Jump to content


DOJ Initial Russia Hearings


Recommended Posts


6 hours ago, Notre Dame Joe said:

Ahem, Hannity assembles clips of 'journalists' telling us about Trump's impending impeachment for Russian Collusion for the past two years, as could anyone with the internet. 

Curious. Have you actually read any of the report? Not Barrs excerpts and not even these screen grabs in this thread. Have you downloaded and read any of the report as it is? 

  • Plus1 4
Link to comment
6 hours ago, Nebfanatic said:

Curious. Have you actually read any of the report? Not Barrs excerpts and not even these screen grabs in this thread. Have you downloaded and read any of the report as it is? 

47306427_ScreenShot2019-04-18at3_20_05PM.png.ea36a455c345df8b785a7fa8346dd942.png

 

But if you want to jump to the money shot, screen grabs can be helpful....

 

 

  • Plus1 3
Link to comment
13 hours ago, Notre Dame Joe said:

Ahem, Hannity assembles clips of 'journalists' telling us about Trump's impending impeachment for Russian Collusion for the past two years, as could anyone with the internet. 

 

Did you actually say "ahem" before saying absolutely nothing new or interesting? 

  • Plus1 1
Link to comment

Just now, Notre Dame Joe said:

I was trying to explain to @Nebfanatic, "collusion" is dead in the water.  You must hold CONTROL and press X before pasting "obstruction" for mad libs. 

Collusion isn't a charge, conspiracy would be the charge. The report clearly outlines a relationship between Russia and the Trump campaign. Just because Mueller doesn't feel there is enough evidence to indict on conspiracy(a high bar and Mueller makes it clear in his report he won't indict Trump) doesn't mean there hasn't been concerning conduct regarding Trump and Russia. Its all outlined in the report if you would care to read. Its factual information that Russia interefered in the elections, preferred Trump as a canidate and Trump openly accepted their help. Its also factual information that TO THIS DAY Trump denies that Russia interfered in the elections even though the evidence is overwhelming. If you can read about Trumps relationship with Russia that is outlined in the report and say that its completely appropriate then maybe you aren't the patriot you think you are.

  • Plus1 4
Link to comment
15 minutes ago, Notre Dame Joe said:

I was trying to explain to @Nebfanatic, "collusion" is dead in the water.  You must hold CONTROL and press X before pasting "obstruction" for mad libs. 

How bout this excerpt from the report. Met with Russians to gather dirt on an opposing canidate then proceeded to cover it up. Mueller can't prove they meant to break the law, otherwise it would be against the law. In my opinion, our President shouldn't be engaging in these meetings. It might not rise to conspiracy, but its definitely not OK.

D4ck-xsWwAMhm9b.png

  • Plus1 3
Link to comment
12 hours ago, Nebfanatic said:

Collusion isn't a charge, conspiracy would be the charge. The report clearly outlines a relationship between Russia and the Trump campaign. Just because Mueller doesn't feel there is enough evidence to indict on conspiracy(a high bar and Mueller makes it clear in his report he won't indict Trump) doesn't mean there hasn't been concerning conduct regarding Trump and Russia. Its all outlined in the report if you would care to read. Its factual information that Russia interefered in the elections, preferred Trump as a canidate and Trump openly accepted their help. Its also factual information that TO THIS DAY Trump denies that Russia interfered in the elections even though the evidence is overwhelming. If you can read about Trumps relationship with Russia that is outlined in the report and say that its completely appropriate then maybe you aren't the patriot you think you are.

 

Would you feel better if Trump paid the Russians to compile a dossier about Hilary?

  • Plus1 1
Link to comment

4 hours ago, Notre Dame Joe said:

 

Would you feel better if Trump paid the Russians to compile a dossier about Hilary?

Who requested and began funding the dossier in the first place? The answer is the Washington Free Beacon, a republican group. 

Link to comment
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...