DOJ Initial Russia Hearings

[BigRedBuster]

 

 

Really???  And all his worshipers will now proclaim that "TRUMP HAS DECLARED THERE WASN'T COLLUSION SO THERE WASN'T ANY COLLUSION.  

Edited October 27, 2017 by BigRedBuster

[TGHusker]

4 hours ago, BigRedBuster said:

 

 

Really???  And all his worshipers will now proclaim that "TRUMP HAS DECLARED THERE WASN'T COLLUSION SO THERE WASN'T ANY COLLUSION.  

We could still end up wt a twofer -  Trump and Clinton both found guilty of collusion.   Now wouldn't that be something.

[Danny Bateman]

Light on details, but this is a legitimate bombshell. Puts the events of the past week into proper context... both by POTUS & the people in the White House, as well as Congressional Republicans on the hill.

 

I'm starting to understand why a couple Clinton investigations just popped up out of nowhere.

 

 

 

Edited October 28, 2017 by dudeguyy

[commando]

on cnn all the talk is about the charges brought tonight.   on fox news they are talking about the clintons.

[Danny Bateman]

44 minutes ago, commando said:

on cnn all the talk is about the charges brought tonight.   on fox news they are talking about the clintons.

 

Not surprised. Kinda proves my point, eh?

 

The power of Fox News to propagandize is rather outrageous.

 

 

Edited October 28, 2017 by dudeguyy

[Danny Bateman]

Ole conservative outrage machine really cranking overdrive tonight...

 

 

Edited October 28, 2017 by dudeguyy

[Danny Bateman]

Again, sometimes these people get so nervous they accidentally say what they really think...

 

I can only pontificate whether Corey wants to investigate the Hillary Clinton administration in Universe B or go back to digging up old skeletons from the 90s? Some more Whitewater, anyone?

 

 

Edited October 28, 2017 by dudeguyy

[zoogs]

I wonder if those so ready to jump on the "Clinton colluded with British foreign agent" line floated by the Trump propaganda mill had similar qualms about earlier well-documented and published reports spotlighting British firm Cambridge Analytica running data for the GOP campaign effort.

 

We are really susceptible to things we read. It's hard to help. A good rule of thumb is to remember that Trump is a dishonest person with bad intentions. 

Edited October 29, 2017 by zoogs

[MLB 51]

34 minutes ago, zoogs said:

I wonder if those so ready to jump on the "Clinton colluded with British foreign agent" line floated by the Trump propaganda mill had similar qualms about earlier well-documented and published reports spotlighting British firm Cambridge Analytica running data for the GOP campaign effort.

 

We are really susceptible to things we read. It's hard to help. A good rule of thumb is to remember that Trump is a dishonest person with bad intentions. 

I'm no Trump fan, but you could say the same thing about Clinton.

[zoogs]

You could, and you'd be making an extremely bad equivalence.

[Danny Bateman]

 

[Danny Bateman]

The grand prize winner in today's episode of "You've been indicted!" is Paulie Walnuts. He's turning himself over to Mueller, along with a business partner.
 

 

[commando]

pardons being tweeted ASAP

[NM11046]

3 minutes ago, commando said:

pardons being tweeted ASAP

Nah - we're still going with the shiny object philosophy.

 

 

[NM11046]

Indictment unsealed - link embedded:

 

 

Paul J. Manafort, Jr., of Alexandria, Va., and Richard W. Gates III, of Richmond, Va., have been indicted by a federal grand jury on Oct. 27, 2017, in the District of Columbia. The indictment contains 12 counts: conspiracy against the United States, conspiracy to launder money, unregistered agent of a foreign principal, false and misleading FARA statements, false statements, and seven counts of failure to file reports of foreign bank and financial accounts.