RedDenver Posted February 26, 2019 Share Posted February 26, 2019 1 hour ago, TGHusker said: Or about a particular dictator down south -- A rose by any other name is still a.... https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/bernie-sanders-wont-call-venezuelas-maduro-dictator-063601658.html This is much ado about nothing - same game the right played with "why won't you say radical Islamist terrorists". Bernie has been pretty clear on his stance: Link to comment
Ratt Mhule Posted February 27, 2019 Share Posted February 27, 2019 22 hours ago, TGHusker said: Or about a particular dictator down south -- A rose by any other name is still a.... https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/bernie-sanders-wont-call-venezuelas-maduro-dictator-063601658.html I mean were worried about if BS calls someone a dictator when the POTUS is tweeting about “my good friend Kim Jung Un”. Come on. Link to comment
TGHusker Posted February 27, 2019 Author Share Posted February 27, 2019 31 minutes ago, Frott Scost said: I mean were worried about if BS calls someone a dictator when the POTUS is tweeting about “my good friend Kim Jung Un”. Come on. I'm every bit as critical about trump and his new girl friend Kim. I think you know that by my posts. Link to comment
Ulty Posted March 4, 2019 Share Posted March 4, 2019 Hickenlooper officially announced that he is in. I've always been a fan of his, dating back to when he was mayor of Denver. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/colorado-s-john-hickenlooper-enters-presidential-race-says-country-faces-n978761 2 Link to comment
Fru Posted March 4, 2019 Share Posted March 4, 2019 Washington Governor Jay Inslee is in. Making climate change his number 1 issue. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/the-energy-202/2019/03/04/the-energy-202-climate-change-is-jay-inslee-s-top-priority-in-washington-could-it-win-him-the-white-house/5c7c209f1b326b2d177d5fb2/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.f94c6487939a Link to comment
mrandyk Posted March 4, 2019 Share Posted March 4, 2019 6 minutes ago, NebraskaShellback said: Trump wins. He lost by 3 million votes to freaking Hillary Clinton last time, and now has the distinct disadvantage of having had everyone watch him f#&% up for 4 years. 5 Link to comment
NebraskaShellback Posted March 4, 2019 Share Posted March 4, 2019 Just now, mrandyk said: He lost by 3 million votes to freaking Hillary Clinton last time, and now has the distinct disadvantage of having had everyone watch him f#&% up for 4 years. Look again https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jan/26/hillary-clinton-received-800000-votes-from-nonciti/ https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/three-million-votes-in-presidential-election-cast-by-illegal-aliens/ https://www.mercurynews.com/2017/01/26/trump-says-illegal-votes-cost-him-california-heres-why-thats-preposterous/ and again https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/most-undocumented-immigrants-live-in-areas-that-trump-lost/ 1 Link to comment
mrandyk Posted March 4, 2019 Share Posted March 4, 2019 1 minute ago, NebraskaShellback said: Look again https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jan/26/hillary-clinton-received-800000-votes-from-nonciti/ https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/three-million-votes-in-presidential-election-cast-by-illegal-aliens/ https://www.mercurynews.com/2017/01/26/trump-says-illegal-votes-cost-him-california-heres-why-thats-preposterous/ and again https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/most-undocumented-immigrants-live-in-areas-that-trump-lost/ Did you even read these? The Snopes link repeatedly states that there is no evidence to backup the claim that 3 million illegal votes were cast. The MercuryNews link has it right in the URL that Trump's claims about voter fraud are preposterous. If you want to have any sort of discussion you have to bring something other than fake news to back up your opinions. 3 Link to comment
NebraskaShellback Posted March 4, 2019 Share Posted March 4, 2019 Just now, mrandyk said: Did you even read these? The Snopes link repeatedly states that there is no evidence to backup the claim that 3 million illegal votes were cast. The MercuryNews link has it right in the URL that Trump's claims about voter fraud are preposterous. If you want to have any sort of discussion you have to bring something other than fake news to back up your opinions. Giving different views, we do not need one view right? 1 Link to comment
mrandyk Posted March 4, 2019 Share Posted March 4, 2019 Just now, NebraskaShellback said: Giving different views, we do not need one view right? And how do you defend a view that doesn't conform with any sort of evidence? Link to comment
NebraskaShellback Posted March 4, 2019 Share Posted March 4, 2019 Guess what, netither does yours Bye Hillary voters 1 Link to comment
mrandyk Posted March 4, 2019 Share Posted March 4, 2019 2 minutes ago, NebraskaShellback said: Guess what, netither does yours Bye Hillary voters It's probably best to just keep quiet when your only rebuttals are along the lines of "I know you are but what am I?", or "Nuh-uh!". 2 Link to comment
NebraskaShellback Posted March 4, 2019 Share Posted March 4, 2019 LOL whatever mrandyk. Let the fake news guide your evidence lol 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts