Jump to content

The First Trump Impeachment Thread


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Notre Dame Joe said:

You think there are incriminating redactions that have yet to be leaked by the other 24 people who witnessed the call?

 

It was stupid then and it would be stupid now.  And stupidest is that Congress hasn't banned the practice until POTUS is out of office.

Congress should ban a President testifying under oath? That is a strange position to hold. The President isn't above the law

  • Plus1 5
Link to post

  • Replies 3.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

You have long ago proven yourself to be intellectually dishonest and resistant to facts and reason.

Interesting thing about this.     Shokin was widely viewed as a corrupt prosecutor by almost all of our allies.  It was widely known within our our foreign policy team that he actually neede

You would invoke Alan Dershowitz to defend Donald Trump.  He defended Epstein and procured his sweetheart deal that allowed him to continue raping children. Epstein pled the 5th when as

Posted Images

3 hours ago, Notre Dame Joe said:

You think there are incriminating redactions that have yet to be leaked by the other 24 people who witnessed the call?

Why was it left out?

 

3 hours ago, Notre Dame Joe said:

was stupid then and it would be stupid now.  And stupidest is that Congress hasn't banned the practice until POTUS is out of office.

Trump stood on stage and told Hillary he would throw her in prison. Republicans cheered. 
 

You’re telling me that if she had won, Republicans wouldn’t have been be demanding she testify if she were being impeached?  
 

You know that if we would be going through this exact same process, Republicans would be demanding it, right?

  • Plus1 2
Link to post
1 hour ago, Notre Dame Joe said:

You think there are incriminating redactions that have yet to be leaked by the other 24 people who witnessed the call?

 

It was stupid then and it would be stupid now.  And stupidest is that Congress hasn't banned the practice until POTUS is out of office.

donald could tell us all the truth and cut through the BS if he would testify.   it was not fair that he couldn't testify to congress....he should demand to testify in the senate.

Link to post

If you didn't have time to listen or do better reading, a great thread on the contents of the Fruman/Parnas tape. It is very long so be prepared for that. Very interesting at multiple points not just the Yovanovitch comments

 

 

 

 

  • Plus1 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post

5 hours ago, BigRedBuster said:

Why was it left out?

 

Trump stood on stage and told Hillary he would throw her in prison. Republicans cheered. 
 

You’re telling me that if she had won, Republicans wouldn’t have been be demanding she testify if she were being impeached?  
 

You know that if we would be going through this exact same process, Republicans would be demanding it, right?

 

#1 gets to the ridiculousness of NDJ's antics in here.  His goal is to bob and weave only to and from areas where he can shoehorn in talking points that feebly try to make Trump seem like the victim.


To #2... of course they would. And he'd be right there with them. Because he's squarely in their base and his opinions will change to match theirs. His arguments here are in bad faith explicitly because they're solely to excuse Trump's behavior; he would not offer them up if the shoe was on the other foot.

Link to post

7 hours ago, BigRedBuster said:

Why was it left out?

 

Trump stood on stage and told Hillary he would throw her in prison. Republicans cheered. 
 

You’re telling me that if she had won, Republicans wouldn’t have been be demanding she testify if she were being impeached?  
 

You know that if we would be going through this exact same process, Republicans would be demanding it, right?

 

20 minutes ago, Danny Bateman said:

 

#1 gets to the ridiculousness of NDJ's antics in here.  His goal is to bob and weave only to and from areas where he can shoehorn in talking points that feebly try to make Trump seem like the victim.


To #2... of course they would. And he'd be right there with them. Because he's squarely in their base and his opinions will change to match theirs. His arguments here are in bad faith explicitly because they're solely to excuse Trump's behavior; he would not offer them up if the shoe was on the other foot.

I've been quite consistent and non-partisan on the Impeachment of Bill Clinton.  He committed cut and dry crimes that could have been addressed, or not, after he left office.  I don't recall any oddly blue Huskers explaining why Clinton should've been out. 

 

@BigRedBuster  The reason Dersh had his book out before this happened was he presumed the Rs would try to impeach President Hilary R Clinton on whatever charges.  And if they tried to masquerade ticky tacky ethics violations (aka HRC's normal way of doing business)as HCOM I'd oppose it too. 

Link to post
12 minutes ago, Notre Dame Joe said:

 

I've been quite consistent and non-partisan on the Impeachment of Bill Clinton.  He committed cut and dry crimes that could have been addressed, or not, after he left office.  I don't recall any oddly blue Huskers explaining why Clinton should've been out. 

 

@BigRedBuster  The reason Dersh had his book out before this happened was he presumed the Rs would try to impeach President Hilary R Clinton on whatever charges.  And if they tried to masquerade ticky tacky ethics violations (aka HRC's normal way of doing business)as HCOM I'd oppose it too. 

Give me a break. If Hillary did what Trump did you would be screaming bloody murder 

 

 

 

Trump is scared 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Plus1 1
Link to post
59 minutes ago, Nebfanatic said:

Give me a break. If Hillary did what Trump did you would be screaming bloody murder 

 

 

 

Trump is scared 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is exactly why no one in Trumpworld would dream of letting him testify. So they just let him frantically try to retcon away his guilt on Twitter while they nervously watch on.

 

It would be an utter disaster if he ever had to sit down and answer actual questions. Because he is a habitual liar who thinks the law doesn't apply to him.

  • Plus1 1
Link to post
1 hour ago, Notre Dame Joe said:

 

I've been quite consistent and non-partisan on the Impeachment of Bill Clinton.  He committed cut and dry crimes that could have been addressed, or not, after he left office.

 

See, even here. Bill Clinton lied and thus perjured himself. Which you call a crime. But apparently that's a crime for him (a Democrat) that should have been addressed, but not one for Trump (a Republican), who lies every day with impunity, or any of the handful of his goons who've perjured themselves during testimony to Congress. You're displaying your biases clear as day.

 

1 hour ago, Notre Dame Joe said:

And if they tried to masquerade ticky tacky ethics violations (aka HRC's normal way of doing business)as HCOM I'd oppose it too. 

 

giphy.gif

  • Plus1 3
Link to post
7 hours ago, Notre Dame Joe said:

 

@BigRedBuster  The reason Dersh had his book out before this happened was he presumed the Rs would try to impeach President Hilary R Clinton on whatever charges.  And if they tried to masquerade ticky tacky ethics violations (aka HRC's normal way of doing business)as HCOM I'd oppose it too

:laughpound

 

I envision a change of attitude akin to what happened to Mitch and Lindsey. 
 

you have said nothing on here that leads me to believe you in this post. 
 

Do you support Bolton testifying?

 

 

Link to post
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.






×
×
  • Create New...