QMany Posted February 5, 2020 Share Posted February 5, 2020 The first BIPARTISAN impeachment removal ever. Link to comment
teachercd Posted February 5, 2020 Share Posted February 5, 2020 2 minutes ago, FrantzHardySwag said: Wow, that took some stones. Respect, Senator Romney. Ohhh, is Mitt going to make a move and run? Link to comment
QMany Posted February 5, 2020 Share Posted February 5, 2020 2 minutes ago, teachercd said: Ohhh, is Mitt going to make a move and run? Nah, the cult would swallow him hole. But he will live and die with his integrity when it comes to this decision. History will not look as kindly upon Sasse, McConnell, et al. 3 Link to comment
teachercd Posted February 5, 2020 Share Posted February 5, 2020 Just now, QMany said: Nah, the cult would swallow him hole. But he will live and die with his integrity when it comes to this decision. I would not mind if he ran. He isn't as stiff and robot like anymore. 1 Link to comment
Notre Dame Joe Posted February 5, 2020 Share Posted February 5, 2020 4 hours ago, Nebfanatic said: So when the House impeaches again will we make another thread or just stuff it all in here? You should just call it the Current Coup Curiosity and have everything: electoral college-emoluments-25th Amd-Russian Collusion etc etc in one easy to find sticky. 1 Link to comment
knapplc Posted February 5, 2020 Author Share Posted February 5, 2020 4 minutes ago, QMany said: Worth watching! When did he give this interview? Because I'm stunned Fox didn't tell Trump this was coming. Link to comment
Notre Dame Joe Posted February 5, 2020 Share Posted February 5, 2020 1 hour ago, BigRedBuster said: Yes, he did. There was one witness that was subpoenaed and the WH took them to court to stop it. I believe Bolton was subpoenaed and they were told they will got to court for that too and that's when the Dems backed off and decided it was going to take too long going through courts. So...basically, the WH has said, "You need to go to court to enforce your subpoenas". Then, in court they argued "The house Democrats are not legally able to go to court to enforce their subpoenas". It wasn't Bolton, it was for some guy named Charles Kupperman, and the Ds withdrew it likely because they knew they'd lose. 1 Link to comment
QMany Posted February 5, 2020 Share Posted February 5, 2020 4 minutes ago, knapplc said: When did he give this interview? Because I'm stunned Fox didn't tell Trump this was coming. Chris Wallace seems fed up with Fox state propaganda. Link to comment
Nebfanatic Posted February 5, 2020 Share Posted February 5, 2020 11 minutes ago, Notre Dame Joe said: It wasn't Bolton, it was for some guy named Charles Kupperman, and the Ds withdrew it likely because they knew they'd lose. Wrong. They withdrew it because it would have taken a year or more. The House asked to be bound by the decision in the McGahn case and Kuppermans lawyer refused. Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted February 5, 2020 Share Posted February 5, 2020 29 minutes ago, Notre Dame Joe said: It wasn't Bolton, it was for some guy named Charles Kupperman, and the Ds withdrew it likely because they knew they'd lose. So...I'm happy that you know that the reason none of these people testified in the House was because the WH fought so hard to keep them quiet. Hmmm....wonder why. Link to comment
QMany Posted February 5, 2020 Share Posted February 5, 2020 Bolton's testimony efforts are briefed in the Intelligence Committee's December Report, p. 232: Quote Ambassador John Bolton, Former National Security Advisor On October 30, the Committees sent a letter to the personal attorney of Ambassador John Bolton, the former National Security Advisor to President Trump, seeking his appearance at a deposition on November 7.223 Later that day, Ambassador Bolton’s personal attorney sent an email to Committee staff stating, “As you no doubt have anticipated, Ambassador Bolton is not willing to appear voluntarily.”224 On November 7, Ambassador Bolton did not appear for the scheduled deposition. On November 8, Ambassador Bolton’s personal attorney sent a letter to Douglas Letter, the General Counsel of the House of Representatives, suggesting that, if Ambassador Bolton were subpoenaed, he would file a lawsuit and would comply with the subpoena only if ordered to do so by the court. He referenced a lawsuit filed by another former official, Dr. Charles Kupperman, represented by the same attorney, and stated: "As I emphasized in my previous responses to letters from the House Chairs, Dr. Kupperman stands ready, as does Ambassador Bolton, to testify if the Judiciary resolves the conflict in favor of the Legislative Branch’s position respecting such testimony."225 To date, Ambassador Bolton has not changed his position or come forward to testify.226 In early January, Bolton agreed to testify before the Senate if subpoenaed. 1 Link to comment
commando Posted February 5, 2020 Share Posted February 5, 2020 wondering if mitt romney can be kicked out of the republican party. 1 Link to comment
QMany Posted February 5, 2020 Share Posted February 5, 2020 2 minutes ago, commando said: wondering if mitt romney can be kicked out of the republican party. The snowflakes are already trying. 3 Link to comment
Recommended Posts