The Republican Utopia

[Archy1221]

15 hours ago, RedDenver said:

I clicked on the first study listed on the table (https://c19hcq.com/gautretjaa.html)

 

The second study (https://c19hcq.com/huangjmcb.html) listed had a whopping 22 patients.

The third study (https://c19hcq.com/esper.html) wasn't even randomized.

 

The National Institute of Health (NIH) has analyzed a number of these studies and none of them are conclusive and many have questionable methodologies: https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/tables/table-2b/

 

Here's what theNIH has to say about HCQ as a covid treatment:

 

And here's the World Health Organization (WHO):

 

But I'm sure that website probably knows better.

Welp the NIH made no statements about a HCQ cocktail and I find that interesting that an org such as NIH wouldn’t make a statement on it considering the vast amounts of II studies showing it’s benefits 
 

As far as WHO goes, they have as much credibility on anything Covid as China saying Covid came from a US military base.

[Archy1221]

16 hours ago, RedDenver said:

I clicked on the first study listed on the table (https://c19hcq.com/gautretjaa.html)

 

The second study (https://c19hcq.com/huangjmcb.html) listed had a whopping 22 patients.

The third study (https://c19hcq.com/esper.html) wasn't even randomized.

 

The National Institute of Health (NIH) has analyzed a number of these studies and none of them are conclusive and many have questionable methodologies: https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/tables/table-2b/

 

Here's what theNIH has to say about HCQ as a covid treatment:

 

And here's the World Health Organization (WHO):

 

But I'm sure that website probably knows better.

You sent me a study to secure your position that had 5 times as many patients in one cohort vs the other that the own study authors said was probably bad and you complain about recruitment in other studies

 

Why did you stop after three?  I sent you the large list?  

16 hours ago, knapplc said:

 

I dozens of dogs dare you.

 

Dozens for the dozens of people who died taking trump's boondoggle before the study was cut short.

 

Not to mention the well-publicized man and his wife who died last spring after trump started pushing it.

 

 

When do you share the story of the two dead people?

[commando]

4 hours ago, Archy1221 said:

 

As far as WHO goes, they have as much credibility on anything Covid as China saying Covid came from a US military base.

this might be the single most moronic thing anyone  has posted here.   grats i guess.   

[Archy1221]

10 minutes ago, commando said:

this might be the single most moronic thing anyone  has posted here.   grats i guess.   

You must not have followed the WHO’s actions this past 16 months.  Grat’s I guess

[RedDenver]

Just now, Archy1221 said:

You must not have followed the WHO’s actions this past 16 months.  Grat’s I guess

But random website collecting questionable research and press release of an unreviewed study are up to Archy's standards I guess.

[commando]

11 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

You must not have followed the WHO’s actions this past 16 months.  Grat’s I guess

you and google search know more than the WHO?

[Archy1221]

4 minutes ago, commando said:

you and google search know more than the WHO?

I don’t, but I would put my money on front line doctors for treatment algorithms rather than WHO.  

[Archy1221]

16 minutes ago, RedDenver said:

But random website collecting questionable research and press release of an unreviewed study are up to Archy's standards I guess.

But your random studies with N’s that the researchers say are bad are up to anyone’s standards?  And randomly quoting WHO which doesn’t even address the algorithm in question they and using that to push forward your position is up to par I guess??  

[commando]

5 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

I don’t, but I would put my money on front line doctors for treatment algorithms rather than WHO.  

your lack of faith in science is noted.   

[Archy1221]

15 minutes ago, commando said:

your lack of faith in science is noted.   

Your understanding of nothing is noted.  Calling a faith in front line doctors as anti-science is anti-smart and duly noted

[commando]

16 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

Your understanding of nothing is noted.  Calling a faith in front line doctors as anti-science is anti-smart and duly noted

lol.    you deny  an organization that represents medicine all over the world in favor of a front line doc that has the same opinion as  the opinion that your party favors

[Archy1221]

3 hours ago, commando said:

lol.    you deny  an organization that represents medicine all over the world in favor of a front line doc that has the same opinion as  the opinion that your party favors

‘A front line doc’?  If you could point me to where I distinguished to 1 front line doc that would be appreciated.   Or is this more disingenuous posting by you once again. 

[BigRedBuster]

 

[Scarlet]

Science is mean.  It points out things like climate change, pie in the sky treatments that don't work, evolution, and data supporting that voter fraud is not a significant issue.  It develops vaccines that can save lives.  Plus scientists have those wispy liberal beards.  Hate it.

[Archy1221]

23 hours ago, commando said:

lol.    you deny  an organization that represents medicine all over the world in favor of a front line doc that has the same opinion as  the opinion that your party favors

Do I ever get you to re-post where I said I follow 1 front lone doctor like you insinuate?  It’s a bold claim you made, just waiting for the evidence to prove it once again.  

On 7/15/2021 at 5:58 PM, knapplc said:

 

I dozens of dogs dare you.

 

Dozens for the dozens of people who died taking trump's boondoggle before the study was cut short.

 

Not to mention the well-publicized man and his wife who died last spring after trump started pushing it.

 

 

Just a friendly reminder we are all still

waiting for the story you promised us.