What Did We Learn: Iowa Edition

[Enhance]

 

 

 

Where do people place more of the blame on that 4th down - on Langsdorf or TA?

 

I noticed a lot of people on Twitter saying 'don't blame Langsdorf because he didn't throw the ball.' While true, it's also a coaches job to put a QB (and the team) in a position to win the game. Did Langsdorf and the coaches put TA and the team in the right spot there to convert, while understanding the limitations TA has?

totally TA. The wide open receiver proves that langsdorf put Tommy in a great position. People can claim that DL needs to know his qb's strengths and weaknesses so he should've justhe ran the ball, but a 3 year starting qb for a power 5 school should have enough common sense to know game situation and that 4th and 1 means you don't need to and shouldn't go for a home run shot, especially when you have a wide open receiver a couple yards past the 1st down. Obviously TA would've still had to get it to carter accurately enough to catch, and carter in turn would've had to make the catch, but the coaches still put them in a position to make the play. Tommy didn't even look at the check down and stared down the fly fade the whole way.

But here's the thing....TA has been a 3-year starter and in that time has shown no consistency in being able to make those throws. It's not like him missing that throw was an anomaly. It's what Tommy does, and DL should recognize that. Now if Tommy were a freshman and hadn't shown such inconsistently I would feel better with the call, but DL is not playing to Tommy's strengths.

I understand but the biggest thing is that TA didn't even bother looking down at the check down, he just went straight for the low percentage home run ball. It's not like throw was just that bad. It was a decent throw to give the WR an opportunity to either go for the catch or try to I draw a pass interference. The DB just made a better play defensively. My point is as a 3 year starter Tommy should have enough common sense to know he shouldn't throw the home run ball and that he still had over 4 minutes with 3 timeouts, on 4th down. Know the other routes for the play and find someone else that perhaps isn't being covered like a blanket. Maybe we should've just run it, though, since Tommy is barely even able to decipher when to bite the bullet and throw the ball away, let alone find an open check down reciever.

 

I see what you're saying, but at what point do you put more blame on the coaches?

 

TA has lost every single game, or at least the vast majority of games, where he has had to throw more than 40 times.

 

I don't think it's as simple as "Tommy should have enough common sense." It's a coach's job to put his players in the best position to win. By your same reasoning, you could argue that Tom Brady and Tyrod Taylor should always be coached and put in similar positions to convert 4th and 1 because they should just have enough common sense. However, I think we'd both agree how a team might approach a 4th and 1 with Brady is much different than how the Bills would approach 4th and 1 with Taylor.

 

The same principles apply, here, imho.

[RADAR]

 

 

 

 

Where do people place more of the blame on that 4th down - on Langsdorf or TA?

 

I noticed a lot of people on Twitter saying 'don't blame Langsdorf because he didn't throw the ball.' While true, it's also a coaches job to put a QB (and the team) in a position to win the game. Did Langsdorf and the coaches put TA and the team in the right spot there to convert, while understanding the limitations TA has?

totally TA. The wide open receiver proves that langsdorf put Tommy in a great position. People can claim that DL needs to know his qb's strengths and weaknesses so he should've justhe ran the ball, but a 3 year starting qb for a power 5 school should have enough common sense to know game situation and that 4th and 1 means you don't need to and shouldn't go for a home run shot, especially when you have a wide open receiver a couple yards past the 1st down. Obviously TA would've still had to get it to carter accurately enough to catch, and carter in turn would've had to make the catch, but the coaches still put them in a position to make the play. Tommy didn't even look at the check down and stared down the fly fade the whole way.

But here's the thing....TA has been a 3-year starter and in that time has shown no consistency in being able to make those throws. It's not like him missing that throw was an anomaly. It's what Tommy does, and DL should recognize that. Now if Tommy were a freshman and hadn't shown such inconsistently I would feel better with the call, but DL is not playing to Tommy's strengths.

I understand but the biggest thing is that TA didn't even bother looking down at the check down, he just went straight for the low percentage home run ball. It's not like throw was just that bad. It was a decent throw to give the WR an opportunity to either go for the catch or try to I draw a pass interference. The DB just made a better play defensively. My point is as a 3 year starter Tommy should have enough common sense to know he shouldn't throw the home run ball and that he still had over 4 minutes with 3 timeouts, on 4th down. Know the other routes for the play and find someone else that perhaps isn't being covered like a blanket. Maybe we should've just run it, though, since Tommy is barely even able to decipher when to bite the bullet and throw the ball away, let alone find an open check down reciever.

 

I see what you're saying, but at what point do you put more blame on the coaches?

 

TA has lost every single game, or at least the vast majority of games, where he has had to throw more than 40 times.

 

I don't think it's as simple as "Tommy should have enough common sense." It's a coach's job to put his players in the best position to win. By your same reasoning, you could argue that Tom Brady and Tyrod Taylor should always be coached and put in similar positions to convert 4th and 1 because they should just have enough common sense. However, I think we'd both agree how a team might approach a 4th and 1 with Brady is much different than how the Bills would approach 4th and 1 with Taylor.

 

The same principles apply, here, imho.

 

Put him in a position to win like against Illinois when he was told to run the ball and threw it anyway an lost the game? Sometimes you can't fix stupid and I think we found that out against Iowa.

[Enhance]

 

 

 

 

 

Where do people place more of the blame on that 4th down - on Langsdorf or TA?

 

I noticed a lot of people on Twitter saying 'don't blame Langsdorf because he didn't throw the ball.' While true, it's also a coaches job to put a QB (and the team) in a position to win the game. Did Langsdorf and the coaches put TA and the team in the right spot there to convert, while understanding the limitations TA has?

totally TA. The wide open receiver proves that langsdorf put Tommy in a great position. People can claim that DL needs to know his qb's strengths and weaknesses so he should've justhe ran the ball, but a 3 year starting qb for a power 5 school should have enough common sense to know game situation and that 4th and 1 means you don't need to and shouldn't go for a home run shot, especially when you have a wide open receiver a couple yards past the 1st down. Obviously TA would've still had to get it to carter accurately enough to catch, and carter in turn would've had to make the catch, but the coaches still put them in a position to make the play. Tommy didn't even look at the check down and stared down the fly fade the whole way.

But here's the thing....TA has been a 3-year starter and in that time has shown no consistency in being able to make those throws. It's not like him missing that throw was an anomaly. It's what Tommy does, and DL should recognize that. Now if Tommy were a freshman and hadn't shown such inconsistently I would feel better with the call, but DL is not playing to Tommy's strengths.

I understand but the biggest thing is that TA didn't even bother looking down at the check down, he just went straight for the low percentage home run ball. It's not like throw was just that bad. It was a decent throw to give the WR an opportunity to either go for the catch or try to I draw a pass interference. The DB just made a better play defensively. My point is as a 3 year starter Tommy should have enough common sense to know he shouldn't throw the home run ball and that he still had over 4 minutes with 3 timeouts, on 4th down. Know the other routes for the play and find someone else that perhaps isn't being covered like a blanket. Maybe we should've just run it, though, since Tommy is barely even able to decipher when to bite the bullet and throw the ball away, let alone find an open check down reciever.

 

I see what you're saying, but at what point do you put more blame on the coaches?

 

TA has lost every single game, or at least the vast majority of games, where he has had to throw more than 40 times.

 

I don't think it's as simple as "Tommy should have enough common sense." It's a coach's job to put his players in the best position to win. By your same reasoning, you could argue that Tom Brady and Tyrod Taylor should always be coached and put in similar positions to convert 4th and 1 because they should just have enough common sense. However, I think we'd both agree how a team might approach a 4th and 1 with Brady is much different than how the Bills would approach 4th and 1 with Taylor.

 

The same principles apply, here, imho.

 

Put him in a position to win like against Illinois when he was told to run the ball and threw it anyway an lost the game? Sometimes you can't fix stupid and I think we found that out against Iowa.

 

You raise a great point I can't really argue with. But, those are two different situations - one was an obvious communication error and the other was TA not reading the defense and throwing a bad ball. TA shouldn't have been asked to throw that ball or put in a position to think that was OK. Is it on him for throwing it? Yes, but, I put blame on the coaches for giving him the choice.

[Husker Psycho]

I learned that a team that gains 250 yards of offense and goes 0 for 9 on 3rd down is 'steady and solid' according to the media.

I also learned that when a team fumbles 3 times, with another nullified by an unrelated penalty, it's 'mistake-free' execution

 

Those statistics are totally meaningless... they mean nothing.

 

Iowa scored 2 touchdowns on 7 plays in the third quarter. And they won the game. Those are the statistics that matter.

 

Jeez...

[74Hunter]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Where do people place more of the blame on that 4th down - on Langsdorf or TA?

 

I noticed a lot of people on Twitter saying 'don't blame Langsdorf because he didn't throw the ball.' While true, it's also a coaches job to put a QB (and the team) in a position to win the game. Did Langsdorf and the coaches put TA and the team in the right spot there to convert, while understanding the limitations TA has?

totally TA. The wide open receiver proves that langsdorf put Tommy in a great position. People can claim that DL needs to know his qb's strengths and weaknesses so he should've justhe ran the ball, but a 3 year starting qb for a power 5 school should have enough common sense to know game situation and that 4th and 1 means you don't need to and shouldn't go for a home run shot, especially when you have a wide open receiver a couple yards past the 1st down. Obviously TA would've still had to get it to carter accurately enough to catch, and carter in turn would've had to make the catch, but the coaches still put them in a position to make the play. Tommy didn't even look at the check down and stared down the fly fade the whole way.

But here's the thing....TA has been a 3-year starter and in that time has shown no consistency in being able to make those throws. It's not like him missing that throw was an anomaly. It's what Tommy does, and DL should recognize that. Now if Tommy were a freshman and hadn't shown such inconsistently I would feel better with the call, but DL is not playing to Tommy's strengths.

I understand but the biggest thing is that TA didn't even bother looking down at the check down, he just went straight for the low percentage home run ball. It's not like throw was just that bad. It was a decent throw to give the WR an opportunity to either go for the catch or try to I draw a pass interference. The DB just made a better play defensively. My point is as a 3 year starter Tommy should have enough common sense to know he shouldn't throw the home run ball and that he still had over 4 minutes with 3 timeouts, on 4th down. Know the other routes for the play and find someone else that perhaps isn't being covered like a blanket. Maybe we should've just run it, though, since Tommy is barely even able to decipher when to bite the bullet and throw the ball away, let alone find an open check down reciever.

I see what you're saying, but at what point do you put more blame on the coaches?

 

TA has lost every single game, or at least the vast majority of games, where he has had to throw more than 40 times.

 

I don't think it's as simple as "Tommy should have enough common sense." It's a coach's job to put his players in the best position to win. By your same reasoning, you could argue that Tom Brady and Tyrod Taylor should always be coached and put in similar positions to convert 4th and 1 because they should just have enough common sense. However, I think we'd both agree how a team might approach a 4th and 1 with Brady is much different than how the Bills would approach 4th and 1 with Taylor.

 

The same principles apply, here, imho.

Put him in a position to win like against Illinois when he was told to run the ball and threw it anyway an lost the game? Sometimes you can't fix stupid and I think we found that out against Iowa.

You raise a great point I can't really argue with. But, those are two different situations - one was an obvious communication error and the other was TA not reading the defense and throwing a bad ball. TA shouldn't have been asked to throw that ball or put in a position to think that was OK. Is it on him for throwing it? Yes, but, I put blame on the coaches for giving him the choice.

Other than the fact that it was a pass play tagged no pass and the entire offense ran it as a pass play.

[ColoradoHusk]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Where do people place more of the blame on that 4th down - on Langsdorf or TA?

 

I noticed a lot of people on Twitter saying 'don't blame Langsdorf because he didn't throw the ball.' While true, it's also a coaches job to put a QB (and the team) in a position to win the game. Did Langsdorf and the coaches put TA and the team in the right spot there to convert, while understanding the limitations TA has?

totally TA. The wide open receiver proves that langsdorf put Tommy in a great position. People can claim that DL needs to know his qb's strengths and weaknesses so he should've justhe ran the ball, but a 3 year starting qb for a power 5 school should have enough common sense to know game situation and that 4th and 1 means you don't need to and shouldn't go for a home run shot, especially when you have a wide open receiver a couple yards past the 1st down. Obviously TA would've still had to get it to carter accurately enough to catch, and carter in turn would've had to make the catch, but the coaches still put them in a position to make the play. Tommy didn't even look at the check down and stared down the fly fade the whole way.

But here's the thing....TA has been a 3-year starter and in that time has shown no consistency in being able to make those throws. It's not like him missing that throw was an anomaly. It's what Tommy does, and DL should recognize that. Now if Tommy were a freshman and hadn't shown such inconsistently I would feel better with the call, but DL is not playing to Tommy's strengths.

I understand but the biggest thing is that TA didn't even bother looking down at the check down, he just went straight for the low percentage home run ball. It's not like throw was just that bad. It was a decent throw to give the WR an opportunity to either go for the catch or try to I draw a pass interference. The DB just made a better play defensively. My point is as a 3 year starter Tommy should have enough common sense to know he shouldn't throw the home run ball and that he still had over 4 minutes with 3 timeouts, on 4th down. Know the other routes for the play and find someone else that perhaps isn't being covered like a blanket. Maybe we should've just run it, though, since Tommy is barely even able to decipher when to bite the bullet and throw the ball away, let alone find an open check down reciever.

I see what you're saying, but at what point do you put more blame on the coaches?

 

TA has lost every single game, or at least the vast majority of games, where he has had to throw more than 40 times.

 

I don't think it's as simple as "Tommy should have enough common sense." It's a coach's job to put his players in the best position to win. By your same reasoning, you could argue that Tom Brady and Tyrod Taylor should always be coached and put in similar positions to convert 4th and 1 because they should just have enough common sense. However, I think we'd both agree how a team might approach a 4th and 1 with Brady is much different than how the Bills would approach 4th and 1 with Taylor.

 

The same principles apply, here, imho.

Put him in a position to win like against Illinois when he was told to run the ball and threw it anyway an lost the game? Sometimes you can't fix stupid and I think we found that out against Iowa.

You raise a great point I can't really argue with. But, those are two different situations - one was an obvious communication error and the other was TA not reading the defense and throwing a bad ball. TA shouldn't have been asked to throw that ball or put in a position to think that was OK. Is it on him for throwing it? Yes, but, I put blame on the coaches for giving him the choice.

Other than the fact that it was a pass play tagged no pass and the entire offense ran it as a pass play.

Yep, we want the entire team to run it as a pass play and give the tiniest tag on the play to let the QB know not to pass it, and we should be shocked when it doesn't work out. Sounds perfect.

[krc1995]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Where do people place more of the blame on that 4th down - on Langsdorf or TA?

 

I noticed a lot of people on Twitter saying 'don't blame Langsdorf because he didn't throw the ball.' While true, it's also a coaches job to put a QB (and the team) in a position to win the game. Did Langsdorf and the coaches put TA and the team in the right spot there to convert, while understanding the limitations TA has?

totally TA. The wide open receiver proves that langsdorf put Tommy in a great position. People can claim that DL needs to know his qb's strengths and weaknesses so he should've justhe ran the ball, but a 3 year starting qb for a power 5 school should have enough common sense to know game situation and that 4th and 1 means you don't need to and shouldn't go for a home run shot, especially when you have a wide open receiver a couple yards past the 1st down. Obviously TA would've still had to get it to carter accurately enough to catch, and carter in turn would've had to make the catch, but the coaches still put them in a position to make the play. Tommy didn't even look at the check down and stared down the fly fade the whole way.

But here's the thing....TA has been a 3-year starter and in that time has shown no consistency in being able to make those throws. It's not like him missing that throw was an anomaly. It's what Tommy does, and DL should recognize that. Now if Tommy were a freshman and hadn't shown such inconsistently I would feel better with the call, but DL is not playing to Tommy's strengths.

I understand but the biggest thing is that TA didn't even bother looking down at the check down, he just went straight for the low percentage home run ball. It's not like throw was just that bad. It was a decent throw to give the WR an opportunity to either go for the catch or try to I draw a pass interference. The DB just made a better play defensively. My point is as a 3 year starter Tommy should have enough common sense to know he shouldn't throw the home run ball and that he still had over 4 minutes with 3 timeouts, on 4th down. Know the other routes for the play and find someone else that perhaps isn't being covered like a blanket. Maybe we should've just run it, though, since Tommy is barely even able to decipher when to bite the bullet and throw the ball away, let alone find an open check down reciever.

I see what you're saying, but at what point do you put more blame on the coaches?

 

TA has lost every single game, or at least the vast majority of games, where he has had to throw more than 40 times.

 

I don't think it's as simple as "Tommy should have enough common sense." It's a coach's job to put his players in the best position to win. By your same reasoning, you could argue that Tom Brady and Tyrod Taylor should always be coached and put in similar positions to convert 4th and 1 because they should just have enough common sense. However, I think we'd both agree how a team might approach a 4th and 1 with Brady is much different than how the Bills would approach 4th and 1 with Taylor.

 

The same principles apply, here, imho.

Put him in a position to win like against Illinois when he was told to run the ball and threw it anyway an lost the game? Sometimes you can't fix stupid and I think we found that out against Iowa.

You raise a great point I can't really argue with. But, those are two different situations - one was an obvious communication error and the other was TA not reading the defense and throwing a bad ball. TA shouldn't have been asked to throw that ball or put in a position to think that was OK. Is it on him for throwing it? Yes, but, I put blame on the coaches for giving him the choice.

Other than the fact that it was a pass play tagged no pass and the entire offense ran it as a pass play.

Yep, we want the entire team to run it as a pass play and give the tiniest tag on the play to let the QB know not to pass it, and we should be shocked when it doesn't work out. Sounds perfect.

@Radar I get some of what your saying and may even agree to some extent about Tommy taking accountability, but when you imply that Tommy is stupid (as in can't fix stupid) that is very offensive to me and to perhaps others. These kids come here, live here for 4+ years, dedicated the majority of their lives to the thing we cherish, and you're gonna call him stupid because he makes your golden coaches look bad. TOMMY had a terrible day- yes. Some of it was poor coaching and poor play calling and poor QB play and your really cant separate the three so its on all of them. They share this burden

 

[KazLong]

I learned, that it would be really nice if the Huskers installed a few gaint heat lamps for these god awful cold games. (just like a warming tent) Learned that coffee only makes me feel better for a few mins, also learned 50 people will line up for hot chocolate when you can get coffee pretty quick and it is hotter.

 

I regret just selling one of my tickets and going with the other.

 

I have a theory that Radar is someone from the TnT show, they were discussing today that there show is actively trolling 'certain' husker boards for lolz, for a while it sounds like. They discuss a lot of our fan theories and make fun of us almost every morning. Not saying it is our board but def trolling some husker boards, they talked openly about doing it today, to get material for the show. I believe they stated been doing it sense earlier this year...

 

Not sure which segment it was in if anyone is interested. I can try to find it tomorrow when at work if anyone is interested.

 

http://www.tntradioempire.com/AUDIO/podcast/

[It'sNotAFakeID]

That this:

 

 

is somehow not a hold.

[Enhance]

That this:

 

 

is somehow not a hold.

This to me kind of looks like one of those plays where if they called it every time there'd be 40 holds a game. Kind of seems so routine now they let this slide.

 

However, I've noticed across the B1G and college football this year that holding is an uncommon call - jokingly uncommon, even when it's patently obvious.

[krc1995]

I learned, that it would be really nice if the Huskers installed a few gaint heat lamps for these god awful cold games. (just like a warming tent) Learned that coffee only makes me feel better for a few mins, also learned 50 people will line up for hot chocolate when you can get coffee pretty quick and it is hotter.

 

I regret just selling one of my tickets and going with the other.

 

I have a theory that Radar is someone from the TnT show, they were discussing today that there show is actively trolling 'certain' husker boards for lolz, for a while it sounds like. They discuss a lot of our fan theories and make fun of us almost every morning. Not saying it is our board but def trolling some husker boards, they talked openly about doing it today, to get material for the show. I believe they stated been doing it sense earlier this year...

 

Not sure which segment it was in if anyone is interested. I can try to find it tomorrow when at work if anyone is interested.

 

http://www.tntradioempire.com/AUDIO/podcast/

The women restroom in the south stadium has blowing heaters I just assumed the guys would have it as well

[commando]

I learned, that it would be really nice if the Huskers installed a few gaint heat lamps for these god awful cold games. (just like a warming tent) Learned that coffee only makes me feel better for a few mins, also learned 50 people will line up for hot chocolate when you can get coffee pretty quick and it is hotter.

 

I regret just selling one of my tickets and going with the other.

 

I have a theory that Radar is someone from the TnT show, they were discussing today that there show is actively trolling 'certain' husker boards for lolz, for a while it sounds like. They discuss a lot of our fan theories and make fun of us almost every morning. Not saying it is our board but def trolling some husker boards, they talked openly about doing it today, to get material for the show. I believe they stated been doing it sense earlier this year...

 

Not sure which segment it was in if anyone is interested. I can try to find it tomorrow when at work if anyone is interested.

 

http://www.tntradioempire.com/AUDIO/podcast/

is the tnt show still a thing? those guys got very old a long time ago

[Saunders]

 

 

 

 

 

Where do people place more of the blame on that 4th down - on Langsdorf or TA?

 

I noticed a lot of people on Twitter saying 'don't blame Langsdorf because he didn't throw the ball.' While true, it's also a coaches job to put a QB (and the team) in a position to win the game. Did Langsdorf and the coaches put TA and the team in the right spot there to convert, while understanding the limitations TA has?

totally TA. The wide open receiver proves that langsdorf put Tommy in a great position. People can claim that DL needs to know his qb's strengths and weaknesses so he should've justhe ran the ball, but a 3 year starting qb for a power 5 school should have enough common sense to know game situation and that 4th and 1 means you don't need to and shouldn't go for a home run shot, especially when you have a wide open receiver a couple yards past the 1st down. Obviously TA would've still had to get it to carter accurately enough to catch, and carter in turn would've had to make the catch, but the coaches still put them in a position to make the play. Tommy didn't even look at the check down and stared down the fly fade the whole way.

But here's the thing....TA has been a 3-year starter and in that time has shown no consistency in being able to make those throws. It's not like him missing that throw was an anomaly. It's what Tommy does, and DL should recognize that. Now if Tommy were a freshman and hadn't shown such inconsistently I would feel better with the call, but DL is not playing to Tommy's strengths.

I understand but the biggest thing is that TA didn't even bother looking down at the check down, he just went straight for the low percentage home run ball. It's not like throw was just that bad. It was a decent throw to give the WR an opportunity to either go for the catch or try to I draw a pass interference. The DB just made a better play defensively. My point is as a 3 year starter Tommy should have enough common sense to know he shouldn't throw the home run ball and that he still had over 4 minutes with 3 timeouts, on 4th down. Know the other routes for the play and find someone else that perhaps isn't being covered like a blanket. Maybe we should've just run it, though, since Tommy is barely even able to decipher when to bite the bullet and throw the ball away, let alone find an open check down reciever.

 

I see what you're saying, but at what point do you put more blame on the coaches?

 

TA has lost every single game, or at least the vast majority of games, where he has had to throw more than 40 times.

 

I don't think it's as simple as "Tommy should have enough common sense." It's a coach's job to put his players in the best position to win. By your same reasoning, you could argue that Tom Brady and Tyrod Taylor should always be coached and put in similar positions to convert 4th and 1 because they should just have enough common sense. However, I think we'd both agree how a team might approach a 4th and 1 with Brady is much different than how the Bills would approach 4th and 1 with Taylor.

 

The same principles apply, here, imho.

 

Put him in a position to win like against Illinois when he was told to run the ball and threw it anyway an lost the game? Sometimes you can't fix stupid and I think we found that out against Iowa.

 

Don't call our players stupid.

[KazLong]

 

I learned, that it would be really nice if the Huskers installed a few gaint heat lamps for these god awful cold games. (just like a warming tent) Learned that coffee only makes me feel better for a few mins, also learned 50 people will line up for hot chocolate when you can get coffee pretty quick and it is hotter.

 

I regret just selling one of my tickets and going with the other.

 

I have a theory that Radar is someone from the TnT show, they were discussing today that there show is actively trolling 'certain' husker boards for lolz, for a while it sounds like. They discuss a lot of our fan theories and make fun of us almost every morning. Not saying it is our board but def trolling some husker boards, they talked openly about doing it today, to get material for the show. I believe they stated been doing it sense earlier this year...

 

Not sure which segment it was in if anyone is interested. I can try to find it tomorrow when at work if anyone is interested.

 

http://www.tntradioempire.com/AUDIO/podcast/

The women restroom in the south stadium has blowing heaters I just assumed the guys would have it as well

 

Negative. I was sitting in section 12 I think, or 17 had 2 sets of 2 tickets for both sections, which are end zone, however I have sat on the side lines and those restrooms seem warmer, maybe just the end zone restrooms are unheated... Thought about trying to get to the normal rest rooms under the guise of going to the Husker store over half time lol!

[74Hunter]

I have a theory that Radar is someone from the TnT show, they were discussing today that there show is actively trolling 'certain' husker boards for lolz, for a while it sounds like. They discuss a lot of our fan theories and make fun of us almost every morning. Not saying it is our board but def trolling some husker boards, they talked openly about doing it today, to get material for the show. I believe they stated been doing it sense earlier this year...

Huh......

 

Anywho, you listen to those Dbag burnouts?

 

Listening to that show drops your IQ about 40 points. I can't believe that the Husker sports network is affiliated with those two......ummm....."Eichorsts."