Chris Jones out 4-6 months

[famoustitles]

On 9/27/2017 at 9:27 AM, famoustitles said:

If this ends up happening 

 

On 8/11/2017 at 6:21 PM, famoustitles said:

I'm now predicting he'll play sparingly in the Illinois game and be ready for Wisconsin.

 

Nfm

[lo country]

3 minutes ago, Mavric said:

Hoping this works out.  But it seems like a pretty decent gamble.

 

Back on the shortest end of the recovery time and said to only be playing part of the game does not sound that healthy to me.

 

If he's not healthy enough to be playing the entire game, I'm not sure he should be out there.  If he's not healthy enough to do that, we're risking poor play at best and reinjury at worst.

Hoping it's more along the lines of rusty, the guys are now 5 games into playing together, team chemistry and all that........Be incredibly stupid if he's "almost there" and the staff wants to see how close he is.

[GBRFAN]

12 hours ago, Mavric said:

Hoping this works out.  But it seems like a pretty decent gamble.

 

Back on the shortest end of the recovery time and said to only be playing part of the game does not sound that healthy to me.

 

If he's not healthy enough to be playing the entire game, I'm not sure he should be out there.  If he's not healthy enough to do that, we're risking poor play at best and reinjury at worst.

 

doubt his conditioning is ready for a full game.  You can train all you want in the gym and it isn't the same as playing in the game - he also hasn't probably been in the gym much until recently.  Guessing the staff know what they are doing, however it sounds like you have your share of doubt.

[Mavric]

I didn't notice him out there.  But he was credited with two tackles. 

 

Anyone notice how much he played?

[Nebfanatic]

1 minute ago, Mavric said:

I didn't notice him out there.  But he was credited with two tackles. 

 

Anyone notice how much he played?

He played a little. Allowed a 15ish yard gain to Fumigali I think early on but wasn't around too much after that. 

[Mavric]

According to the newspapers, he played more as the game went on.  Don't know if that's right or not.

 

But considering how much they ran (all over us) in the second half, that would explain why he wasn't really in on many plays.

[ScottyIce]

17 minutes ago, Mavric said:

According to the newspapers, he played more as the game went on.  Don't know if that's right or not.

 

But considering how much they ran (all over us) in the second half, that would explain why he wasn't really in on many plays.

 

I counted at minimum 10 snaps. I would wager around 20

[Mavric]