commando Posted January 19, 2020 Share Posted January 19, 2020 he also argued that the statutory rape age should be lowered to 15 1 Link to comment
teachercd Posted January 19, 2020 Share Posted January 19, 2020 17 minutes ago, commando said: he also argued that the statutory rape age should be lowered to 15 f#&%ing Alan! Link to comment
commando Posted January 19, 2020 Share Posted January 19, 2020 i saw this yesterday from a source i didn't know or trust....but seeing tribe mention it and mention what book it is from confirms it for me Link to comment
Nebfanatic Posted January 19, 2020 Share Posted January 19, 2020 27 minutes ago, commando said: i saw this yesterday from a source i didn't know or trust....but seeing tribe mention it and mention what book it is from confirms it for me If that happened we'd be hearing "Trump is right you know, we never had the right to that land. Trump is making a great deal for our country" Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 19, 2020 Share Posted January 19, 2020 2 hours ago, Nebfanatic said: If that happened we'd be hearing "Trump is right you know, we never had the right to that land. Trump is making a great deal for our country" It was a s#!t hole state anyway. 1 Link to comment
ZRod Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 7 hours ago, QMany said: I know I'll get grief for this, but do we really need to hold someone to their words from 45 years ago? We all grow and change with age. Is this a position he holds to this day? Link to comment
Landlord Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 2 hours ago, ZRod said: I know I'll get grief for this, but do we really need to hold someone to their words from 45 years ago? We all grow and change with age. Is this a position he holds to this day? Here's how I see it. If your outdated belief was acceptable when you held it, I'll give you the space to not let it define you as a person. If we already knew better and you still held it, which 1974 is flirting dangerously with, then you need to show active and explicit evidence that you have changed, or I'll continue to assess you by your previously evidenced beliefs. 1 1 Link to comment
commando Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 2 hours ago, ZRod said: I know I'll get grief for this, but do we really need to hold someone to their words from 45 years ago? We all grow and change with age. Is this a position he holds to this day? in this case his client holds those same views. so hard to say he doesn't hold those same views. 1 Link to comment
ZRod Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 1 hour ago, Landlord said: Here's how I see it. If your outdated belief was acceptable when you held it, I'll give you the space to not let it define you as a person. If we already knew better and you still held it, which 1974 is flirting dangerously with, then you need to show active and explicit evidence that you have changed, or I'll continue to assess you by your previously evidenced beliefs. That doesn't really allow people to evolve with time personally. Public and personal conscience are not the same. Also, it'd be nice to see the full context of his quote since I'm sure there is a larger agenda he's pushing. Either way, I've never really shared his opinion on too many things. Link to comment
Landlord Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 7 minutes ago, ZRod said: That doesn't really allow people to evolve with time personally. Public and personal conscience are not the same. Generally speaking, I've found that public people with legitimate integrity have public conscience that reflects and is an extension of their personal conscience. Link to comment
TGHusker Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 Intimidation - how Trump keeps a stranglehold on GOP congressmen during the impeachment process. https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-trump-has-kept-near-unanimous-gop-support-through-impeachment-11579442401 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts