Archy1221 Posted March 25, 2022 Share Posted March 25, 2022 3 hours ago, BigRedBuster said: That made him get an infection? Is there an ICD10 code for that? 1 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted March 25, 2022 Share Posted March 25, 2022 Question. Does the party of law and order mean they give our law enforcement something to do? 4 Link to comment
B.B. Hemingway Posted March 25, 2022 Share Posted March 25, 2022 1 hour ago, Scarlet said: Yeah the wife of a supreme court justice is texting the Chief of Staff of the POTUS supporting the overthrow of our form of government but "pffffft what's the big deal?" Myopia View your table for four is ready That’s an incredibly dramatic breakdown of the texts in that CBS news video. Maybe there’s more to it. She seems to think Biden stole the election, but there didn’t appear to be any attempt to strategize, etc. It’s definitely a bad look all involved, no doubt there. 4 3 Link to comment
Scarlet Posted March 25, 2022 Share Posted March 25, 2022 More on why this matters and that Judge Thomas's non-recusal and ruling to uphold Trump's executive privilege claims may be more indepth then we know. Quote Justice Thomas’ failed attempt to uphold Trump’s (and therefore Meadows’) insanely broad privilege claims might have had the effect of making it clear that Meadows had destroyed privileged communications that would be covered by the ongoing January 6 grand jury investigation. It’s not just embarrassing texts involving his spouse that Justice Thomas could have covered up with his participation in that decision. It is also potential criminal obstruction exposure because Meadows replaced his phone. Particularly given the big gap in texts in what Meadows turned over between November 24 and January 10, those might be far more important than the crazypants things Ginni said. 3 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted March 25, 2022 Share Posted March 25, 2022 49 minutes ago, Archy1221 said: That made him get an infection? Is there an ICD10 code for that? Yep, it's a new strain. It's called the Oh f#&% virus. 1 Link to comment
VectorVictor Posted March 25, 2022 Share Posted March 25, 2022 1 hour ago, suh_fan93 said: Lol at the 3 Stooges What's pathetically hypocritical is that Mitch voted for Ketanji Brown Jackson for her Federal appointment. Also, I'm sure most of the GOP only see Ketanji Brown Jackson as 3/5ths of a judge anyway. 3 4 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted March 25, 2022 Share Posted March 25, 2022 34 minutes ago, VectorVictor said: What's pathetically hypocritical is that Mitch voted for Ketanji Brown Jackson for her Federal appointment. Also, I'm sure most of the GOP only see Ketanji Brown Jackson as 3/5ths of a judge anyway. I’m quite sure you will be looking into all the Dems who voted against Kav Gorsuch and Barrett and make the same claim as in your first paragraph. Looking forward to that post. 1 4 1 Link to comment
ZRod Posted March 25, 2022 Share Posted March 25, 2022 1 hour ago, Archy1221 said: I’m quite sure you will be looking into all the Dems who voted against Kav Gorsuch and Barrett and make the same claim as in your first paragraph. Looking forward to that post. Did they hold up a supreme court nomination for a bulls#!t reason and then do a complete 180 to push a Justice throught when it was their party's nomination? McConnel is absolute bottom of the barrel scum as far as politicians go. He's been on the wrong side of history far too often. I'm not sure why you would even insinuate a defense for him. 4 4 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted March 25, 2022 Share Posted March 25, 2022 I've been with him several times and I have never come away with a good feeling. Never could put my finger on why. Just something about him rubbed me the wrong way. 2 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted March 25, 2022 Share Posted March 25, 2022 1 hour ago, ZRod said: 2 hours ago, Archy1221 said: Did they hold up a supreme court nomination for a bulls#!t reason and then do a complete 180 to push a Justice throught when it was their party's nomination? No because they weren’t in charge. Harry and Chuck would have done the exact same thing so let’s not get all Pius here about those folks. 1 hour ago, ZRod said: McConnel is absolute bottom of the barrel scum as far as politicians go. He's been on the wrong side of history far too often. I'm not sure why you would even insinuate a defense for him. That’s strictly a matter of opinion. If you want to voice your opinion on specific historical matters please share 2 1 Link to comment
NebraskaHarry Posted March 25, 2022 Share Posted March 25, 2022 Hunter Biden, the new Republican boogeyman. Doesnt replace Hillary of course. Just another boogeyman to fall back on when things are slow for them. 4 Link to comment
nic Posted March 25, 2022 Share Posted March 25, 2022 2 hours ago, ZRod said: Did they hold up a supreme court nomination for a bulls#!t reason and then do a complete 180 to push a Justice throught when it was their party's nomination? McConnel is absolute bottom of the barrel scum as far as politicians go. He's been on the wrong side of history far too often. I'm not sure why you would even insinuate a defense for him. Yup the did. Elections have consequences. And all politicians are scum. Very few exceptions. 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts