Jump to content

Trump Legal Troubles


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

6 hours ago, suh_fan93 said:
 

 

 

Oh hot dog!!!! Good thing he only stole millions from the American people in a tax fraud scheme! If he'd have stolen billions he might've gotten 6 months! 

 

But a poor kid steals 5 bucks out of a cash register can expect to get shot dead while running away or spend years in jail added to the system and their life destroyed. This country is so f'ed up! 

  • TBH 2
Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...

 

Another Trump loss.  He is so smart!!    Trump is an employment genius.   I don't know of any other person who has provide job security to so many lawyers, judges and judicial staff members.  

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-lawyer-hit-with-937-989-sanctions-in-clinton-case/ar-AA16xFaW?ocid=entnewsntp&cvid=08ff457fa54042bc8f52dd0f145ee72f

 

Quote

 

Former President Donald Trump and one of his top lawyers were ordered to pay almost $1 million in legal fees and costs to Hillary Clinton, her 2016 campaign and more than a dozen political operatives who he accused of a vast conspiracy to damage his reputation.  

The suit, dismissed last year as an improper political “manifesto,” is part of a long pattern of abuse of the courts by Trump and his lawyers and “should never have been brought,” US District Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks said in a ruling late Thursday in West Palm Beach, Florida.

“Its inadequacy as a legal claim was evident from the start,” the judge said. “No reasonable lawyer would have filed it. Intended for a political purpose, none of the counts of the amended complaint stated a cognizable legal claim.”

Trump, his lead attorney, Alina Habba, and her law firm were held jointly liable for $937,989. The sanctions were issued on behalf of 18 defendants who submitted a joint motion accusing Trump of knowingly filing a suit with bogus and unbelievable claims to dishonestly advance a political narrative.

 

The ruling is the latest legal setback for Trump, who was not deterred by his failed lawsuits challenging the result of the 2020 presidential election. 

Earlier this month, his lawyers barely escaped sanctions over their failed arguments against New York Attorney General Letitia James’s civil fraud suit against him and his company, which goes to trial in October. And a separate suit Trump filed against James in Florida was criticized last month by Middlebrooks, who denied his request for an injunction and said that case had “all the telltale signs of being both vexatious and frivolous.” Trump voluntarily dropped the suit Friday without saying why.

Habba didn’t respond to a message seeking comment. Trump is likely to appeal.

David Kendall, a lawyer for Clinton, said in a statement Friday that Trump’s lawsuit caused 31 defendants to spend money and effort “debunking phony legal claims.”

“As the court has now recognized, from the beginning this lawsuit was a political stunt that had no business in a court of law,” Kendall said. “It was a sham which unfairly absorbed the court’s time and energy better devoted to litigants with real claims.”

The ruling came hours after Habba appeared in New York state court to argue against dismissal of a $100 million lawsuit Trump filed against his niece Mary Trump and the New York Times over its award-winning 2018 story on the former president’s taxes. The judge overseeing that case Thursday repeatedly suggested the damages sought by Trump could be viewed as intimidation.

Middlebrooks, an appointee of former President Bill Clinton, said in his ruling in Trump’s Florida suit against Hillary Clinton that filing such lawsuits “undermines the rule of law, portrays judges as partisans, and diverts resources from those who have suffered actual legal harm.”

The judge rejected any notion that Trump’s lawyers were the only ones at fault.

“Mr. Trump is a prolific and sophisticated litigant who is repeatedly using the courts to seek revenge on political adversaries,” the judge said. “He is the mastermind of strategic abuse of the judicial process, and he cannot be seen as a litigant blindly following the advice of a lawyer.”

 

Repeated Grievances

Trump’s suit, filed in March, repeated many of his grievances over the FBI’s 2016 probe into whether his campaign was colluding with Russia to influence the election that year, alleging the entire investigation was the result of a Democratic-led conspiracy to undermine him. He named former Federal Bureau of Investigation Director James Comey, Clinton Campaign Chair John Podesta, British ex-spy Christopher Steele and many others.

In his ruling Thursday, Middlebrooks picked apart the details of the alleged conspiracy much as he did when he dismissed the case last year. For example, the judge said the claim that Comey conspired with Clinton to “maliciously prosecute” Trump was not backed by any details and is contradicted by the fact that Comey never initiated a probe of Trump. The judge also pointed to Comey’s reopening the investigation into Clinton’s emails days before the election, as clear evidence against a conspiracy.

“The implausible claim that Mr. Comey conspired with Ms. Clinton, given the impact of his announcements on her 2016 campaign, not only lacks substance but is categorically absurd,” the judge said. “This is a deliberate attempt to harass; to tell a story without regard to facts.”

The judge on Thursday blasted Trump’s lawyers for stacking the suit with details from the criminal complaints against former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann and Russian business analyst Igor Danchenko, who were charged by the US Justice Department special counsel investigating the FBI’s handling of the Trump-Russia probe. The allegations against both men were seized upon by Trump and his allies as evidence that Democrats and their Justice Department allies conspired to undermine Trump starting in 2015. While the probe found many faults with the FBI probe, both cases failed.

 

Acquitted

“A criminal indictment should be no more than the starting point for a lawyer’s good faith pre-filing investigation,” the judge wrote. “The danger of overreliance has been demonstrated here, in light of the acquittals of Mr. Sussmann and Mr. Danchenko.”

The judge in November ordered Habba and another lawyer to pay $50,000 to the court and $16,274 in legal fees and costs to one of the defendants, Democratic political operative Charles Dolan, who was involved in Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and filed his own motion for sanctions.

The case is Trump v. Clinton, 22-cv-14102, US District Court, Southern District of Florida.

 

 

  • Plus1 1
  • Thanks 2
  • Oh Yeah! 1
Link to comment

20 minutes ago, TGHusker said:

 

Another Trump loss.  He is so smart!!    Trump is an employment genius.   I don't know of any other person who has provide job security to so many lawyers, judges and judicial staff members.  

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-lawyer-hit-with-937-989-sanctions-in-clinton-case/ar-AA16xFaW?ocid=entnewsntp&cvid=08ff457fa54042bc8f52dd0f145ee72f

 

 

So who is responsible for theat $1mm bill he just handed down?  Trump or the law firm who represented him?

Link to comment
29 minutes ago, commando said:

the cult will donate the funds.  

In the sanction handed down, the judge specifically talks about how these lawsuits have become more about fund raising and not about seeking legitimate legal relief. Gives an example of the ask as well.

Link to comment

2 hours ago, TGHusker said:

 

Another Trump loss.  He is so smart!!    Trump is an employment genius.   I don't know of any other person who has provide job security to so many lawyers, judges and judicial staff members.  

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-lawyer-hit-with-937-989-sanctions-in-clinton-case/ar-AA16xFaW?ocid=entnewsntp&cvid=08ff457fa54042bc8f52dd0f145ee72f

 

 

 

 

kevin-the-office.gif

Link to comment

no one told me i was breaking the law!

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-blames-others-on-his-notorious-georgia-call-for-not-hanging-up-on-him-as-fulton-county-decision-nears/ar-AA16I3MZ?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=62e23ff2c51c4d41b301602c6664f18c

 

“[H]ow come not one person said, while on the call, that I acted inappropriately, or made a statement of protest at what I said, & then slammed down the phone[?]” asked the ex-president. “Not one, even with so many opposing people, lawyers, and others on the line. NO ADMONISHMENT at all.”

Link to comment
11 minutes ago, commando said:

no one told me i was breaking the law!

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-blames-others-on-his-notorious-georgia-call-for-not-hanging-up-on-him-as-fulton-county-decision-nears/ar-AA16I3MZ?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=62e23ff2c51c4d41b301602c6664f18c

 

“[H]ow come not one person said, while on the call, that I acted inappropriately, or made a statement of protest at what I said, & then slammed down the phone[?]” asked the ex-president. “Not one, even with so many opposing people, lawyers, and others on the line. NO ADMONISHMENT at all.”

That's laughable when you consider what his reaction to that would have been.

 

Remember....he's big on people being loyal to HIM.  He's the greatest in the world.  He's even smarter than the Generals.  If someone would have done that, he would have never listened to them.  There were people around him that would tell him something wasn't right and he wouldn't listen to them.

  • Plus1 1
Link to comment
37 minutes ago, commando said:

no one told me i was breaking the law!

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-blames-others-on-his-notorious-georgia-call-for-not-hanging-up-on-him-as-fulton-county-decision-nears/ar-AA16I3MZ?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=62e23ff2c51c4d41b301602c6664f18c

 

“[H]ow come not one person said, while on the call, that I acted inappropriately, or made a statement of protest at what I said, & then slammed down the phone[?]” asked the ex-president. “Not one, even with so many opposing people, lawyers, and others on the line. NO ADMONISHMENT at all.”

How delusional must one be to state this?   But perhaps it wasn't delusional. 

Perhaps it was outright criminal.  A thought-out plan to overthrow an election under the guise of the false claim of election fraud.    I do believe it was the later.  

Quote

My phone call to the Secretary of State of Georgia, and a second call which the Marxists, Communists, Racists, and RINOS don’t even want to talk about, were “PERFECT” calls. Many people, including lawyers for both sides, were knowingly on the line. I was protesting a RIGGED & STOLEN Election, which evidence proves it was,” claimed the former president.

 

Link to comment
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...