Jump to content


DOJ Initial Russia Hearings


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Caveman said:

What is required for exoneration? Can somebody comment on why Mueller would make that distinction? Is that his way of recommending further investigation?

Great question and exactly the reason why we need to see the full report. The American people deserve to know the truth

1 minute ago, 45timesbetterthanemptysuit said:

Really? I look forward to the section on Hillary, Obama etc then. 

Well  you will be disappointed. 

Link to comment

our government is set up with checks and balances.    trump wants to end those in the most harsh way possible.   when they checked on him he whined and his followers whined.   they were the perfect snowflakes.   on nooosss...they are watching over trump...boo hoo

Link to comment

This is not the Mueller Report. This is a very brief, vague, and ambiguous "summary" by a person Trump appointed for this very reason. I just can't help but think of the misdirection, "alternative facts," and outright lies from Sanders, Conway, et al everyday. Do we remember the Nunes' memo? 

  • Plus1 5
Link to comment
5 minutes ago, Nebfanatic said:

Barrs letter specifically states Trump is not exhonerated by the report :lol: come on man you can do better than this.

Completely exhonerated for collusion. No statement regarding obstruction (of obstructing an illegal investigation of a made up crime.) had there been evidence supporting obstruction it would have went to a Grand Jury. 

Link to comment
Just now, 45timesbetterthanemptysuit said:

Completely exhonerated for collusion. No statement regarding obstruction (of obstructing an illegal investigation of a made up crime.) had there been evidence supporting obstruction it would have went to a Grand Jury. 

 

Would you have accepted the word of a person appointed by Hillary Clinton in the same circumstances?

  • Plus1 2
Link to comment

Just now, 45timesbetterthanemptysuit said:

Completely exhonerated for collusion. No statement regarding obstruction (of obstructing an illegal investigation of a made up crime.) had there been evidence supporting obstruction it would have went to a Grand Jury. 

Comey was investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election. How is that an illegal investigation when at the same time you want Obama locked up for doing nothing about Russian interference? Your narrative makes no sense.

  • Plus1 1
Link to comment
13 minutes ago, 45timesbetterthanemptysuit said:

They have been investigated and completely exhonerated. 

 

This is what you said. If you want to walk that back and claim you were only talking about collusion, then clarify it.

 

And it's spelled "exonerated."

Link to comment
Just now, 45timesbetterthanemptysuit said:

Reading must be really hard. Trump has been exhonerated of collusion. 

Well then I wouldn't say he is "completely exonerated" because he is not completely exonerated of obstruction. Lets see the full report so the American people can decide for themselves huh? 

Just now, 45timesbetterthanemptysuit said:

No he wasn’t. He was investigating Trump. He tossed a Russian bot farm in for show. 

HAH! Show me the proof because that is BS. 

  • Plus1 1
Link to comment
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...