Moiraine Posted December 18, 2018 Share Posted December 18, 2018 2 hours ago, ZRod said: If you do indict a sitting president it sets the precedents of removing your political opponent through special councel. They need to tread carefully. I guess both are dangerous then, and voters need to be less stupid. 3 Link to comment
deedsker Posted December 18, 2018 Share Posted December 18, 2018 Presidents need to be indicted for any offenses they committed while not president. That makes cheating to win an offense, not making decisions while president an offense, per se. 1 Link to comment
Fru Posted December 18, 2018 Share Posted December 18, 2018 13 hours ago, ZRod said: If you do indict a sitting president it sets the precedents of removing your political opponent through special councel. They need to tread carefully. If crimes can be proven through that special counsel, then I think most folks would be fine with that precedent being set. Additionally, I would imagine it would inherently discourage future candidates from committing such acts. 2 Link to comment
Ulty Posted December 18, 2018 Share Posted December 18, 2018 I think anyone who engages in criminal behavior should be held accountable for it, regardless of your job. And some jobs, such as the presidency, demand a higher standard of ethics, not a lower one. 4 Link to comment
commando Posted December 18, 2018 Share Posted December 18, 2018 this thread needs a witch emoji...or maybe a nothingburger that stretches from new york to philly and is over 200 ft thick emoji 1 Link to comment
commando Posted December 18, 2018 Share Posted December 18, 2018 lol....i wonder if she will address this subject again? maybe the judge is part of the deep state now? or maybe she will say the judge is right throw flynn in jail even against mueller asking for leniency? Link to comment
TGHusker Posted December 18, 2018 Share Posted December 18, 2018 6 hours ago, Ulty said: I think anyone who engages in criminal behavior should be held accountable for it, regardless of your job. And some jobs, such as the presidency, demand a higher standard of ethics, not a lower one. Link to comment
TGHusker Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 When Trump said he was going to 'Drain the Swamp' was he talking about leaving Washington DC himself You can't get more 'swamppy' than this: The 17 known Trump related investigations https://www.axios.com/donald-trump-federal-state-local-investigations-602d2e21-b087-454f-b887-57f2f5b4dc55.html Quote Investigations by special counsel Robert Mueller: Russian government’s election attack (the Internet Research Agency and GRU indictments) WikiLeaks Middle Eastern influence: Potentially the biggest unseen aspect of Mueller’s investigation is his year-long pursuit of Middle Eastern influence targeting the Trump campaign. Paul Manafort’s activity Trump Tower Moscow project Other campaign and transition contacts with Russia Obstruction of justice Investigations by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York: Campaign conspiracy and Trump Organization finances Inauguration funding Trump super PAC funding Foreign lobbying Investigations by the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia: Maria Butina and the NRA Investigations by the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia: Elena Alekseevna Khusyaynova, the alleged chief accountant of the Internet Research Agency who was indicted separately earlier this fall, charged with activity that went above and beyond the 2016 campaign. Why she was prosecuted separately remains a mystery. Turkish influence: Michael Flynn’s plea agreement includes some details of the case, and he is cooperating with investigators. Investigations by New York City, New York State and other state attorneys general: Tax case: In the wake of an N.Y. Times investigation that found Trump had benefited from more than $400 million in tax schemes, city officials said they were investigating Trump’s tax payments, as did the New York State Tax Department. The Trump Foundation Emoluments lawsuit: The attorneys general for Maryland and D.C. sent out subpoenas earlier this month for Trump Organization and hotel financial records relating to their lawsuit that the president is in breach of the "Emoluments Clause" of the Constitution, which appears to prohibit the president from accepting payments from foreign powers while in office. And there's a mystery investigation from an unknown office: Redacted Case #2: A second, redacted Flynn investigation could be one of the other investigations mentioned here. It could also represent another as-yet-unknown unfolding criminal case or could be a counterintelligence investigation that will never become public. 1 Link to comment
Danny Bateman Posted December 20, 2018 Share Posted December 20, 2018 Yeah, I would imagine this would come up when they're confirming you to oversee the investigation. Link to comment
schriznoeder Posted December 27, 2018 Share Posted December 27, 2018 But I thought the Steele Dossier was just a heap of untrue garbage? 1 Link to comment
ZRod Posted December 27, 2018 Share Posted December 27, 2018 14 minutes ago, schriznoeder said: But I thought the Steele Dossier was just a heap of untrue garbage? It's like amateur hour! I guess he'd never heard of a burner phone/sim card.. 3 Link to comment
schriznoeder Posted December 27, 2018 Share Posted December 27, 2018 3 minutes ago, ZRod said: It's like amateur hour! I guess he'd never heard of a burner phone/sim card.. I know, right? It's kind of comical how bad they are at being criminals. 3 Link to comment
Danny Bateman Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 I'm really starting to think Mr. "Promises made, promises kept" is framing things that way because he knows ignoring the elephant in the room is his only play. 2 Link to comment
Recommended Posts