BigRedBuster Posted January 4, 2021 Share Posted January 4, 2021 2 minutes ago, Archy1221 said: you never disagreed with Nunes memo in your rant. Just hated that he did it and was proven correct. I didn't, because I'm not going to rehash the entire issue again. I'll say it again. it's pathetic and very telling that Republicans view him as a hero. Carry on that party torch. It looks good in your hands. It's funny how we are seeing all this type of thing play out again with his post election antics with even more behind the scenes access like with the tape that was released yesterday. BUT....hey....back then, Trump was the hero so everyone must protect him. Link to comment
knapplc Posted January 4, 2021 Author Share Posted January 4, 2021 A little research on the nunes memo Even If You Take the Nunes Memo Seriously, It Makes No Sense The Democratic rebuttal to the Nunes memo tears it apart The Nunes memo is out. It’s a joke and a sham. Nunes Memo Drops & Flops 1 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted January 4, 2021 Share Posted January 4, 2021 1 minute ago, BigRedBuster said: 3 minutes ago, Archy1221 said: I didn't, because I'm not going to rehash the entire issue again. I'll say it again. it's pathetic and very telling that Republicans view him as a hero. You didn’t because you know you are wrong and can’t seem to just admit it and move on. It is been established as fact many many times. 1 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted January 4, 2021 Share Posted January 4, 2021 1 minute ago, knapplc said: A little research on the nunes memo Even If You Take the Nunes Memo Seriously, It Makes No Sense The Democratic rebuttal to the Nunes memo tears it apart The Nunes memo is out. It’s a joke and a sham. Nunes Memo Drops & Flops At some point put a link to an article from late 2019 or 2020 when more facts became public and proved him correct. the narrative you present has been proven incorrect, yet you still run with it. The question is Why? 1 Link to comment
RedDenver Posted January 4, 2021 Share Posted January 4, 2021 1 minute ago, Archy1221 said: You didn’t because you know you are wrong and can’t seem to just admit it and move on. It is been established as fact many many times. 1 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 4, 2021 Share Posted January 4, 2021 Just now, Archy1221 said: At some point put a link to an article from late 2019 or 2020 when more facts became public and proved him correct. the narrative you present has been proven incorrect, yet you still run with it. The question is Why? All heil the party!!!! Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted January 4, 2021 Share Posted January 4, 2021 Just now, BigRedBuster said: All heil the party!!!! can’t disagree so go with a Hitler reference. Nice one. You should be so proud. 1 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 4, 2021 Share Posted January 4, 2021 2 minutes ago, Archy1221 said: can’t disagree so go with a Hitler reference. Nice one. You should be so proud. It seems to be fitting more and more with how someone expects loyalty to him and the party. Link to comment
knapplc Posted January 4, 2021 Author Share Posted January 4, 2021 It's a stretch, but is suing fake internet cows what trump considers a "meritorious contribution to... cultural... endeavors" ? 2 Link to comment
Decoy73 Posted January 4, 2021 Share Posted January 4, 2021 19 minutes ago, Archy1221 said: Neither did Devin or Jim. What we know about the FISA abuse of because of Nunes and in spite of Schiff. Nunes sent his former aid to Ukraine to dig up dirt on Biden and then refused to answer questions about it from his fellow House Colleagues. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/new-evidence-shows-nunes-aide-communicated-parnas-ukraine-n1118251 What about dear Devin's phone calls from Lev Parnas? https://www.vox.com/2019/12/9/21002572/devin-nunes-lev-parnas-maria-bartiromo-interview-phone-calls Come on. At least acknowledge that Nunes is dirty. 3 Link to comment
knapplc Posted January 4, 2021 Author Share Posted January 4, 2021 Mr. nunes the litigant is... not so successful. Maybe his great contribution to society is laughably stupid lawsuits? Judge Tosses Out Rep. Nunes' Lawsuit Against Washington Post Devin Nunes’ lawsuit against Trump research firm dismissed by Virginia judge Rep. Devin Nunes' Libel Case Against Hearst Thrown Out by Trump Appointee Devin Nunes Lawsuit Against Twitter Over Fake Cow Thrown Out by Judge Devin Nunes’s Weird Lawsuit Against Ryan Lizza Just Got Soundly Dismissed It's funny because every one of these articles features a version of this picture where nunes looks like he was just forced to muck the stalls on his family farm. Oh... wait. There is no farm. #fakefarmer 1 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted January 4, 2021 Share Posted January 4, 2021 18 minutes ago, Decoy73 said: Nunes sent his former aid to Ukraine to dig up dirt on Biden and then refused to answer questions about it from his fellow House Colleagues. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/new-evidence-shows-nunes-aide-communicated-parnas-ukraine-n1118251 What about dear Devin's phone calls from Lev Parnas? https://www.vox.com/2019/12/9/21002572/devin-nunes-lev-parnas-maria-bartiromo-interview-phone-calls Come on. At least acknowledge that Nunes is dirty. Is anyone going to acknowledge that his memo Is what got the ball rolling in highlighting FISA abuse? Or do we just not care about FISA abuse? Nunes is probably as dirty as Schiff. I could agree to that. 1 Link to comment
knapplc Posted January 4, 2021 Author Share Posted January 4, 2021 They wouldn't even do it in front of witnesses. Cowards gonna cower. 3 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 4, 2021 Share Posted January 4, 2021 2 hours ago, Archy1221 said: Or do we just not care about FISA abuse? If you really cared about abuses of power, you wouldn't support Trump. But...... 2 Link to comment
Decoy73 Posted January 4, 2021 Share Posted January 4, 2021 2 hours ago, Archy1221 said: Is anyone going to acknowledge that his memo Is what got the ball rolling in highlighting FISA abuse? Or do we just not care about FISA abuse? Nunes is probably as dirty as Schiff. I could agree to that. You couldn’t do it without the “yeah, but “ on Adam Schiff. I presented credible evidence that Nunes has had nefarious intentions, in which he refused to answer to, but rather threaten frivolous lawsuits. Can you do the same for Schiff? And I stress “credible “. Link to comment
Recommended Posts