luck out. If you are talking about the pick play, it was clearly illegal and if you are blind to the fact that FSU was down in so many games and found a way to score points when they needed it most and you are still calling it luck. Well…reread my first comments.
To further things....
TCU played these ranked teams:
#4 Oklahoma
#5 Baylor -LOSS
#15 Okie State
#20 WVU
#7 KSU
#9 Ole Miss
They won the Peach Bowl to finish 12-1
Ohio State played these ranked opponents
#7 MSU
#11 Wisconsin
#1 Alabama
#2 Oregon
Won semifinal and college footbal national championship playoff game to finish 14-1
Wow, TCU played more ranked teams huh? Not when you look at the final rankings.
Unranked OU
#9 Baylor -LOSS
Unranked Okie Lite
Unranked WVU
#21 KSU
#12 Ole Miss
Hmmmm, so really just 3 ranked teams.
How about the Buckeyes?
#5 MSU
#14 Wiscy
#3 Alabama
#2 Oregon
Woah, 3 top 5 teams and 1 top 15. Plus an extra 2 games on the season to boot. Pretty clear to me who wins the better season debate.
I get your point, and it's a decent one, however, when discussing the playoff selections and merit for each team, we can't use the playoff games they played as part of that merit. During the selections process they don't have the luxury of looking into the future.
In that case OSU was 2-0 vs ranked teams and 10-1 vs Unranked.
TCU was 9-0 vs Unranked and 1-1 vs Ranked.
At this point it becomes down to losses in my opinion. It's how you decide to slice the bread. Throwing all the scores out, and just looking at W's vs L's….we're seriously saying that OSU's extra game vs Navy, or Kent State is the difference. Because OSU had 3 OOC games that aren't P5. That is where the extra game comes from. Not the championship game.
I guess now, I'm just gunna move my argument and say that they just need to put the 5 champs in. Let the 4-5 seed play in the middle of bowl season, then the winner play the 1 seed on Dec 31, in the semifinal
In that scenario, Baylor/TCU plays OSU for the right to get into the playoff….
I don't see that happening so the best scenario is for Big12 to dissolve and make 4 conferences, and make them regional, as best as they can. They have 1 choice. 64 teams and each conference required to do a pod system within it's conference. Play a title game. Then the champs all qualify for the playoff with NO non winners eligible regardless of who wins the Championship games (if you were 9-3 and won, you're in).
Committee then seeds them according to subjective merit. We're all good then.
Kicker is, Notre Dame can join a conference but this will likely kick out Iowa State or someone like that.