Jump to content


Cases of Election Fraud


Recommended Posts


11 hours ago, Redux said:

 

Why did they block out the windows during one of the recounts in I believe Detroit?

What does this have to do with the fact you gullibilly eat up everything a known pathological liar says without any doubt in your mind? And you think that makes everyone else lazy :facepalm: way to move the goalposts over to another state. I guess you don't want to talk about how much you trust a well documented liar anymore. 

  • Plus1 2
Link to comment
4 minutes ago, Nebfanatic said:

What does this have to do with the fact you gullibilly eat up everything a known pathological liar says without any doubt in your mind? And you think that makes everyone else lazy :facepalm: way to move the goalposts over to another state. I guess you don't want to talk about how much you trust a well documented liar anymore. 

 

Why did they block out the windows in Detroit?

Link to comment

1 hour ago, Redux said:

 

Why did they block out the windows in Detroit?

@BlitzFirst already provided you a link and answer to your question.  At this point anyone who is still yammering on about election fraud will be complicit in the death of American democracy, whether by sheer stupidity, willful ignorance, paranoid psychosis, or an actual wish to live under an autocrat.

 

You've been beating this dead horse about election fraud for days now but one thing is missing...one shred of evidence.  Present evidence or we'll have to assume your motives fit into one of the above and, whether you realize it or not, or whether you are ok with it or not, you're contributing to the loss of your own freedom

 

  • Plus1 5
Link to comment
1 hour ago, Redux said:

 

Why did they block out the windows in Detroit?

Someone already told you why. Are you going to believe the people who were actually there or a president who lies every time he opens his mouth? Why did you change the subject Redux? Can't make the field goal unless you move the goalposts huh? What's funny is you can't even make it then. 

  • Plus1 2
Link to comment

4 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

That’s possible too.  While It’s possible they are weak, they are not baseless by definition 

They are baseless if they have no basis in the law. Basically just filing suits that are guaranteed to fail over and over again because winning the lawsuits isn't the goal. There's an entire thread going over all of the examples of this.

Link to comment
6 minutes ago, RedDenver said:

They are baseless if they have no basis in the law. Basically just filing suits that are guaranteed to fail over and over again because winning the lawsuits isn't the goal. There's an entire thread going over all of the examples of this.

People collecting ballots in a park that we’re not allowed to in Wisconsin, which is against Wisconsin state law is following the law?  

  • Plus1 1
Link to comment
7 minutes ago, commando said:

it seems that the wisconsin supreme court disagrees with that take.   

The dissenters are correct that the arrangements for collecting ballots at these events did not comply with governing law. By statute, absentee ballots must be submitted to state election officials, not volunteer “poll-watchers” who are not agents of the state. Laches is not a convincing rationale for turning a blind eye to this violation of election law — and by invoking it, the majority hurts the cause of preventing a recurrence.
 

 

  • Plus1 1
Link to comment
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...