commando Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 10 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said: it isn't classified now...but if bolton is called to testify it will become classified? isn't that convenient. and also reeks of obstruction Link to comment
Decoy73 Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 Apparently his book will be out before the election, so we’ll still find out What Bolton knows before voting. Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 What a time to be alive. 2 Link to comment
funhusker Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 47 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said: What a time to be alive. Can the house hold more hearings and add to/create new articles of impeachment? Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 8 minutes ago, funhusker said: Can the house hold more hearings and add to/create new articles of impeachment? Yes Link to comment
funhusker Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 9 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said: Yes Then I don’t understand why they aren’t doing it right now. Especially with the Senate him-hawing over new witnesses. Just tell the Senate, “fine! If you want us to keep digging during election year, we will! 1 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 Just now, funhusker said: Then I don’t understand why they aren’t doing it right now. Especially with the Senate him-hawing over new witnesses. Just tell the Senate, “fine! If you want us to keep digging during election year, we will! Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 35 minutes ago, funhusker said: Then I don’t understand why they aren’t doing it right now. Especially with the Senate him-hawing over new witnesses. Just tell the Senate, “fine! If you want us to keep digging during election year, we will! Could be because a lot of the people on the House judiciary committee are involved in the Senate trial. Link to comment
Notre Dame Joe Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 On 1/19/2020 at 5:08 PM, ZRod said: I know I'll get grief for this, but do we really need to hold someone to their words from 45 years ago? We all grow and change with age. Is this a position he holds to this day? https://imgur.com/6EWkTPI 1 Link to comment
QMany Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 Not including any context or the rest of the essay this quote is pulled from is very on-brand. 1 Link to comment
ZRod Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 5 hours ago, Notre Dame Joe said: https://imgur.com/6EWkTPI There's no way you would have actually read that essay, is there? You just wanted to be a troll, and post something almost entirely unrelated, right? 1 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 9 hours ago, funhusker said: Then I don’t understand why they aren’t doing it right now. Especially with the Senate him-hawing over new witnesses. Just tell the Senate, “fine! If you want us to keep digging during election year, we will! Link to comment
Moiraine Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 29 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said: If they dismiss it that way, the House will have no choice but to keep impeaching. The Democrats can’t let the House and Senate be destroyed that easily. 2 Link to comment
commando Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 keep investigating but don't impeach. just let the facts drip drip drip into the pubic domain and campaign against a crooked senate that obstructs justice. the campaign might be more strategic to let the senate convict itself and see if it can't be turned. 2 Link to comment
Recommended Posts