Jump to content


The Environment


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

what could go wrong?  roads that glow in the dark sound like fun

 

https://www.wftv.com/news/local/florida-lawmakers-pass-bill-allowing-radioactive-material-be-built-into-florida-roads/GOCH74D4A5C2VAJDFKQQEPCVK4/

 

The bill passed by legislators permits the use of toxic phosphogypsum in “demonstration” road projects in Florida. Critics said this is the first step in a phosphate industry push to eventually use the waste in roads nationwide.

The Environmental Protection Agency prohibits using the toxic phosphate waste in roadway construction because it poses an unacceptable risk to road construction workers, public health and the environment.

 
Link to comment
9 hours ago, commando said:

what could go wrong?  roads that glow in the dark sound like fun

 

https://www.wftv.com/news/local/florida-lawmakers-pass-bill-allowing-radioactive-material-be-built-into-florida-roads/GOCH74D4A5C2VAJDFKQQEPCVK4/

 

The bill passed by legislators permits the use of toxic phosphogypsum in “demonstration” road projects in Florida. Critics said this is the first step in a phosphate industry push to eventually use the waste in roads nationwide.

The Environmental Protection Agency prohibits using the toxic phosphate waste in roadway construction because it poses an unacceptable risk to road construction workers, public health and the environment.

 

Get cancer to own the libs!

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...
1 hour ago, RedDenver said:

Why Some People Are Susceptible to Climate Change Denial

 

TL;DR All-or-nothing thinking makes it easy to refute scientifically sound conclusions

From a scientific standpoint, these claims of disproof are absurd. Fluctuations in the weather don’t refute clear long-term trends in the climate.
 

what constitutes a “long-term trend” in your mind?  5yrs? 10yrs? 100yrs? 1000yrs, 10,000yrs? 

 

  • Plus1 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment

1 hour ago, Archy1221 said:

From a scientific standpoint, these claims of disproof are absurd. Fluctuations in the weather don’t refute clear long-term trends in the climate.
 

what constitutes a “long-term trend” in your mind?  5yrs? 10yrs? 100yrs? 1000yrs, 10,000yrs? 

 

 

3 hours ago, RedDenver said:

 

All-or-nothing thinking makes it easy to refute scientifically sound conclusions

 

  • Haha 2
  • Oh Yeah! 1
Link to comment
1 hour ago, Archy1221 said:

Ok, I’ll ask you.   What constitutes a long term trend?  Who defines how long the time period for the trend is?  

My answer to that has absolutely no bearing on the fact that you do not believe climate change due to man made causes is actually a thing. You’ve been very clear that science has got it all wrong and all we are experiencing is normal climate variation. Does it really matter if long term is 10 years or 1,000 years?
 

Your attitude on everything like this is deny deny deny, until you no longer can and then obfuscate and move the goalposts. If you’re still able to deny the science of climate change, nobody’s gonna change your mind and you’ll continue to be part of the problem and not the solution. I’ve already wasted more words on you than is worthwhile.

  • Plus1 7
  • TBH 2
Link to comment
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...